Skip to main content

Assisting the RDF Annotation of a Digital Humanities Corpus Using Case-Based Reasoning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
The Semantic Web – ISWC 2020 (ISWC 2020)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 12507))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The Henri Poincaré correspondence is a corpus composed of around 2100 letters which is a rich source of information for historians of science. Semantic Web technologies provide a way to structure and publish data related to this kind of corpus. However, Semantic Web data editing is a process which often requires human intervention and may seem tedious for the user. This article introduces , an editor which aims at facilitating annotation of documents. This tool uses case-based reasoning (cbr) to provide suggestions for the user which are related to the current document annotation process. These suggestions are found and ranked by considering the annotation context related to the resource currently being edited and by looking for similar resources already annotated in the database. Several methods and combinations of methods are presented here, as well as the evaluation associated with each of them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://henripoincare.fr.

  2. 2.

    Turtle is a rdf serialization which is easily readable  [8].

  3. 3.

    https://videos.ahp-numerique.fr/videos/watch/0d544e5b-b4be-423e-9497-216f29ab44f3.

  4. 4.

    If a fact is not asserted, it does not imply that this fact is false. In this situation, there may exist a resource r that is intended to represent a person (resp. institution) but is such that the triple \(\langle r~~\texttt {a}~~\texttt {Person}\rangle \) (resp. \(\langle r~~\texttt {a}~~\texttt {Institution}\rangle \)) cannot be entailed by the current rdfs base. Therefore, r can be suggested as well, though further in the suggestion list.

  5. 5.

    At the time of writing this article, there are around 1800 persons defined within the database.

  6. 6.

    This suggestion could be removed if the system knows that the recipient of a letter cannot be its sender. This is considered again in the future work part of this article conclusion.

References

  1. Aamodt, A., Plaza, E.: Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Commun. 7(1), 39–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Allen, I.E., Seaman, C.A.: Likert scales and data analyses. Qual. Prog. 40(7), 64–65 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bernstein, A., Kaufmann, E.: GINO – a guided input natural language ontology editor. In: Cruz, I., et al. (eds.) ISWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4273, pp. 144–157. Springer, Heidelberg (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/11926078_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Boulaire, C., Carabelli, R.: Du digital naive au bricoleur numérique: les images et le logiciel Omeka. In: Cavalié, É., Clavert, F., Legendre, O., Martin, D. (eds.) Expérimenter les humanités numériques. Des outils individuels aux projets collectifs. Les Presses de l’Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, pp. 81–103 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brickley, D., Guha, R.V.: RDF Schema 1.1, W3C recommendation (2014). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/. Accessed Aug 2020

  6. Bruneau, O., Gaillard, E., Lasolle, N., Lieber, J., Nauer, E., Reynaud, J.: A SPARQL query transformation rule language—application to retrieval and adaptation in case-based reasoning. In: Aha, D.W., Lieber, J. (eds.) ICCBR 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10339, pp. 76–91. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61030-6_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruneau, O., Lasolle, N., Lieber, J., Nauer, E., Pavlova, S., Rollet, L.: Applying and developing semantic web technologies for exploiting a corpus in history of science: the case study of the Henri Poincaré correspondence. Semant. Web. IOS Press Journal (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carothers, G., Prud’hommeaux, E.: RDF 1.1 Turtle (2014). http://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-turtle-20140225/. Accessed Aug 2020

  9. Corby, O., Dieng-Kuntz, R., Faron Zucker, C.: Querying the semantic web with corese search engine. In: López de Mántaras, R., Saitta, L. (eds.) European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Valence, Spain, pp. 705–709, August 2004

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cordier, A., et al.: Taaable: a case-based system for personalized cooking. In: Montani, S., Jain, L.C. (eds.) Successful Case-Based Reasoning Applications-2. SCI, vol. 494, pp. 121–162. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38736-4_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Hermann, A., Ferré, S., Ducassé, M.: An interactive guidance process supporting consistent updates of RDFS graphs. In: ten Teije, A., et al. (eds.) EKAW 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7603, pp. 185–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33876-2_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Manola, F., Miller, E., McBride, B., et al.: RDF Primer (2004). https://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-primer. Accessed Aug 2020

  13. McBride, B.: Jena: a Semantic Web toolkit. IEEE Internet Comput. 6(6), 55–59 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Noy, N.F., Sintek, M., Decker, S., Crubézy, M., Fergerson, R.W., Musen, M.A.: Creating semantic web contents with Protégé-2000. IEEE Intell. Syst. 16(2), 60–71 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Poincaré, H.: La Science et l’Hypothèse. Flammarion, Paris (1902)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Prud’hommeaux, E.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF, W3C Recommendation (2008). http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/. Accessed Aug 2020

  17. Riesbeck, C.K., Schank, R.C.: Inside Case-Based Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc., Hillsdale (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Smyth, B.: Case-based recommendation. In: Brusilovsky, P., Kobsa, A., Nejdl, W. (eds.) The Adaptive Web. LNCS, vol. 4321, pp. 342–376. Springer, Heidelberg (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-72079-9_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partly by the french PIA project “Lorraine Université d’Excellence”, reference ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUE. It was also supported by the CPER LCHN (Contrat de Plan État-Région Lorrain “Langues, Connaissances et Humanités Numériques”) that financed engineer Ismaël Bada who participated to this project. We greatly thank Mickaël Smodis who is a final user of the tool and who participated to the human evaluation and Laurent Rollet who provided us with unpublished letters of the Henri Poincaré correspondence.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Lasolle .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Lasolle, N., Bruneau, O., Lieber, J., Nauer, E., Pavlova, S. (2020). Assisting the RDF Annotation of a Digital Humanities Corpus Using Case-Based Reasoning. In: Pan, J.Z., et al. The Semantic Web – ISWC 2020. ISWC 2020. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 12507. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_38

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-62466-8_38

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-62465-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-62466-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics