Skip to main content
Log in

Effectiveness of polypharmacy reduction policy in Japan: nationwide retrospective observational study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background Polypharmacy is an important global health issue. In Japan, an amended policy has been implemented since April 2016 to offer incentives that allow claiming a payment of approximately 22.5 US$ per patient to hospitals and clinics that succeed to reduce two or more medications. However, there is no evidence on the nationwide effectiveness of polypharmacy reduction policy. Aim To evaluate the effectiveness of the polypharmacy reduction policy in Japan using nationwide outpatient prescription fee reimbursement claims data in Open Data of the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan. Method This nationwide retrospective observational study was conducted over 3 years (April 2015 to March 2018). The primary outcome was the polypharmacy reduction ratio calculated by the polypharmacy proportion. Factors associated with policy effectiveness were identified by performing a multiple linear regression analysis using independent variables. Results After implementing the new policy, a 7.3 % polypharmacy reduction ratio was observed, particularly in the elderly (8.2 %). Multiple linear regression analysis revealed that the proportion of elderly residents (aged ≥65 years), number of hospitals per 100,000 residents, and number of clinics per 100,000 residents were statistically significantly associated with this reduction. Conclusion The polypharmacy reduction policy indicated an association with polypharmacy reduction in Japan. The proportion of elderly residents and availability of hospitals and clinics are important factors to enhance the effectiveness of the polypharmacy reduction policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets generated during and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Fick DM, Cooper JW, Wade WE, et al. Updating the Beers criteria for potentially inappropriate medication use in older adults: results of a US consensus panel of experts. Arch Intern Med. 2003;163:2716–24. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.163.22.2716.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Leelakanok N, Holcombe AL, Lund BC, et al. Association between polypharmacy and death: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Pharm Assoc. 2017;57:729–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japh.2017.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang N, Sundquist J, Sundquist K, et al. An increasing trend in the prevalence of polypharmacy in Sweden: a nationwide register-based study. Front Pharmacol. 2020;11:326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.00326.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Musawe LA, Torre C, Guerreiro JP, et al. Polypharmacy, potentially serious clinically relevant drug–drug interactions, and inappropriate medicines in elderly people with type 2 diabetes and their impact on quality of life. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2020;8:e00621. https://doi.org/10.1002/prp2.621.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Park YT, Kim D, Park RW, et al. Association between full electronic medical record system adoption and drug use: antibiotics and polypharmacy. Healthc Inform Res. 2020;26:68–77. https://doi.org/10.4258/hir.2020.26.1.68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kang H, Hong SH. Risk of kidney dysfunction from polypharmacy among older patients: a nested case-control study of the South Korean senior cohort. Sci Rep. 2019;9:10440. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-46849-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang YJ, Chiang SC, Lee PC, et al. Is excessive polypharmacy a transient or persistent phenomenon? A nationwide cohort study in Taiwan. Front Pharmacol. 2018;9:120. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2018.00120.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Christensen LD, Reilev M, Juul-Larsen HG, et al. Use of prescription drugs in the older adult population—a nationwide pharmacoepidemiological study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2019;75:1125–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02669-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Simões PA, Santiago LM, Maurício K, et al. Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication in the older adult population within primary care in Portugal: a nationwide cross-sectional study. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2019;13:1569–76. https://doi.org/10.2147/PPA.S219346.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim SJ, Kwon OD, Han EB, et al. Impact of number of medications and age on adherence to antihypertensive medications: a nationwide population-based study. Medicine. 2019;98:e17825. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000017825.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Prami T, Khanfir H, Hasvold P, et al. Concomitant use of drugs known to cause interactions with oral antiplatelets–polypharmacy in acute coronary syndrome outpatients in Finland. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2020;76:257–65. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-019-02777-z.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Amano H, Fujimoto K, Fujimori M, et al. The prevalence and characteristics of older Japanese adults with polypharmacy, based on regionally representative health insurance claims Data. Acta Med Okayama. 2020;74:41–8. https://doi.org/10.18926/AMO/57951.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Onoue H, Koyama T, Zamami Y, et al. Trends in polypharmacy in Japan: a nationwide retrospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2018;66:2267–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15569.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Horii T, Iwasawa M, Kabeya Y, et al. Polypharmacy and oral antidiabetic treatment for type 2 diabetes characterised by drug class and patient characteristics: a Japanese database analysis. Sci Rep. 2019;9:12992. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-49424-2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Uchida M, Suzuki S, Sugawara H, et al. A nationwide survey of hospital pharmacist interventions to improve polypharmacy for patients with cancer in palliative care in Japan. J Pharm Health Care Sci. 2019;5:14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-019-0143-5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Alwhaibi M, Balkhi B, Alhawassi TM, et al. Polypharmacy among patients with diabetes: a cross-sectional retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e020852. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020852.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Assari S, Helmi H, Bazargan M. Polypharmacy in African American adults: a national epidemiological study. Pharmacy. 2019;7:7–33. https://doi.org/10.3390/pharmacy7020033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Page AT, Falster MO, Litchfield M, et al. Polypharmacy among older Australians, 2006-2017: a population-based study. Med J Aust. 2019;211:71–5. https://doi.org/10.5694/mja2.50244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kennel PJ, Kneifati-Hayek J, Bryan J, et al. Prevalence and determinants of hyperpolypharmacy in adults with heart failure: an observational study from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2019;19:76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-019-1058-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Jokanovic N, Tan EC, Dooley MJ, et al. Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy in long-term care facilities: a systematic review. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2015;16:535.e1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamda.2015.03.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Khan N, Chattopadhyay K, Leonardi-Bee J. Incidence, prevalence, risk factors and health consequences of polypharmacy in adults in South Asia: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database Syst Rev Implement Rep. 2019;17:2370–7. https://doi.org/10.11124/JBISRIR-D-18-00001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kimura N, Miki A, Satoh H, et al. The process of surplus medicine accumulation by elderly Japanese patients with chronic disease: a qualitative study. Drug Discov Ther. 2018;12:283–90. https://doi.org/10.5582/ddt.2018.01044.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SJ, Han KT, Kang HG, et al. Toward safer prescribing: evaluation of a prospective drug utilization review system on inappropriate prescriptions, prescribing patterns, and adverse drug events and related health expenditure in South Korea. Public Health. 2018;163:128–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2018.06.009.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Overview of health care insurance system in Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw4/dl/health_and_medical_services/P26.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  25. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Conceptual chart of insured medical treatment in Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-hw4/dl/health_and_medical_services/P28.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  26. Sakoi M. Mechanism of medical reimbursement and revisions. J Jpn Soc Intern Med. 2016:2320–9. https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/naika/105/12/105_2320/_pdf. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  27. Hirano Y, Ii Y. Changes in prescription of psychotropic drugs after introduction of polypharmacy reduction policy in Japan based on a large-scale claims database. Clin Drug Investig. 2019;39:1077–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-019-00838-w.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The 2016 revision of medical fees. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000106421.html. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  29. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports & Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-10600000-Daijinkanboukouseikagakuka/0000080278.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  30. STROBE. STROBE Statement—checklist of items that should be included in reports of observational studies. https://www.strobe-statement.org/fileadmin/Strobe/uploads/checklists/STROBE_checklist_v4_combined.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  31. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The second NDB Open Data Instruction. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/file/06-Seisakujouhou-12400000-Hokenkyoku/0000193322.pdf. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  32. Hirose N, Ishimaru M, Morita K, et al. A review of studies using the Japanese national database of health insurance claims and specific health checkups. ACE. 2020;2:13–26. https://doi.org/10.37737/ace.2.1_13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. NDB Open Data in Japan. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000177182.html. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  34. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The 2014 revision of medical fees. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000032996.html. Accessed 9 September 2021

  35. Ishida T. White map drawing (in Japanese). Triangle Japan. Available from: https://n.freemap.jp/. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  36. Itoh H, Saito T, Nojiri S, et al. National burden of the pharmaceutical cost of wet compresses and its cost predictors: nationwide cross-sectional study in Japan. Health Econ Rev. 2019;9:20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13561-019-0238-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Ministry of Internal Aaffairs and Ccommunications. e-Stat. https://www.e-stat.go.jp/. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  38. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. List of Health, Labour and Welfare Statistics. https://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/itiran/index.html. Accessed 9 September 2021.

  39. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The Appropriate Use Guidelines of Medicines for Elderly https://www.mhlw.go.jp/content/11121000/kourei-tekisei_web.pdf. Accessed 9 September 202.1

  40. Lai SW, Lin CL, Lin CH. Long-term trend of polypharmacy in older people in Taiwan from 2000 to 2013. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2019;67:408–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Salive ME. Multimorbidity in older adults. Epidemiol Rev. 2013;35:75–83. https://doi.org/10.1093/epirev/mxs009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. The 2018 revision of medical fees (in Japanese). https://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/seisakunitsuite/bunya/0000188411.html. Accessed 9 September 2021.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Enago (www.enago.jp) for the English language review.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takehiro Ishida.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Takehiro Ishida is an employee of Bristol Myers Squibb KK.

Consent to participate

This study did not require informed consent for participation because all data used are publicly available anonymously aggregated data in accordance with the current Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan.

Consent for publication

This study did not require informed consent for publication because all data are publicly available anonymously aggregated data used in accordance with the current Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects in Japan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ishida, T., Yamaoka, K., Suzuki, A. et al. Effectiveness of polypharmacy reduction policy in Japan: nationwide retrospective observational study. Int J Clin Pharm 44, 357–365 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01347-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11096-021-01347-7

Keywords

Navigation