Abstract
Different social environments have been used, in recent times, as contexts for interaction by social robotics such as children in hospitals or classrooms with positive results. Recently, the MOnarCH project explored the formation of social relations between a robot and users, namely children, in the Pediatrics ward of an Oncological hospital. This robot can navigate autonomously in the available free space, interacting with basic verbal and non-verbal utterances, explicitly when someone is recognized or touches it. The chapter shows the design process of MOnarCH which is carried out in three phases: Conceptual, Production, and Deployment and Evaluation. The main intention is to understand how the system can be designed to best suit the people and the society who need to use it and include the necessary flexibility for a posteriori behavioral adjustment. Annotated video recordings and micro-behaviors that were used in some of the experiments asserts that MOnarCH is simply a playmate for a physically and emotionally fragile population, a new experience that does not replace healthcare professionals. The empirical evidence suggests that the vast majority of children surveyed had the correct perception that the robot was not alive. Nevertheless, children acknowledged the robot’s presence in the Pediatrics ward and the liveliness features implemented positively.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aibo (2017) Aibos History | Sony Aibo [Internet]. http://www.sony-aibo.com/aibos-history/. Online April 2017
Bernabei V, De Ronchi D, La Ferla T, Moretti F, Tonelli L, Ferrari B et al (2013) Animal-assisted interventions for elderly patients affected by dementia or psychiatric disorders: a review. J Psychiatr Res 47(6):762–773
Chang WL, Šabanović S, Huber L (2013) Use of seal-like robot PARO in sensory group therapy for older adults with dementia. In: Proceedings of 8th ACM/IEEE international conference on human-robot interaction (HRI). IEEE, Tokyo, pp 101–102
Dautenhahn K (2003) Roles and functions of robots in human society—implications from research in autism therapy. Robotica 21(4):443–452
Dautenhahn K, Werry I (2004) Towards interactive robots in autism therapy: background, motivation and challenges. Pragmat Cogn 12(1):1–35
Delvaux M (2016) Draft report 2015/2103(INL) with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics. European Parliament, 31 May
European Commission (EU) (2017a) Ethics review in FP7: guidance for applicants: informed consent. European Commission—Research Directorate-General Directorate L—Science, Economy and Society Unit L3—Governance and Ethics. http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/data/%20ref/fp7/89807/%20informed-consent_en.pdf. Online April 2017
European Commision (EU) (2017b) Civil Law Rules on Robotics. P8_TA-PROV(2017)0051, European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2013 (INL))
Ferreira MIA, Sequeira JS (2015) Assessing human-robot interaction: the role of long-run experiments. In: Proceedings of the 18th international conference on climbing and walking robots and support technologies for mobile machines (CLAWAR 2015). Hangzhou, China, 6–9 September 2015
Friedman B, Kahn Jr PH, Hagman J (2003) Hardware companions?: What online AIBO discussion forums reveal about the human-robotic relationship. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 273–280. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/642611.642660
Giacomin G (2012) What is human centred design? Procs. 10º Congresso Brasileiro de Pesquisa e Desenvolvimento em Design. São Luis, Maranho, Brasil
Giusti L, Marti P (2006) Interpretative dynamics in human robot interaction. In: The 15th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 2006 ROMAN 2006, pp 111–116
Hasbro (2017) Joy for all companion pets. https://joyforall.hasbro.com/en-us/companion-cats. Online March 2017
Holthaus P, Pitsch K, Wachsmuth S (2011) How can I help? International journal social robotics, September 2011
ISO9241-210 (2010) https://www.iso.org/standard/52075.html. Online December 2017
Kanda T, Nishio S, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2009) Interactive humanoid robots and androids in children’s lives. Child Youth Environ 19(1):12–33. www.colorado.edu/journals/cye
Kawaguchi Y, Wada K, Okamoto M, Tsujii T, Shibata T, Sakatani K (2012) Investigation of brain activity after interaction with seal robot measured by fNIRS. Proceedings of IEEE RO-MAN, pp 571–576
Liu C, Conn K, Sarkar N, Stone W (2008) Online affect detection and robot behaviour adaptation for intervention of children with autism. IEEE Trans Robot 24(4):883–896
MacDorman KF, Vasudevan SK, Ho C-C (2008) Does Japan really have robot mania? Comparing attitudes by implicit and explicit measures (PDF). AI Soc 23(4):485–510, 883–896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-008-0181-2
Marti P, Palma V, Pollini A, Rullo A, Shibata T (2013) My Gym Robot. Procs symp on robot companions: hard problems and open challenges in robot–human interaction, pp 64–73, 2005
Martín F, Agüero C, Cañas JM, Abella G, Benítez R, Rivero S, Valenti M, Martínez-Martín P (2013) Robots in therapy for dementia patients. J Phys Agents 7(1):49–56, January 2013
Mori M (2012) The uncanny valley. IEEE Robot Autom 19 (2): 98–100 (trans: MacDorman KF, Kageki N)
Moyle W, Jones C, Cooke M, O’Dwyer S, Sung B, Drummond S (2013) Social robots helping people with dementia: assessing efficacy of social robots in the nursing home environment. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on human system interaction (HSI), pp 608–613
NAO (2017) NAO robot at Chelsea Westminster hospital, UK. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhEsXBV7dFI. Online April 2017
NAOb (2017) Robot receptionist gets job at Belgian hospital. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GuXRyUiew88. Online April 2017
Norman D, Draper S (1986) User-centered system: new perspectives on human-computer interaction. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
Šabanović S, Bennett CC, Chang W-L, Huber L (2013) PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia. In: IEEE International conference on rehabilitation robotics 2013, June 2013
Sequeira J, Ferreira I (2014) The concept of [robot] in children and teens: guidelines to the design of social robots. Int J Signs Semiot Syst (IJSSS) 3(2):43–57
Sequeira J, Gameiro D (2017) A probabilistic approach to RFID-based localization for human-robot interaction in social robotics. Electronics 6(2):32, Special Issue on RFID Systems and Applications, April 2017
Sequeira J, Lima P, Ferreira I, Ventura R, Saffiotti A, Pecora F, Gonzalez V, Barbosa M, Estilita J, Alvito P, Breitenmoser A, Martinoli A, Pereira JN, Englebienne G (2015) MOnarCH storyboards: interactive game technical script. http://www.monarch-fp7.eu
Sequeira J (2017) Evaluation of experiments in social robotics: insights from the MOnarCH project. In: Proceedings of 26th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2017, Lisbon, Portugal, August 28–September 1 2017
Shibata T, Mitsui T, Wada K, Touda A, Kumasaka T, Tagami K et al (2001) Mental commit robot and its application to therapy of children. In: Proceedings of 2001 IEEE/ASME international conference on advanced intelligent mechatronics proceedings (Cat No01TH8556), vol 2, pp 1053–1058
Steen M (2012) Human-centered design as a fragile encounter. Des Issues 28(1):72–80
Tanaka F, Cicourel A, Movellan JR (2007) Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center. In: Proceedings of the national academy of science, vol 194, no 46, 17954x17958
Turkle S, Taggart W, Kidd CD, Dasté O (2006a) Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connect Sci 18(4):347–362
Turkle S, Breazeal C, Dasté O, Scassellati B (2006b) First encounters with kismet and cog: children respond to relational artifacts. In: Messaris P, Humphreys L (eds) Digital media: transformations in human communication. Peter Lang Publishing, New York
Ventura R, Ahmad A (2015) RoboCup 2014: robot world cup XVIII, chapter Towards optimal robot navigation in domestic spaces. LNAI 8992. Springer, pp 318–331
Wada K, Takasawa Y, Shibata T (2013) Robot therapy at facilities for the elderly in Kanagawa prefecture—a report on the experimental result of the first week. In: 2013 IEEE RO-MAN, pp 757–61
Weiss A, Igelsbock J, Wurhofer D, Tacheligi M (2011) Looking forward to a “Robotic Society”? Int J Soc Robot 3:111–129
Wu Y-H, Fassert C, Rigaud A-S (2012) Designing robots for the elderly: appearance issue and beyond. Arch Gerontol Geriatr 54(1):121–6, February 201
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sequeira, J.S., Ferreira, M.I.A., Barata, A.N., Pereira, M.F. (2019). A Motivational Case Study in Social Robotics. In: Ayanoğlu, H., Duarte, E. (eds) Emotional Design in Human-Robot Interaction. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96722-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96722-6_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-96721-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-96722-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)