Abstract
The 21st century calls us to solve wicked problems that are related to sustainable development (SD). The complex and multi-disciplinary nature of SD requires collaboration in and between disciplines, education, and the wider local and global communities. In the present study, connected learning is used as an approach to enable international students’ participation in collective activities where people from heterogeneous backgrounds can connect and pursue varying complex and multifaceted problems together. Through qualitative content analysis of video messages, we illustrate the nature of the questions of 13–17-year-old participants in the World Summit of Students for Climate (WSSC) on SD and the types of actions they think are needed to solve these questions. The results of this study illustrate that the questions created by the students are factual, explanatory, and ethical by nature, and focus on a variety of perspectives related to SD. The actions created by the students require active agency at the individual, community and society levels. The number of different objects of the students’ questions and actions illustrates their perceptions that actions should target many different areas of SD. We conclude with discussions on the significance of creating possibilities to promote the development of necessary competencies in current education.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Subsequently referred to as glocal.
References
Burla, L., Knierim, B., Barth, J., Liewald, K., Duetz, M., & Abel, T. (2008). From text to codings. Nursing Research, 57(2), 113–117.
Campbell, J., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. (2013). Coding in-depth semistructured interviews. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320.
Chi, M. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analyses of verbal data: A practical guide. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.
Clinton, K., Jenkins, H., & McWilliams, J. (2013). New literacies in an age of participatory culture. In K. Jenkins (Ed.), Reading in a participatory culture: Remixing Moby-Dick in the English classroom (pp. 3–23). Clinton: McWilliams, Pitts-Wiley and Reilly, Teachers College Press, New York, NY.
Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5–8.
ENO Schoolnet Association. (2019). World summit of students for climate. Retrieved June 11, 2019, from https://wssc.enoprogramme.org/home.
Finnish Advisory Board on Research Integrity [Tutkimuseettinen neuvottelukunta]. (2012). Hyvä tieteellinen käytäntö ja sen loukkausten käsitteleminen Suomessa [Responsible conduct of research and procedures for handling allegations of misconduct in Finland]. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from http://www.tenk.fi/sites/tenk.fi/files/HTK_ohje_2012.pdf.
Hakkarainen, K. (1998). Epistemology of inquiry and computer-supported collaborative Learning. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. University of Toronto.
Hakkarainen, K. (2010). Communities of learning in the classroom. In K. Littleton, C. Wood, & J. Kleine Staarman (Eds.), International handbook of psychology in education (pp. 177–225). Bingley, UK: Emerald. Retrieved Jan 28, 2014, from https://www.academia.edu/350358/Draft_of_Hakkarainen_K_2010_Communities_of_learning_in_the_classroom.
Hakkarainen, K., & Paavola, S. (2009). Toward a trialogical approach to learning. In D. Schwarz & R. Hershkowitz (Eds.), Transformation of knowledge through classroom interaction (pp. 65–80). London: England.
Hakkarainen, K., Paavola, S., Kangas, K., & Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P. (2013). Socio-cultural perspectives on collaborative learning: Towards collaborative knowledge creation. In C. Hmelo-Silver, C. Chinn, C. Chan, & A. O'Donnell (Eds.), International handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 57–73). New York: Routledge.
Hennessy, S., & Murphy, P. (1999). The potential for collaborative problem solving in design and technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 9(1), 1–36.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E., & Barrows, H. S. (2008). Facilitating collaborative knowledge building. Cognition and Instruction, 26(1), 48–94.
Ito, M., Gutiérrez, K., Livingstone, S., Penuel, B., Rhodes, J., Salen, K., et al. (2013). Connected learning: An agenda for research and design. Irvine, CA: Digital Media and Learning Research Hub.
Jenkins, H., Clinton, C., Purushotma, R., Robison, A. J., & Weigel, M. (2008). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Chicago, IL: John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from http://www.nwp.org/cs/public/print/resource/2713.
Jenkins, H., Ito, M., & Boyd, D. (2016). Participatory culture in a networked era. Cambridge, MA: Polity.
Kafai, Y., & Peppler, K. (2011). Youth, technology, and DIY: Developing participatory competencies in creative media production. Review of Research in Education, 35(3), 89–119.
Kangas, K., Seitamaa-Hakkarainen, P., & Hakkarainen, K. (2007). The Artifact Project. History, science and design inquiry in technology enhanced learning at elementary level. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 2(3), 213–237.
Krajcik, J., & Blumenfeld, P. (2006). Project-based learning. In Sawyer, K. (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 317–333). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Reliability in content analysis: Some common misconceptions and recommendations. Human Communication Research, 30(3), 411–433.
Kumpulainen, K., & Sefton-Green, J. (2014). What is connected learning and how to research it? International Journal of Learning and Media.
Liljeström, A., Enkenberg, J., Vanninen, P., Vartiainen, H., & Pöllänen, S. (2014). The openforest portal as an open learning ecosystem: Co-developing in the study of a multidisciplinary phenomenon in a cultural context. International Association for the Development of the Information Society.
Lombardi, M. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause Learning Initiative, 1(2007), 1–12.
Moll, L. C., Amanti, C., Neff, D., & Gonzalez, N. (1992). Funds of knowledge for teaching: Using a qualitative approach to connect homes and classrooms. Theory into Practice, 31(2), 132–141.
Nissinen, S., Vartiainen, H., Vanninen, P., & Pöllänen, S. (2019a). Connected learning in international learning projects: Emergence of a hybrid learning system. International Journal of Information and Learning Technology.
Nissinen, S., Vartiainen, H., Vanninen, P., & Pöllänen, S. (2019b). Connected learning projects in glocal networks: Teachers’ insights. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2017). Investing in climate, investing in growth. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://read.oecd-ilibrary.org/economics/investing-in-climate-investing-in-growth_9789264273528-en#page3.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2018). The future of education and skills, education 2030. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf.
Roth, W.-M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88, 263–291.
Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R., & Quellmalz, E. (2011). New assessments and environments for knowledge building. In Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills (Eds.) Griffin, McGaw, and Care (pp. 231–300). New York, NY: Springer.
Tobin, K. (2016). Collaborating on global priorities: Science education for everyone—Any time and everywhere. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 27–40.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2005). Guidelines and recommendations for reorienting teacher education to address sustainability. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000143370.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2009). Review of contexts and structures for education for sustainable development: Learning for a sustainable world. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0018/001877/187757e.pdf.
UNESCO (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation). (2017). Education for sustainable development goals learning objectives. Retrieved August 14, 2019, from https://www.iau-hesd.net/sites/default/files/documents/247444e.pdf.
Vartiainen, H., Nissinen, S., Pöllänen, S., & Vanninen, P. (2018). Teachers’ insights into connected learning networks: Emerging activities and forms of participation. AERA Open, 4(3).
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank ENO Schoolnet Association and the participating students for enabling this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nissinen, S., Saramäki, K., Vartiainen, H. (2020). Connected Peer Learning in Global Networks: Students’ Questions About and Solutions for a Sustainable Future. In: Issa, T., Issa, T., Issa, T.B., Isaias, P. (eds) Sustainability Awareness and Green Information Technologies. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47975-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-47975-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-47974-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-47975-6
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)