Abstract
The number of procedures focused on dam safety is very large, mainly due to the rules established by different regulatory bodies, the guidelines that are part of the recommended best practices for engineering works, and the common sense and conservatism present in dam operation and maintenance because of the large socioeconomic and environmental impacts that any incident with a dam can cause. In practice, the vulnerability of a dam is inversely proportional to the improvement of safety procedures, such as monitoring and sensing, and the staff’s capacity to interpret the information in timely fashion. Therefore, establishing priorities for these procedures is essential for the plant management to define the scheduling and detailing of inspections and monitoring, as well as training needs. The MCDA model described here was specified based on regulations and practical public domain guidelines. The subjective estimation of preferences was done by the staff of a hydroelectric plant located in central Brazil. It employed the Simos method combined with a procedure adopted to convert the scores to the format of paired comparisons. The weights for dam safety procedures were obtained using the fuzzy AHP method. The method allowed obtaining the classification of safety procedures according to their priorities, and thus provided the plant management with elements to better schedule monitoring and staff training.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
R codes are available in Supplementary Information.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
Adamo N, Al-Ansari N, Laue J et al (2017) Risk management concepts in dam safety evaluation: Mosul Dam as a case study. J Civ Eng Archit 11:635–652. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7359/2017.07.002
ANA (2016) Manual do Empreendedor sobre Segurança de Barragens, Guia de Orientação e Formulários para Inspeções de Segurança de Barragem II-V-VII-VIII, Brasília: Agência Nacional de Águas. https://arquivos.ana.gov.br/cadastros/barragens/ManualEmpreendedor/GuiaRevisaoPeriodicaSegurancaBarragem.PDF
Andersen GR, Chouinard LE, Bouvier C et al (1999) Ranking procedure on maintenance tasks for monitoring of embankment dams. J Geotech Geoenvironmental Eng 125:247. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(1999)125:4(247)
Arce ME, Saavedra A, Míguez JL et al (2015) The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47:924–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.010
Arikana R, Dagdevirena M, Kurta M (2013) The fuzzy multi-attribute decision making model for strategic risk assessment. Int J Comput Intell Syst 6:487–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/18756891.2013.781334
ASCE (2018) Task committee on instrumentation and monitoring dam performance. Instrumentation and measurement tools. In: Rubertis K (ed) Monitoring dam performance: instrumentation and measurements. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 57–208
Avdi A, Zairi M, Dhia H (2013) Minimization of environmental risk of landfill site using fuzzy logic, analytical hierarchy process, and weighted linear combination methodology in a geographic information system environment. Environ Earth Sci 68:1375–1389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-012-1836-3
Baecher GB (2016) Uncertainty in dam safety risk analysis. Georisk: Assess Manag Risk Eng Syst Geohazards 10:92–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/17499518.2015.1102293
BRASIL (2010) Lei nº 12.334 de 20 de setembro de 2010. Presidência da República. Brasília: Presidência da República. http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_Ato2007-2010/2010/Lei/L12334.htm
Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17:233–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9
Chan HK, Wang X (2013) Fuzzy hierarchical model for risk assessment: principles, concepts, and practical applications. Springer, London
Chang DY (1996) Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 95:649–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(95)00300-2
Curt C, Talon A, Mauris G (2008) Using physical measurements, sensory evaluations, and expert judgements in a dam assessment support system. In: 12th IMEKO TC1 & TC7 joint symposium on man science and measurement, Annecy, France, 3–5. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Corinne_Curt/publication/237138869_Using_physical_measurements_sensory_evaluations_and_expert_judgements_in_a_dam_assessment_support_system/links/541fd2b50cf2218008d3fd8f.pdf
Curt C, Talon A (2013) Assessment and control of the quality of data used during dam reviews by using expert knowledge and the ELECTRE TRI method. J Comput Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000187
Donnelly CR, Acharya AM (2020) A discussion on the evolution and application of quantitative risk informed dam safety decision making. In: Mohd SL, Salih G, Boosroh M (eds) ICDSME 2019: water resources development and management. Springer, Singapore
ELETROBRAS (2003) Critérios de Projeto Civil de Usinas Hidrelétricas. Rio de Janeiro: Eletrobrás. https://eletrobras.com/pt/AreasdeAtuacao/geracao/Manuais%20para%20Estudos%20e%20Projetos%20de%20Gera%C3%A7%C3%A3o%20de%20Energia/Crit%C3%A9rios%20de%20Projetos.pdf
Espino DJ, Hernandez JR, Valeri VCA, Munoz FB (2014) A fuzzy stochastic multi-criteria model for the selection of urban pervious pavements. Expert Syst Appl 41:6807–6817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.05.008
Figueira J, Roy B (2002) Determining the weights of criteria in the ELECTRE type methods with a revised Simos’ procedure. Eur J Oper Res 139:317–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00370-8
Govindan K, Rajendran S, Sarkis J et al (2015) (2015) Multi criteria decision making approaches for green supplier evaluation and selection: a literature review. J Clean Prod 98:66–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.06.046
Hilbert M (2012) Toward a synthesis of cognitive biases: how noisy information processing can bias human decision making. Psychol Bull 138:211–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025940
ICOLD (1995) Dam failures statistical analysis, Bulletin 99. International Commission on Large Dams
ICOLD (2015) Regulation of dam safety: an overview of current practice worldwide. Bulletin preprint – 167. International Commission on Large Dams, Paris
Jing M, Jie Y, Shou-yi L et al (2018) Application of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process in the risk assessment of dangerous small-sized reservoirs. Int J Mach Learn Cyber 9:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0363-4
Kahraman C, Cebeci U, Ulukan Z (2003) Multi-criteria supplier selection using fuzzy AHP. Logist Inf Manag 16:382–394. https://doi.org/10.1108/09576050310503367
Keprate A, Ratnayake RMC (2016) Determining the degree of fuzziness for fuzzy-AHP methodology used for identifying fatigue critical piping locations for inspection, in 20th Jubilee IEEE International conference on intelligent engineering systems, June 30-July 2. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/7555113
Klir GJ, Yuan B (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: theory and applications. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River
Koelewijn AR, Bridle R (2017) Internal erosion in dams and dikes: a comparison. 25th meeting of European working group on internal erosion in embankment dams and their foundations, EWG-IE. Available at: http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:0086fdf4-933e-4786-a20b-b5ae93071420
Larrauri PC, Lall U (2020) Assessing the exposure of critical infrastructure and other assets to the climate induced failure of aging dam in the U.S. final report. Global Risk Institute (GRI), Toronto
Lewin J, Ballard G, Bowles DS (2003) Spillway gate reliability in the context of overall dam failure risk. USSD annual lecture, Charleston, South Carolina. April 2003. Available at: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4e93/2f4989c4670f1a256280aae93b5583f685b2.pdf?_ga=2.267388750.1942294907.1587587462-1194159247.1587587462
Li F, Phoon K, Du X, Zhang M (2013) Improved AHP method and its application in risk identification. J Constr Eng Manag-ASCE 139:312–320. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000605
Li X, Li Y, Lu X, Wang Y, Zhang H, Zhang P (2020) An online anomaly recognition and early warning model for dam safety monitoring data. Struct Health Monit 19:796–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/1475921719864265
Little RG (2002) Controlling cascading failure: understanding the vulnerabilities of interconnected infrastructures. J Urban Technol 9:109–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/106307302317379855
Masoumi I, Ahangari K, Noorzad A (2018) Integrated fuzzy decision approach for reliability improvement of dam instrumentation and monitoring. J Struct Integr Maint 3:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/24705314.2018.1461546
Mikhailov L (2000) A fuzzy programming method for deriving priorities in the analytic hierarchy process. J Oper Res Soc 51:341–349. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600899
Mikhailov L (2002) Fuzzy analytical approach to partnership selection in formation of virtual enterprises. Omega 30:393–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0483(02)00052-X
Mikhailov L (2003) Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements. Fuzzy Sets Syst 134:365–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00383-4
Mizuno M, Hirose T (2009) Instrumentation and monitoring of dams and reservoirs. In: Takahasi Y (ed) Water storage, transport, and distribution, UNESCO-EOLSS, 176–196. Available at: https://www.eolss.net/ebooklib/ebookcontents/E2-12-ThemeContents.pdf
Murray AT, Grubesic TH (2007) Overview of reliability and vulnerability in critical infrastructure. In: Murray AT, Grubesic TH (eds) Critical infrastructure: reliability and vulnerability. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 1–8 (ISSN 1430-9602)
Pagano L, Fontanella E, Sica S et al (2010) Pore water pressure measurements in the interpretation of the hydraulic behaviour of two earth dams. Soils Found 50:295–307. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.50.295
Pan Q, Dias D (2016) The effect of pore water pressure on tunnel face stability. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 40:2123–2136. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2528
Papathoma-Köhle M (2016) Vulnerability curves vs. vulnerability indicators: application of an indicator-based methodology for debris-flow hazards. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 16:1771–1790. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-16-1771-2016
Pictet J, Bollinger D (2005) The silent negotiation or how to elicit collective information for group MCDA without excessive discussion. J Multicriteria Decis Anal 13:199–211. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.392
Ribas JR, da Silva M (2015) A decision support system for prioritizing investments in an energy efficiency program in favelas in the city of Rio de Janeiro. J Multi-Criteria Decis Anal 22(1–2):89–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.1524
Ribas JR, Pérez-Díaz JI (2019) A multicriteria fuzzy approximate reasoning approach for risk assessment of dam safety. Environ Earth Sci 78:514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-019-8526-3
Ribas JR, Arce ME, Sohler FA, Suárez-García A (2019) Multi-criteria risk assessment: case study of a large hydroelectric project. J Clean Prod 227:237–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.043
Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Eur J Oper Res 48:9–26
Saaty TL, Vargas LG (2012) How to make a decision: models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Int Ser Oper Res Manag Sci 175:1–21
Saaty T. (2008) Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1: 83–98. Available at: https://www.people.iup.edu/rhoch/ClassPages/EnvPlanningSeminar_X/Readings/AHP/Saaty_AHP_2008.pdf
Santillán D, Fraile-Ardanuy J, Toledo MA (2013) Dam seepage analysis based on artificial neural networks: The hysteresis phenomenon. In: The 2013 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), Dallas, TX, 2013, pp. 1–8. Available at: http://oa.upm.es/30159/1/INVE_MEM_2013_158308.pdf.
Seyed-Kolbadi SM, Hariri-Ardebili MA, Mirtaheri M, Pourkamali-Anaraki F (2020) Instrumented health monitoring of an earth dam. Infrastructures 5:26–37. https://doi.org/10.3390/infrastructures5030026
Van Laarhoven PJM, Pedrycz W (1983) A fuzzy extension of Saaty’s priority theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 11:229–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0114(83)80082-7
Vojteková J, Vojtek M (2020) Assessment of landslide susceptibility at a local spatial scale applying the multi-criteria analysis and GIS: a case study from Slovakia. Geomat Nat Haz Risk 11:131–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2020.1713233
Wang YM, Luo Y, Hua Z (2008) On the extent analysis method for fuzzy AHP and its applications. Eur J Oper Res 186:735–747. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2007.01.050
Wijitkosum S, Sriburi T (2019) Fuzzy AHP integrated with GIS analyses for drought risk assessment: a case study from upper Phetchaburi river Basin, Thailand. Water 11:939. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11050939
Yucesan M, Kahraman G (2019) Risk evaluation and prevention in hydropower plant operations: a model based on Pythagorean fuzzy AHP. Energy Policy 126:343–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.11.039
Zeng J, An M, Smith NJ (2007) Application of fuzzy decision-making based methodology to construct project risk assessment. Int J Proj Manag 25:589–600. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.02.006
Zhu KJ, Jing Y, Chang DY (1999) A discussion on extent analysis method and applications of fuzzy AHP. Eur J Oper Res 116:450–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(98)00331-2
Zio E (2016) Challenges in the vulnerability and risk analysis of critical infrastructures. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 152:137–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2016.02.009
Zou Q et al (2013) Comprehensive flood risk assessment based on set pair analysis-variable fuzzy model and fuzzy sets AHP. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 27:525–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0598-5
Funding
The field research received financial support from Corumbá Concessões S/A and Agência Nacional de Energia Elétrica under the R&D Project PD-02262-0017/2019.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Not applicable.
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ribas, J.R., Severo, J.C.R., Felix, L.C.G. et al. Prioritization of hydroelectric power plant earth dam safety procedures: a multi-criteria approach. Environ Earth Sci 80, 815 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10096-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-021-10096-9