Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Environments that Improve STEM Capabilities in Israel: Constructional Play and Preschoolers’ Engineering Habits of Mind

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Play and STEM Education in the Early Years

Abstract

Early childhood is ideal period for introducing STEM concepts and engaging children in developmentally appropriate activities to begin understanding the world around them. The Preschool Education Division of the Israeli Ministry of Education has initiated the Future Kindergarten model—encouraging educators and children to initiate, explore, and create their own diverse learning environments and resources. The model is conducive to developing knowledge, skills, and values tailored to the children’s needs, based on four anchors: Personal Expression; Community; Entrepreneurship and Productivity; Learning in Living Spaces. In accordance with this initiative we describe research-based evidence that shows that when educators allow children to play and collaborate independently in an educational environment richly equipped with construction materials, the children improve their Engineering Habits of Mind (EHoM) and their design products. Preschoolers (N =228, 5–6 years of age), from six mainstream classrooms, took part in this study. The intervention group (N =126) experienced 6 month of free-choice construction experiences in the enriched learning environment with diverse materials. This group performed significantly better in EHoM practices and the quality of the design product in an open-ended, problem-solving construction task. These results demonstrate the ways in which well thought learning environments, enriched with open-ended materials can enhance preschoolers’ cognitive capabilities in a play-based manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this chapter, the terms preschool and kindergarten are used as synonyms.

References

  • Aguirre‐Muñoz, Z., & Pantoya, M. L. (2016). Engineering literacy and engagement in kindergarten classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 105(4), 630–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2011). Starting young: Learning outcomes of a developmentally appropriate PreK engineering curriculum. In Proceedings of the Research in Engineering Education Symposium. Madrid, Spain: Universidad Politecnica de Madres.‏

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2015). Engineering curriculum in the preschool classroom: The teacher’s experience. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 23(1), 112–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagiati, A., & Evangelou, D. (2016). Practicing engineering while building with blocks: Identifying engineering thinking. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 24(1), 67–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children, Youth and Environments, 21(2), 212–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., Davies, F., Zhang, Y., & Barrett, L. (2015). The impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning: Final results of a holistic, multi-level analysis. Building and Environment, 89, 118–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellanca, J. A. (Ed.). (2010). 21st century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Solution Tree Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berris, R., & Miller, E. (2011). How design of the physical environment impacts early learning: Educators and parents perspectives. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(4), 102–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonawitz, E., Shafto, P., Gweon, H., Goodman, N. D., Spelke, E., & Schulz, L. (2011). The double-edged sword of pedagogy: Instruction limits spontaneous exploration and discovery. Cognition, 120(3), 322–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, B. T., Donovan, M. S., & Burns, M. S. (Eds.). (2001). Eager to learn: Educating our preschoolers. Washington, DC: Committee on Early Childhood Pedagogy, Commission on Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Academy Press, National Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenneman, K., Stevenson-Boyd, J., & Frede, E. (2009). Math and science in preschool: Policies and practices. National Institute for Early Education Research Policy Brief.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, S. P., & Evangelou D. (2007). Precursors to Engineering Thinking (PET). Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the American Society of Engineering Education. ASEE

    Google Scholar 

  • Brophy, S., Klein, S., Portsmore, M., & Rogers, C. (2008). Advancing engineering education in the P-12 classrooms. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1978). Who needs parent education. Teachers College Record, 79(4), 767–787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, C., Goodman, N. D., & Schulz, L. E. (2011). Where science starts: Spontaneous experiments in preschoolers’ exploratory play. Cognition, 120(3), 341–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, C., Lachapelle, C. P., & Lindgren-Streicher, A. (2005). Assessing elementary school students’ conceptions of engineering and technology. Paper presented at 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference. Portland, Oregon. https://doi.org/10.18260/1-2--14836‏

  • Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L., & Dunn, L. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test. Bloomington, MN.‏

    Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D. (2018). Early engineering: An introduction to young children’s potential. In L. English & T. Moore (Eds.), Early engineering learning (pp. 1–5). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • English, L. D., & Gainsburg, J. (2015). Problem solving in a 21st-century mathematics curriculum. In L. D. English & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of international research in mathematics education (pp. 325–347). Routledge.‏ https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203448946

  • Eshach, H. (2006). Science literacy in primary schools and pre-schools. Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou, D., Dobbs-Oates, J., Bagiati, A., Liang, S., & Choi, J. Y. (2010). Talking about artifacts: Preschool children’s explorations with sketches, stories, and tangible objects. Early Childhood Research & Practice, 12(2), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell, A. (2018). Generation Alpha: Q&A with Ashley Fell. Mccrindle. https://mccrindle.com.au/insights/blogarchive/generation-alpha-qanda-with-ashley-fell/

  • Fleer, M. (2020). Studying the relations between motives and motivation—How young children develop a motive orientation for collective engineering play. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 24, 100355.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100355

  • French, L. (2004). Science as the center of a coherent, integrated early childhood curriculum. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 19(1), 138–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Future Kindergarten Model. (2019). The Ministry of Education. https://edu.gov.il/minhalpedagogy/preschool/subjects/Pages/ganatidi.aspx

  • Gold, Z. S. (2017). Engineering play: Exploring associations with executive function, mathematical ability, and spatial ability in preschool (Doctoral dissertation, Purdue University).‏

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Z.S., Elicker, J. (2020). Engineering peer play: A new perspective on Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) early childhood education. In A. Ridgway, G. Quiñones, & L. Li (Eds.), Peer play and relationships in early childhood. international perspectives on early childhood education and development (Vol. 30, pp. 61–75). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42331-5_5

  • Gold, Z. S., Elicker, J., & Beaulieu, B. A. (2020). Learning engineering through block play. Young Children, 75(2), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gold, Z. S., Elicker, J., Choi, J. Y., Anderson, T., & Brophy, S. P. (2015). Preschoolers’ engineering play behaviors: Differences in gender and play context. Children, Youth and Environments, 25(3), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (Eds.) (2009). Engineering in the K-12 education. Understanding the states and improving the prospects (Vol. 16). National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/12635

  • Lippard, C. N., Lamm, M. H., & Riley, K. L. (2017). Engineering thinking in prekindergarten children: A systematic literature review. Journal of Engineering Education, 106(3), 454–474.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippard, C. N., Riley, K. L., & Lamm, M. H. (2018). Encouraging the development of engineering habits of mind in prekindergarten learners. In L. English, & T. Moore (Eds.), Early engineering learning: Early mathematics learning and development (pp. 19–36). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_3

  • Lucas, B., Claxton, G., & Hanson, J. (2014). Thinking like an engineer: Implications for the education system.‏ Royal Academy of Engineers Standing Committee for Education and Training. Royal Academy of Engineers.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council. (2014). STEM integration in K-12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2018). The future of education and skills: Education 2030. OECD Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

  • Osborne, J., & Dillon, J. (2008). Science education in Europe: Critical reflections (Vol. 13). The Nuffield Foundation.‏ http://efepereth.wdfiles.com/local--files/science-education/Sci_Ed_in_Europe_Report_Final.pdf

  • Pantoya, M. L., Aguirre-Mu~noz, Z., & Hunt, E. M. (2015). Developing an engineering identity in early childhood. American Journal of Engineering Education, 6(2), 166–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattison, S., Svarovsky, G., Ramos-Montañez, S., Gontan, I., Weiss, S., Núñez, V., Corrie, P., Smith, C., & Benne, M. (2020). Understanding early childhood engineering interest development as a family-level systems phenomenon: Findings from the head start on engineering project. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 10(1), Article 6. https://doi.org/10.7771/2157-9288.1234

  • Petroski, H. (1992). To engineer is human: The role of failure in successful design. Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preschool Education Division. (2018). The Ministry of Education. https://edu.gov.il/minhalpedagogy/preschool/Pages/preschool-education.aspx

  • Raven, J. C. (1956). Coloured Progressive Matrices (CPM). Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott-Webber, L., Konyndyk, R., French, R., & French, J. (2018). Significant results. space makes a difference increasing student academic engagement levels. European Scientific Journal, 14, 16–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechter., T., & Spektor-Levy, S. (2018). To build and to be built—Engineering thinking in Kindergarten. Da-Gan Journal, 11, 8–17 [Hebrow].

    Google Scholar 

  • Shechter, T., Eden, S., & Spektor-Levy, O. (2021). Preschoolers’ Nascent Engineering Thinking During a Construction Task. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 20(2), 83–111.‏

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibuma, B., Wunnava, S., John, M. S., Anggoro, F., & Dubosarsky, M. (2018). The impact of an integrated Pre-K STEM curriculum on teachers’ engineering content knowledge, self-efficacy, and teaching practices. In 2018 IEEE Integrated STEM Education Conference (ISEC) (pp. 224–227). IEEE.‏

    Google Scholar 

  • Tank, K. M., Moore, T. J., Dorie, B. L., Gajdzik, E., Sanger, M. T., Rynearson, A. M., & Mann, E. F. (2018). Engineering in early elementary classrooms through the integration of high-quality literature, design, and STEM+ C content. In L. English, T. Moore (eds) Early engineering learning. Early mathematics learning and development (pp. 175–201). Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-8621-2_9

  • Tourgeman, M., Alderoqui Pinus, D. & Gerad, M. (2019). The future kindergarten model: To be myself, to belong, to discover the world. Alon Da-Gan, 12, 8–19 [Hebrew].

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meeteren, B., & Zan, B. (2010). Revealing the work of young engineers in early childhood education. Early Childhood Research and Practices, 12(2), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Meeteren, B. (2013). Designing elementary engineering education from the perspective of the child. University of Northern Iowa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, J., Spencer, K., & Hammer, D. (2014). Examining young students’ problem scoping in engineering design. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 43–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Worth, K. (2010). Science in early childhood classrooms: Content and process. Early Childhood Research & Practice (ECRP), 12(2), 1–17.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Faculty of Education, Bar Ilan University, Israel, Ramat Gan

    Ornit Spektor-Levy & Taly Shechter

Authors
  1. Ornit Spektor-Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Taly Shechter
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ornit Spektor-Levy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. UCL Institute of Education, London, UK

    Sue Dale Tunnicliffe

  2. University of Texas at Tyler, Tyler, TX, USA

    Teresa J. Kennedy

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Spektor-Levy, O., Shechter, T. (2022). Learning Environments that Improve STEM Capabilities in Israel: Constructional Play and Preschoolers’ Engineering Habits of Mind. In: Tunnicliffe, S.D., Kennedy, T.J. (eds) Play and STEM Education in the Early Years. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99830-1_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99830-1_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99829-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99830-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation