Skip to main content

Ontology-Based Conceptualisation of Text Mining Practice Areas for Education

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computational Collective Intelligence (ICCCI 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11684))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Text mining is highly multi-disciplinary field including various techniques of text analysis. These techniques are used for uncovering hidden information and knowledge in semi-structured and non-structured texts. Text mining concepts are spread among different, but related practice areas. It is often difficult to receive fast insight into this amount of concepts for a non-professional, e.g. for a student. The paper presents the OWL ontology-based prototype which should ease education and learning of facts which are used in the text mining domain. It is mainly aimed to the university students studying text mining at the introductory level. It can also be used as a formal vocabulary of text mining concepts for understanding of methods, techniques, concepts and relations between them by machines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Miner, G., et al.: Practical Text Mining and Statistical Analysis for Non-Structured Text Data Applications, 1st edn. Academic Press, Orlando (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Allahyari, M., et al.: A brief survey of text mining: classification, clustering and extraction techniques. arXiv Repository (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.02919. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  3. Zhai, Ch., Massung, S.: Text Data Management and Analysis: A Practical Introduction to Information Retrieval and Text Mining. 1st ed. ACM Books (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ameen, A., Khan, K.U.R.: Creation of ontology in education domain. In: The Proceedings of the IEEE Fourth International Conference on Technology for Education, pp. 237–238 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/t4e.2012.50

  5. Boyce, S., Pahl, C.: Developing domain ontologies for course content. J. Educ. Technol. Soc. 10(3), 275–288 (2007). https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11310019.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2019

    Google Scholar 

  6. Katis, E., Kondylakis, H., Agathangelos, G., Vassilakis, K.: Developing an ontology for curriculum and syllabus. In: Gangemi, A., et al. (eds.) ESWC 2018. LNCS, vol. 11155, pp. 55–59. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-98192-5_11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Baeva, D., Atanasova, D.: Ontology based resource for history education. TEM J. 7(4), 782–786 (2018). https://doi.org/10.18421/tem74-13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rehman, Z., Kifor, S.: Teaching natural language processing (NLP) using ontology based education design. In: Balkan Region Conference on Engineering and Business Education vol. 1, no. 1. De Gruyter Open (2015). Open-Access Journal. https://doi.org/10.1515/cplbu-2015-0024

  9. Alfaries, A.A., Aljably, R.H., Al-Razgan, M.S.: Modeling the NLP research domain using ontologies: an ontology representation of NLP concepts from a research perspective. In: The Proceedings of the Future Technologies Conference (FTC), pp. 1064–1072 (2018). https://saiconference.com/Downloads/FTC2017/Proceedings/152_Paper_164-Modeling_the_NLP_Research_Domain.pdf. Accessed 11 Mar 2019

  10. NLTK 3.4 documentation. https://www.nltk.org/. Accessed 12 Mar 2019

  11. Python Software Foundation. https://www.python.org/. Accessed 10 Feb 2019

  12. Novak, J.: Concept maps and Vee diagrams: two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Instr. Sci. 19, 29–52 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. W3C. OWL 2 Web Ontology Language: Document Overview, 2nd edn., W3C Recommendation, 11 December 2012. https://www.w3.org/TR/2012/REC-owl2-overview-20121211/. Accessed 1 Feb 2019

  14. W3C: RDF 1.1 Concepts and Abstract Syntax, W3C Recommendation, 25 February 2014. https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf11-concepts-20140225/. Accessed 2 Feb 2019

  15. W3C: RDF Schema 1.1, W3C Recommendation, 25 February 2014. https://www.w3.org/TR/2014/REC-rdf-schema-20140225/. Accessed 2 Feb 2019

  16. Bird, S., Klein, E., Loper, E.: Natural Language Processing with Python: Analyzing Text with the Natural Language Toolkit, 1st edn. O’Reilly Media, Sebastopol (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research. https://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed 5 Mar 2019

  18. O’Connor, M., Das, A.: SQWRL: a query language for OWL. In: The Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on OWL: Experiences and Directions, vol. 529, pp. 208–215 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  19. W3C. SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004. https://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/. Accessed 4 Mar 2019

  20. Harris, S., Garlik, a part of Experian Andy Seaborne, The Apache Software Foundation (eds.) W3C. SPARQL 1.1 Query Language. https://www.w3.org/TR/2013/REC-sparql11-query-20130321/. Accessed 5 Mar 2019

  21. W3C. RDF 1.1 Turtle: Terse RDF Triple Language, W3C Recommendation, 2 February 2014. https://www.w3.org/TR/turtle/. Accessed 5 Mar 2019

  22. Lamy, J.B.: Owlready: ontology-oriented programming in Python with automatic classification and high level constructs for biomedical ontologies. Artif. Intell. Med. 80, 11–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ronacher, A.: Flask homepage. http://flask.pocoo.org/. Accessed 4 Mar 2019

  24. Androutsopoulos, I., Lampouras, G., Galanis, D.: Generating natural language descriptions from OWL ontologies: the NaturalOWL system. J. Artif. Intell. Res. 48, 671–715 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amith, M., et al.: Expressing biomedical ontologies in natural language for expert evaluation. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 245, 838–842 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Hagberg, A.A., Schult, D.A., Swart, P.J.: Exploring network structure, dynamics, and function using NetworkX. In: Varoquaux, G., Vaught, T., Millman, J. (eds.) The Proceedings of the 7th Python in Science Conference (SciPy 2008), Pasadena, CA, USA, pp. 11–15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support of the Specific research project at FIM UHK is gratefully acknowledged. The author would like to thank Tomáš Nacházel for figures preparation and Luboš Mercl for administration.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martina Husáková .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Husáková, M. (2019). Ontology-Based Conceptualisation of Text Mining Practice Areas for Education. In: Nguyen, N., Chbeir, R., Exposito, E., Aniorté, P., Trawiński, B. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. ICCCI 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28374-2_46

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28374-2_46

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-28373-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-28374-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics