Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Operative Surgical Oncology in the Elderly: Epidemiology, Opportunity, Outcome, and Ethical Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Surgical Decision Making in Geriatrics

  • 388 Accesses

Abstract

With the expected rise in the geriatric patient population, delivery of healthcare for elderly patients will require more resources in the next several decades. The development of cancer is more common in the geriatric population since two-thirds of cancers are typically discovered in the elderly. The elderly often have associated medical comorbidities. Treatment of the geriatric patient population will encompass more personalized approaches based on their functional status. Surgical management of elderly cancer patients is complex. Not only does it require incorporation of multimodality care, the treating physician needs to balance risks and benefits from options available due to patient medical comorbidities leading to posttreatment debilitation and side effect profiles. Furthermore, there are also insufficient studies in the elderly population in terms of long-term oncologic follow-up as many studies frequently exclude the elderly in their study designs. With the development of newer modalities of treatment such as ablative procedures, minimally invasive approaches, and immunotherapy, the selection of treatment methods will need to balance optimal oncologic outcome with expected patient survival.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Cancer Institute. Cancer prevalence and cost of care projections external. Accessed 30 May 2019.

  2. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2016, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2016/, based on November 2018 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2019.

  3. Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Li D, Yuan Y, et al. Functional versus chronological age: geriatric assessments to guide decision making in older patients with cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2018;19:e305–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30348-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bluethmann SM, Mariotto AB, Rowland JH. Anticipating the ‘Silver Tsunami’: prevalence trajectories and co-morbidity burden among older cancer survivors in the United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev. 2016;25:1029–36. https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bentrem DJ, Cohen ME, Hynes DM, et al. Identification of specific quality improvement opportunities for the elderly undergoing gastrointestinal surgery. Arch Surg. 2009;144:1013–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Miller KD, Siegel RL, Lin CC, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66:271–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mariotto AB, Wang Z, Klabunde C, et al. Life tables adjusted for comorbidity more accurately estimate noncancer survival for recently diagnosed cancer patients. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:1376–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.07.002.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, et al. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010-2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djq495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Yeo HL, O’Mahoney PRA, Lachs M, et al. Surgical oncology outcomes in the aging US population. J Surg Res. 2016;205:11–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Finlayson E, Fan Z, Birkmeyer JD. Outcomes in octogenarians undergoing high risk cancer operation: a national study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007;205(6):729–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Henderson WG, et al. Major cancer surgery in the elderly: results from the American College of Surgeons national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2010;251:311–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Gestel YR, Lemmens VE, de Hingh IH, et al. Influence of comorbidity and age on 1-, 2-, and 3-month postoperative mortality rates in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:371–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Neri S, Gardini A, Facchini A, et al. Mismatch repair system and aging: microsatellite instability in peripheral blood cells from differently aged participants. J Gerontol. 2005;60:285–92. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/60.3.285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Loh KP, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Hsu T, et al. What every oncologist should know about geriatric assessment for older patients with cancer: Young International Society of Geriatric Oncology position paper. J Oncol Pract. 2018;14:85–94. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2017.026435.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fagard K, Leonard S, Deschodt M, et al. The impact of frailty on postoperative outcomes in individuals aged 65 and over undergoing elective surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review. J Geriat Oncol. 2016;7:479–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ghignone F, van Leeuwen BL, Montroni I, et al. The assessment and management of older cancer patients: a SIOG surgical task force survey on surgeons’ attitudes. EJSO. 2016;42:297–302.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Janssen-Heijnen ML, Maas HA, Houterman S. Comorbidity in older surgical cancer patients: influence on patient care and outcome. Eur J Cancer. 2007;43:2179–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, et al. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:865–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hamel MB, Hendrson WG, Khuri SF, et al. Surgical outcomes for patients aged 80 and older: morbidity and mortality from major noncardiac surgery. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:424–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gajdos C, Kile D, Hawn MT, et al. Advancing age and 30-day adverse outcomes after nonemergent general surgeries. J Am Geriatr. 2013;61:1608–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maekawa Y, Sugimoto K, Yamasaki M, et al. Comprehensive geriatric assessment is a useful predictive tool for postoperative delirium after gastrointestinal surgery in old-old adults. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2016;16:1036–42. https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12587.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Griebling TL. Re: geriatric assessment in surgical oncology: a systematic review. J Urol. 2016;195:1079–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2015.12.060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, et al. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:373–83.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Velanovich V, Antoine H, Swartz A, et al. Accumulating deficits model of frailty and postoperative mortality and morbidity: its application to a national database. J Surg Res. 2013;183:103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Dripps RD. New classification of physical status. Anesthesiology. 1963;24:111.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Scott S, Lund JN, Gold S, et al. An evaluation of POSSUM and P-POSSUM scoring in predicting post-operative mortality in a level 1 critical care setting. BMC Anesthesiol. 2014;14:104. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-104.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Ceccarelli G, Andolfi E, Biancafarina A, et al. Robot-assisted surgery in elderly and very elderly population: our experience in oncologic and general surgery with literature review. Aging Clin Exp Res. 2017;29:55–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0676-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weber DM. Laparoscopic surgery – an excellent approach in elderly patients. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1083–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Caglia P, Tracia A, Buffone A, et al. Physiopathology and clinical considerations of laparoscopic surgery in the elderly. Int J Surg. 2016;33:S97–S102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Amelung FJ, Borstlap WAA, Consten ECJ, et al. Propensity score-matched analysis of oncological outcome between stent as bridge to surgery and emergency resection in patients with malignant left-sided colonic obstruction. Br J Surg. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.11172.

  31. Chesney T, Acuna SA. Do elderly patients have the most to gain from laparoscopic surgery? Ann Med Surg. 2015;4:321–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bellio G, Troian M, Pasquali A, et al. Outcomes of laparoscopic surgery for pT3/pT4 colorectal cancer in young vs. old patients. Minerva Chir. 2019; https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.19.07895-7.

  33. Giuliani A, Ceccarelli G, Rocca A, et al. The role of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy in elderly patients. Minerva Chir. 2018;73:179–87. https://doi.org/10.23736/S0026-4733.18.07594-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ciria R, Gomez-Luque I, Ocana S, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the short- and long-term outcomes for laparoscopic and open liver resections for hepatocellular carcinoma: updated results from the European guidelines meeting on laparoscopic liver surgery, Southampton, UK, 2017. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017;26:252–63. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6926-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen K, Pan Y, Maher H, et al. Laparoscopic hepatectomy for elderly patients – major findings based on a systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine. 2018;97(30):1–12. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.000000000011703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Bandoh T, Isoyama T, Toyoshima H. Total gastrectomy for gastric cancer in the elderly. Surgery. 1991;109(2):136–42.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bourcier K, Dinart D, Le Cesne A, et al. Outcome of patients with soft-tissue sarcomas: an age-specific conditional survival analysis. Oncologist. 2019;24(7):3559–e564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fong Y, Blumgart LH, Forner JG, et al. Pancreatic or liver resection for malignancy is safe and effective for the elderly. Ann Surg. 1995;222:426–37.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Poon RT, Law SY, Chu KM, et al. Esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagus in the elderly: results of current surgical management. Ann Surg. 1998;227:357–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ellis FH Jr, Williamson WA, Heatley GJ. Cancer of the esophagus and cardia: does age influence treatment selection and surgical outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 1998;187:345–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Frakes JM, Strom T, Springett GM, et al. Resected pancreatic cancer outcomes in the elderly. J Geriatr Oncol. 2015;6:127–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Kishida N, Hibi T, Itano O, et al. Validation of hepatectomy for elderly patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3094–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Makary MA, Winter JM, Cameron JL, et al. Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the very elderly. J Gastrointest Surg. 2006;10:347–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Daher M. Ethical issues in the geriatric patient with advanced cancer ‘living to the end’. Ann Oncol. 2013;23:vii55–vii58. Supplement 7.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Willmott L, White B, Gallois C, et al. Reasons doctors provide futile treatment at the end of life: a qualitative study. J Med Ethics. 2016;42:496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Chiabi P, Magne N, Breton S, et al. Influence of geriatric consultation with comprehensive geriatric assessment on final therapeutic decision in elderly cancer patients. Crit Rev Oncol/Hem. 2011;79:302–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Terret C, Zulian G, Droz JP. Statements on the interdependence between the oncologist and the geriatrician in geriatric oncology. Crit Rev Oncol/Hem. 2004;52:127–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA

    Xiang Da Dong

  2. Department of Pathology, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA

    Samuel Barasch

Authors
  1. Xiang Da Dong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Samuel Barasch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xiang Da Dong .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, New York Medical College, School of Medicine and Westchester Medical Center Health Network, Valhalla, NY, USA

    Rifat Latifi

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Da Dong, X., Barasch, S. (2020). Operative Surgical Oncology in the Elderly: Epidemiology, Opportunity, Outcome, and Ethical Issues. In: Latifi, R. (eds) Surgical Decision Making in Geriatrics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47963-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47963-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47962-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47963-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation