Abstract
This edited book brings together a collection of work from around the world in order to consider effective STEM education from a range of perspectives. This opening chapter outlines the key challenges in research, policy and practice for STEM education, from early childhood through to senior secondary education. The chapter describes the context for the development of the book, including the political and educational imperatives that underpin current approaches to STEM education around the world. Finally, it introduces the content of the chapters within the volume, noting the range, breadth and implications of various positions described by the chapter authors.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asunda, P. A., & Mativo, J. (2015). Integrated STEM: A new primer for teaching technology education. Technology and Engineering Teacher, 75(4), 8–16.
Australian Industry Group. (2013). Lifting our science, technology, engineering and maths (STEM) skills. Retrieved from http://www.kvab.be/Denkersprogramma/f2ks/Z-lifting%20our%20STEM%20skills%20Australia.pdf.
Australian Industry Group. (2015). Progressing STEM skills in Australia. Retrieved from http://cdn.aigroup.com.au/Reports/2015/14571_STEM_Skills_Report_Final_-.pdf.
Australian Industry Group. (2017). Strengthening school-industry STEM skills partnerships: Final project report. Retrieved from http://cdn.aigroup.com.au/Reports/2017/AiGroup_OCS_STEM_Report_2017.pdf.
Blackley, S., & Howell, J. (2015). A STEM narrative: 15 years in the making. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40(7).
Breiner, J. M., Harkness, S. S., Johnson, C. C., & Koehler, C. M. (2012). What is STEM? A discussion about conceptions of STEM in education and partnerships. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 3–11.
Bubnick, L., Enneking, K., & Egbers, J. (2016). Engineering encounters: Designing healthy ice pops. A STEM enrichment project for second graders incorporates nutrition and design principles. Science and Children, 54(1), 70–75.
Capraro, R., & Slough, S. (2013). Why PBL? Why STEM? Why now? An introduction to STEM project-based learning. In R. Capraro, M. Capraro, & J. Morgan (Eds.), STEM project-based learning (2nd ed.). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Cooper, G., Berry, A., & Baglin, J. (2018). Demographic predictors of students’ science participation over the age of 16: An Australian case study. Research in Science Education, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9692-0.
Council of Canadian Academies. (2015). Some assembly required: STEM skills and Canada’s economic productivity. Retrieved from Ottawa (ON), http://www.scienceadvice.ca/uploads/ENG/AssessmentsPublicationsNewsReleases/STEM/STEMFullReportEn.pdf.
Education Council. (2015). National STEM school education strategy 2016–2026. Retrieved from http://www.scseec.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/National%20STEM%20School%20Education%20Strategy.pdf.
European Centre for the Development of Vocational Training. (2014). EU skills panorama STEM skills analytical highlights. Retrieved from http://skillspanorama.cedefop.europa.eu/sites/default/files/EUSP_AH_STEM_0.pdf.
English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K-12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1.
Fensham, P. J. (2008). Science education policy-making: Eleven emerging issues. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001567/156700E.pdf.
Gee, K. A., & Wong, K. K. (2012). A cross national examination of inquiry and its relationship to student performance in science: Evidence from the program for international student assessment (PISA) 2006. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 303–318.
Goodrum, D., Druhan, A., & Abbs, J. (2012). The status and quality of year 11 and 12 science in Australian schools. Retrieved from https://www.science.org.au/files/userfiles/support/reports-and-plans/2015/year11and12report.pdf.
Gough, A. (2015). STEM policy and science education: Scientistic curriculum and sociopolitical silences. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(2), 445–458.
HM Treasury. (2011). The plan for growth. Retrieved from London, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/221514/2011budget_growth.pdf.
Johnston, J. (2011). The impact of home and school on early years scientific development. Education in Science, 245, 30–31.
Kelley, T. (2010). Staking the claim for the “T” in STEM. Journal of Technology Studies, 36(1), 2–11.
Marginson, S., Tytler, R., Freeman, B., & Roberts, K. (2013). STEM: Country comparisons. Report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies. Retrieved from http://dro.deakin.edu.au/eserv/DU:30059041/tytler-stemcountry-2013.pdf.
McPhan, G., Morony, W., Pegg, J., Cooksey, R., & Lynch, T. (2008). Maths? Why not?. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
Moore, T. J., Glancy, A. W., Tank, K. M., Kersten, J. A., Smith, K. A., & Stohlmann, M. S. (2014). A framework for quality k-12 engineering education: Research and development. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research, 4(1), 1–13.
Morgan, R., & Kirby, C. (2016). The UK STEM education landscape: A report for the Lloyd’s register foundation from the Royal Academy of Engineering education and skills committee. Royal Academy of Engineering. Retrieved February 23, 2018, from https://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/uk-stem-education-landscape.
Morrison, J., Roth McDuffie, A., & French, B. (2015). Identifying key components of teaching and learning in a STEM school. School Science and Mathematics, 115(5), 244–255.
Murphy, S., MacDonald, A., Wang, C., & Danaia, L. (2019). Towards an understanding of STEM engagement: A review of the literature on motivation and academic emotions. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42330-019-00054-w.
Myers, A. P., & Berkowicz, J. (2015). The STEM shift. Thousand Oaks, United States: SAGE Publications.
National Science and Technology Council. (2013). Federal science, technology, engineering and mathematics (STEM) education: 5-year strategic plan. Retrieved from Washington, D.C., https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/stem_stratplan_2013.pdf.
OECD. (2018). PISA 2015: Results in focus. Retrieved from Paris, France, https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.
Office of the Chief Scientist. (2013). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics in the national interest: A strategic approach. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/STEMstrategy290713FINALweb.pdf.
Office of the Chief Scientist. (2014). Science, technology, engineering and mathematics: Australia’s future. Retrieved from http://www.chiefscientist.gov.au/wp-content/uploads/STEM_AustraliasFuture_Sept2014_Web.pdf.
Perry, B., MacDonald, A., & Gervasoni, A. (Eds.). (2015). Mathematics and transition to school: International perspectives. Singapore: Springer.
Shanahan, M.-C., Burke, L. E., & Francis, K. (2016). Using a boundary object perspective to reconsider the meaning of STEM in a Canadian context. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 16(2), 129–139.
Thomson, S., De Bortoli, L., & Underwood, C. (2017). PISA 2015: Reporting Australia’s results. Retrieved from Camberwell, Victoria, https://research.acer.edu.au/ozpisa/22/.
Thomson, S., Wernert, N., O’Grady, E., & Rodrigues, S. (2017). TIMSS 2015: Reporting Australia’s results. Retrieved from Camberwell, Victoria, https://research.acer.edu.au/timss_2015/2/.
Tytler, R., Osborne, J., Williams, G., Tytler, K., & Cripps Clark, J. (2008). Opening up pathways: Engagement in STEM across the primary-secondary school transition. A review of the literature concerning supports and barriers to science, technology, engineering and mathematics engagement at primary-secondary transition. Australian Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.
UNESCO. (2015). Incheon declaration and framework for action for the implementation of sustainable development Goal 4. Retrieved from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002456/245656E.pdf.
Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J., Siegler, R. S., & Davis-Kean, P. E. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360.
Williams, P. J. (2011). STEM education: Proceed with caution. Design and Technology Education, 16(1), 26–35.
Zollman, A. (2012). Learning for STEM literacy: STEM literacy for learning. School Science and Mathematics, 112(1), 12–19.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
MacDonald, A., Danaia, L., Murphy, S. (2020). Introduction. In: MacDonald, A., Danaia, L., Murphy, S. (eds) STEM Education Across the Learning Continuum. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-2821-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-2820-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-2821-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)