Skip to main content

Selected Trade-Offs and Risks Associated with Land Use Transitions in Central Germany

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Atlas of Ecosystem Services

Abstract

Future uncertainties and risks for socio-environmental systems are often addressed in the form of scenarios. This study aims to identify the biggest future risks and uncertainties for the study region Central Germany and the question which land use changes and impacts on selected ecosystem services related to agricultural production can be expected in the coming decades.

For this purpose, we co-developed scenario storylines along the largest uncertainties, how the region may change with different stakeholders and used environmental models to simulate land-use changes and impacts on selected ecosystem services related to agricultural production.

The study revealed that Climate change may have beneficial (e.g. maize, sugar beet) or adverse effects (e.g. barley, wheat) on crop yield levels, depending on crop type and level of climate change. In the scenarios crop production is additionally influenced by different levels of regional preferences influencing crop land extent (e.g., afforestation), crop management (e.g., organic production), and crop types used for food or bioenergy production. As driving factors such as climate change, land availability, and land management all influence agriculture, integrated studies like this are needed to assess future crop production. However, sustainability objectives may prefer other than the most productive agricultural pathways providing additional benefits such as regulating or cultural services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu J, Dietz T, Carpenter SR, Alberti M, Folke C, Moran E, et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science. 2007;317:1513–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hauck J, Winkler KJ, Priess JA. Reviewing drivers of ecosystem change as input for environmental modelling. Sustain Water Qual Ecol. 2015;5:9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alcamo J, Kok K, Busch G, Priess J. Searching for the future of land: scenarios from the local to global scale. Dev Integr Environ Assess. 2008;2:67–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Priess JA, Hauck J. Integrative Scenario Development. Ecol Soc. 2014;19(1):12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. DESTATIS. GENESIS online database of the federal statistical office of Germany. https://www-genesis.destatis.de/genesis/online. Accessed 13 Oct 2017.

  6. Schweitzer C, Priess JA, Das S. A generic framework for land-use modelling. Environ Model Softw. 2011;26(8):1052–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wochele-Marx S, Lang E, Pomm S, Das S, Priess JA. Central Germany GIS dataset. 2015. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1318765. Accessed Jan 2015.

  8. Niedertscheider M, Kuemmerle T, Müller D, Erb K-H. Exploring the effects of drastic institutional and socio-economic changes on land system dynamics in Germany between 1883 and 2007. Glob Environ Chang. 2014;28:98–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. SMUL - Sächsisches Staatsministerium für Umwelt und Landwirtschaft. Richtlinie Agrarumweltmaßnahmen und Waldmehrung. 2007. http://www.smul.sachsen.de/foerderung/94.htm. Accessed Mar 2015.

  10. BMJV - Bundesministerium der Justiz und Verbraucherschutz. Gesetz für den Ausbau erneuerbarer Energien (Erneuerbare-Energien-Gesetz – EEG 2014). 2014. Berlin. www.bmjv.de. Accessed Dec 2014.

  11. European Commission. Renewable Energy Directive 2009/28/EC. 2009. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A32009L0028. Accessed Mar 2015.

  12. Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D, Ruane AC, Müller C, Arneth A, et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(9):3268–73.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Trnka M, Olesen JE, Kersebaum KC, Skjelvåg AO, Eitzinger J, Seguin B, et al. Agroclimatic conditions in Europe under climate change. Glob Chang Biol. 2011;17(7):2298–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Seppelt R, Manceur AM, Liu J, Fenichel EP, Klotz S. Synchronized peak-rate years of global resources use. Ecol Soc. 2014;19(4):50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper was funded by the Helmholtz research program POF2/3 (CH, EL, GJ, JAP, SP) and by the EU FP7 project OpenNESS (project EC-308428) (CS).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joerg A. Priess .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Priess, J.A., Hoyer, C., Jäckel, G., Lang, E., Pomm, S., Schweitzer, C. (2019). Selected Trade-Offs and Risks Associated with Land Use Transitions in Central Germany. In: Schröter, M., Bonn, A., Klotz, S., Seppelt, R., Baessler, C. (eds) Atlas of Ecosystem Services. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-96229-0_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics