Skip to main content

Comparison of the Effect of Regularization Techniques and Lookback Window Length on Deep Learning Models in Short Term Load Forecasting

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of 2021 International Top-Level Forum on Engineering Science and Technology Development Strategy (PMF 2019, PMF 2021)

Abstract

Management of electric power balance requires accurate forecasting of load and generation, especially in the context of renewable energy adoption. In this context, forecasting electric load requires more attention to decrease the uncertainties in the system operation. There have been many studies under this context, however, the effect of the lookback window for both deep learning and regularization techniques has not been fully investigated in the literature. In this study, we developed a comparative study based on 4 typical deep learning techniques, namely MLP, 1D-CNN, LSTM, and a hybrid model that is a combination of 1D-CNN and LSTM to forecast the electrical load. The effect of both regularization methods and lookback window length has been investigated in detail and found that they improved the forecasting performance based on the complexity and features of the networks. The methods are evaluated in terms of 4 different metrics namely MSE, MAE, MAPE and, R2. The results show LSTM outperformed the other methods in general, and the increase of lookback length improved its performance with the average MAPE less than 2%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Energy Information Administration (EIA), https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/ieo/. Last accessed 14 Apr 2021

  2. Notton G et al (2018) Intermittent and stochastic character of renewable energy sources: consequences, cost of intermittence and benefit of forecasting. Renew sustain Energy Rev 87:96–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. He W (2017) Load forecasting via deep neural networks. Procedia Comput Sci 122:308–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alpaydin E (2020) Introduction to machine learning. MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  5. Masum S, Liu Y, Chiverton J (2018) Multi-step time series forecasting of electric load using machine learning models. In: International conference on artificial intelligence and soft computing. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eskandari H, Imani M, Moghaddam MP (2021) Convolutional and recurrent neural network based model for short-term load forecasting. Electric Power Syst Res 195:107173

    Google Scholar 

  7. Hosein S, Hosein P (2017) Load forecasting using deep neural networks. 2017 IEEE power & energy society innovative smart grid technologies conference (ISGT). IEEE

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tian C, et al. (2018) A deep neural network model for short-term load forecast based on long short-term memory network and convolutional neural network. Energies 11(12): 3493

    Google Scholar 

  9. Srivastava N et al (2014) Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting. J Mach Learn Res 15(1):1929–1958

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhu D et al. (2018) A machine learning approach for air quality prediction: Model regularization and optimization. Big Data Cognit Comput 2(1):5

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bouktif S, et al. (2018) Optimal deep learning lstm model for electric load forecasting using feature selection and genetic algorithm: comparison with machine learning approaches. Energies 11(7):1636

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ghiasi G, Lin T-Y, Le QV (2018) Dropblock: a regularization method for convolutional networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.12890

  13. Goodfellow I, et al. (2016) Deep learning, vol 1, no 2. Cambridge, MIT press

    Google Scholar 

  14. Understanding LSTM Networks, http://colah.github.io/posts/2015-08-Understanding-LSTMs/. Last accessed 18 Apr 2021

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aysegul Kahraman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kahraman, A., Hou, P., Yang, G., Yang, Z. (2022). Comparison of the Effect of Regularization Techniques and Lookback Window Length on Deep Learning Models in Short Term Load Forecasting. In: Xue, Y., Zheng, Y., Novosel, D. (eds) Proceedings of 2021 International Top-Level Forum on Engineering Science and Technology Development Strategy . PMF PMF 2019 2021. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 816. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7156-2_45

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-7156-2_45

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-16-7155-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-16-7156-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics