Abstract
We start from the conceptual interconnection between Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility, which, although continuously subject to controversy, both within the scope of its definition and in its performance, advocate, as the ultimate goal, human development and of the society in general, promoting the interests of the Communities on a permanent, long-term basis and without compromising the options of the future generations. In this context, we cannot fail to draw a parallel with the entities that constitute the Social Economy Sector. The activities they carry out are of economic and social nature and must be pursued in the general interest of their members, users and beneficiaries, thus in the general interest of the Community. These institutions also reveal concerns about the sustainability in all the dimensions involved (economic, social and environmental), in which the organizational performance is particularly important, as it becomes imperative to guarantee their continuity, fostering and promoting their social action. We will, therefore, start by framing what is meant by Sustainability, Corporate Social Responsibility and Social Economy, with a particular focus on the current requirements of stakeholders regarding the socially responsible behaviour of the institutions as these, in turn, will entail the adoption of more comprehensive management tools, also more efficient and transparent concerning all dimensions (economic, financial and social). It is within this framework that a project called “TFA—TheoFrameAccountability—Theoretical framework for the promotion of accountability in the social economy sector: The IPSS case” emerges, being promoted by the University of Aveiro, with the participation of National Confederation of Solidarity Institutions (CNIS—acronym in Portuguese), and the Polytechnic Institutes of Coimbra and Porto. This project aims to promote the accountability of the social economy sector (economic, financial and social aspects), in the Private Social Solidarity Institutions (IPSS—acronym in Portuguese), assisting them not only in fulfilling their legal obligations, but also facilitating the reporting of results of activities carried out in a more effective manner and promoting transfer of knowledge (for the IPSS and also for the academic community), thus contributing to the development and sustainability of these institutions. Thus, we develop an exploratory and descriptive analysis, of a quantitative-qualitative nature, in which the procedures of data collection determine the result of the search strategy by the defined descriptors. For this purpose, the analysis will focus on the following variables: number of articles published per year; methodologies used; theories of support; identification by sector/area of activity; countries of origin; more representative institutions; authors who publish more and journals with the largest number of publications. The main results indicate a growing concern about sustainability and a growing publication in this area. This paper presents a bibliometric study to evaluate the main trends of current research on sustainability and on corporate social responsibility, thus contributing to the construction of the theoretical basis underlying the “TFA—TheoFrameAccountability” project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Entities designed on article no. 4 of LBES.
- 2.
The Sustainable Adjusted Global Competitiveness Index (GCI) is created, reflecting a set of institutions, policies and factors that make a nation stay productive over time while ensuring social and environmental sustainability.
- 3.
The main purpose of accountability is to prepare and provide internal and external information about the entity’s management and its equity situation. Failure to comply with the obligation to present the accounts within the set deadlines has serious consequences for the entity (EIPSS—no. 5 of Article 14-A).
References
Azevedo, C. & Couto P. (2010). O desafio da sustentabilidade nas OSFL e as finanças locais. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 371–405). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Bansal, P. & DesJardine, M. R. (2014). Business sustainability: It is about time. Strategic Organization, 12(1), 70–78.
BCSD – Business Council for Sustainable Development (2013a). Agenda 2020 in Conferência Anual, em novembro 25, 2013, em Lisboa.
BCSD – Business Council for Sustainable Development (2013b). Ação 2020. Versão eletrónica. Recuperado em 2013, novembro 25, de http://www.bcsdportugal.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/10.
BCSD – Business Council for Sustainable Development (2019). A Sustentabilidade em 2019. Retrieved from https://www.bcsdportugal.org/sustentabilidade/sustentabilidade. Accessed 22 May 2019.
Calleros Islas, A. (2012). Sustainability frameworks: their influence on the operational capacity of sustainability. Revista Internacional de Sostenibilidad, Tecnología y Humanismo, no,7, 9–26.
CASES – Cooperativa António Sérgio para a Economia Social (2016). Contas Satélite da economia nacional. Retrieved from http://www.cases.pt/atividades/contasatelitedaes. Accessed 22 May 2019.
CASES – Cooperativa António Sérgio para a Economia Social (2019). Contas Satélite da economia nacional. Retrieved from http://www.cases.pt/atividades/contasatelitedaes. Accessed 22 July 2019.
Castelo-Branco, M. (2006). Essays on corporate social responsibility and disclosure. Tese de Doutoramento: Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
Comissão das Comunidades Europeias (2001). Livro Verde: Fomentar um marco europeu para a responsabilidade social das empresas. Retrieved from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/. Accessed 28 Oct 2013.
Comissão Europeia (2013). Promover a responsabilidade social das empresas. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu. Accessed 28 Oct 2013.
Dimaggio, P. & Powell, W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American sociological review, 48(2), 147–160.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple Bottom line. 21st Century Business. Capstone, Oxford, pp. 402 ISBN 1-900961-27-X.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management – A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business into increase its profits. NY Times Magazine, setembro 1970.
Gonçalves, R. H. (2010). A fiscalidade nas OSFL. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pág. 409–440). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Heal, G. (2005). – Corporate social responsibility: An economic and financial framework. The Geneva papers on risk and insurance,30, 387–409.
INE – Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2013). Contas satélite da Economia Social 2013. Retrieved from http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_cnacionais. Accessed 03 Oct 2013.
INE – Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2016). Contas satélite da Economia Social 2016. Retrieved from https://www.ine.pt/ngt_server/attachfileu.jsp?look_parentBoui=279959375&att_display=n&att_download=y. Accessed 05 Nov 2018.
INE – Instituto Nacional de Estatística (2019). ODS. Indicadores para Portugal. Agenda 2030. retrieved from https://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_publicacoes&PUBLICACOESpub_boui=332274994&PUBLICACOESmodo=2&xlang=pt. Accessed 22 May 2019.
Jamali, D. & Mirshak, R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): theory and practice in a developing country context. Journal of business ethics, 72, 243–262.
Lopes, S., Costa, M., Fernández, F., Amante, M. & Lopes, P. (2012). A Bibliometria e a Avaliação da Produção Científica: indicadores e ferramentas. Versão eletrónica. Acedido em 19 de janeiro de 2019, em: https://www.bad.pt/publicacoes/index.php/congressosbad/article/view/429.
Martins, M. A. & Pinheiro S. F. (2010). Empreendedorismo e inovação social. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 127–132). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Martins, R. (2010). Comunicação nas OSFL. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 269–305). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Meira, D. A. (2011). A responsabilidade social da empresa cooperativa: uma análise jurídica e intercultural. In Diálogos interculturais: os novos rumos da viagem, Vida Económica, pp. 293–305.
Meira, D. A. (2012). Cooperative social responsibility: An Intercultural Analysis. In C. Sarmento, S. Brusaca, & S. Sousa (Eds.), In permanent transit: Discourses and maps of the intercultural experience (pp. 127–144). Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Meneses, J. W. (2010). Liderança e Gestão de OSFL. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.) (2010), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 135–161). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. The American Journal of Sociology,83(2), 340–363.
Mulgan, G., Tucker S., Ali R. & Sanders B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship Working Paper. Retrieved from http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/Social-Innovation-what-it-is-why-it-matters-how-it-can-be-accelerated-March-2007. Accessed 02 Nov 2014.
Neto, F. P. M., & Froes, C. (1999). Responsabilidade social e cidadania empresarial: A administração do terceiro sector. Rio de Janeiro: Qualitymark.
OECD (2010). SMEs, entrepreneurship. Innovative SMEs and Entrepreneurship for Job Creation and Growth. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/cfe/smes/46404350.pdf. Accessed 02 Nov 2014.
ONU – Organização das Nações Unidas (1987). Relatório Brundtland: “Our Common Future”: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development. Retrieved from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf. Accessed 13 Jan 2014.
ONU – Transforming our World (2019). The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. Retrieved from https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/21252030%20Agenda%20for%20Sustainable%20Development%20web.pdf. Accessed 23 May 2019.
Oliveira, B., & Gouvêa, M. A. (2011). A emergência da comunicação das acções de responsabilidade social empresarial. Comunicação, Mídia e Consumo,8(22), 147–165.
Pereira, C. (2013) Importância da avaliação de desempenho nas organizações. Estudo de caso numa empresa portuguesa do sector alimentar. Dissertação de Mestrado. Instituto Politécnico do Porto-Escola Superior de Estudos Industriais e de Gestão. Porto, Portugal.
Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2011). The big Idea. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review,89(1/2), 62–77.
Roque, A. (2010). Partes interessadas. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 209–228). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Sartori, S., Latrônico, F., & Campos, L. M. S. (2014). Sustentabilidade e desenvolvimento sustentável: Uma taxonomia no campo da literatura. Ambiente & Sociedade,17(1), 1–22.
Schaltegger, S., Hansen, E. G. & Lüdeke-Freunde, F. (2016). Business models for sustainability: Origins, present research and future avenues. Organization & Environment, 29(1), 3–10.
Souza, J. A., & Costa, T. M. T. (2012). Responsabilidade social empresarial e desenvolvimento sustentável: Conceito, práticas e desafios para a contabilidade. Organizações em contexto,8(15), 213–238.
Stahel, W. A., & Cendra Garreta, J. (2011). Desarollo sostenible: ¿Sabemos de qué estamos hablando? Algunos criterios para un uso consistente del término sostenibilidade aplicado al desarrollo a partir de una perspectiva sistémica. Revista Internacional de Sostenibilidad, Tecnología y Humanismo, no,6, 37–57.
Strand, R., Freeman, R. E., & Hockerts, K. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in Scandinavia: An Overview. Journal of Business Ethics, no,127, 1–15.
Teixeira, P. (2010). Avaliação nas OSFL. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 441–463). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Teixeira, S. (2005). O processo de controlo. Gestão das organizações, (2ª Edição) (pp. 210–223). Madrid: Editora McGraw-Hill Interamericana de España S.A.U.
Tomé, M. B., Meira, D. A. & Bandeira, A. M. (2016). Main challenges of Portuguese social solidarity cooperatives facing the new statute of private institutions of social solidarity. Paper presented at the XVI meeting of the CIRIEC-ESPAÑA’s Researchers on Social Economy, Valencia, Spain.
Torre, P. R. (2005). Responsabilidad social corporativa. Responsabilidad social Corporativa: aspectos jurídico-económicos (pp. 63–98). Casteló de la Plana: Publicaticións de la Universitat Jaume I. Servei de Comunicació i Publicacións.
Vasconcelos, D. C. (2010). Inovação Social, a agenda do futuro. In C. Azevedo, R. Franco & J. W. Meneses (Coord.), Gestão de Organizações sem fins lucrativos: o desafio da inovação social, (pp. 31–50). Porto: Imoedições – Edições Periódicas e Multimédia, Lda. (Grupo Editorial Vida Económica).
Velasco, G. E. (2005). Interés social, buen gobierno y responsabilidade social corporativa. Responsabilidad social Corporativa: aspectos jurídico-económicos (pp. 13–62). Casteló de la Plana: Publicaticións de la Universitat Jaume I. Servei de Comunicació i Publicacións.
WBCSD - World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2013a). Action 2020. Versão eletrónica. Recuperado em 2013, novembro, 04, de http://www.wbcsd.org/action2020.aspx.
WBCSD – World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2013b). Vision 2050. Versão eletrónica. Recuperado em 2013, novembro, 04, de http://www.wbcsd.org/pages/edocument/edocumentdetails.aspx.ID.
WBCSD - World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2019). How we drive Sustainable Development. Retrieved from http://www.wbcsd.org. Accessed 02 May 2019.
Consulted Legislation
Constituição da República Portuguesa (1976). Edições Almedina, SA. GC Gráfica de Coimbra, Lda. (2009) = Portuguese Constitution.
Decree Law no. 172-A/2014 14th November, Diário da República no. 221 – 1st serie, Assembleia da República, Lisboa = (EIPSS) IPSS Statute.
Law no. 30/2013 8th May, Diário da República no. 88 – 1st serie, Assembleia da República, Lisboa. (LBES) – Basic Law for Social Economy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tomé, B., Bandeira, A.M., Azevedo, G., Costa, A.J. (2020). Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility in the Perspective of Social Economy Entities: A Bibliometric Study. In: Crowther, D., Seifi, S. (eds) CSR and Sustainability in the Public Sector. Approaches to Global Sustainability, Markets, and Governance. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6366-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6366-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-6365-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-6366-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)