Skip to main content

Ethical Aspects of Individualised Care

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Individualized Care

Abstract

The ethical underpinning of ‘individualised care’ seems obviously related to the value of autonomy. What is less clear is how individualised care compares with other models of care such as person-centred care and evidence-based care. Models of care with an ethical underpinning need also to integrate evidence to improve health-care outcomes. The facts must, therefore, inform the values and vice versa. What is too rarely considered is which values, in addition to autonomy, underpin individualised care so this is expanded to provide a sufficient model of care across contexts and cultures. Does individualised care, for example, have relevance to public health? Drawing on two practice scenarios relating to care in clinical and public health settings, we argue that individualised care is most helpfully contextualised within a model of ‘integrative care’ informed by an ‘integrative ethics’. We develop a three-level model—individual, family and community—with scope to apply key ethical values. The approach we propose goes beyond a traditional autonomy-based model of individualised care towards an integrative bioethics with capacity to integrate the activities of advocacy, empowerment and activism.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sodeke SO. Tuskegee University experience challenges conventional wisdom: is integrative bioethics practice the new ethics for the public’s health? J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2012;23(4 Suppl):15–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Department of Health. Personalised care planning: information sheet 1. 2011. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/215946/dh_124048.pdf. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

  3. My Home Life. Relationship-centred care. 2017. http://myhomelife.org.uk/good-practice/relationship-centred-care/. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  4. Oregan Health Authority (undated) Patient Centered Services (PCS). See https://www.oregan.gov/OHA/PH/HEALTHYPEOPLEFAMILIES/WIC/Pages/orwl/aspx.

  5. Australian Government. What is consumer directed care? Information for home care package providers. Department of Social Services. https://www.myagedcare.gov.au/. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  6. Royal College of Nursing. What person-centred care means: first steps for health care assistants. http://rcnhca.org.uk/sample-page/what-person-centred-care-means/. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  7. Hutchison JS. Scandals in health-care: their impact on health policy and nursing. Nurs Inq. 2015;23(1):32–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Katz RV, Warren RC. The search for the legacy of the USPHS syphilis study at Tuskegee. Lanham: Lexington; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frauman AC, Skelly AH. Evolution of the nursing process. Clin Excell Nurse Pract. 1999;3(4):238–44.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Greenhalgh T. How to implement evidence-based healthcare. Wiley. 2017. http://www.wiley.com/WileyCDA/WileyTitle/productCd-1119238528.html. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  11. Suhonen R, Valimaki M, Katajisto J, et al. Provision of individualized care improves hospital patient outcomes: an explanatory model using LISREL. Int J Nurs Stud. 2007;44(2):197–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Health Foundation. Person-centred care made simple. 2014. http://www.health.org.uk/sites/health/files/PersonCentredCareMadeSimple.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  13. Heerema E. Thomas Kitwood’s person-centred care for dementia. 2017. https://www.verywell.com/what-is-person-centered-care-in-dementia-97737. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  14. Anderson D. What is a person? Consortium on Cognitive Science Instruction. 2000. http://www.mind.ilstu.edu/curriculum/what_is_a_person/what_is_a_person.php. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

  15. Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  16. The Belmont report. The National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioural Research. 1979. https://videocast.nih.gov/pdf/ohrp_appendix_belmont_report_vol_2.pdf. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  17. Mackenzie C, Stoljar N. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tronto JC. Moral boundaries: a political argument for an ethic of care. New York: Routledge; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gallagher A. Care ethics and nursing practice. In: Scott A, editor. Key concepts and issues in nursing ethics. Cham: Springer; 2017. p. 55–68.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Martinsen EH. Caring in medicine: from a gentleman’s care to ‘a more sophisticated sense of human independence’. In: Olthuis G, Kohlen H, Keier J, editors. Moral boundaries redrawn: the significance of Joan Tronto’s argument for political theory, professional ethics and care as practice. Leuven: Peeters; 2014. p. 113–32.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Public health: ethical issues. 2007. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/public-health. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  22. Boseley S. Global cost of obesity-related illness to hit $1.2tn a year from 2015. The Guardian newspaper. 2017. https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/oct/10/treating-obesity-related-illness-will-cost-12tn-a-year-from-2025-experts-warn. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  23. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Adult Obesity Facts, 2017. See https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html.

  24. Wikler D. Who should be blamed for being sick? In: Bayer R, Gostin LO, Jennings B, et al., editors. Public health ethics: theory, policy and practice. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. Solidarity: reflections on an emerging concept in bioethics. 2007. http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/solidarity. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  26. Collins PH. Black feminist thought: knowledge, consciousness and the politics of empowerment. New York: Routledge; 1991.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman M. Autonomy, social disruption and women. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 35–51.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Arbeit M. What are we ready to risk? Academia, advocacy, and activism. 2015. http://sexedtransforms.blogspot.com/2015/05/what-are-we-ready-to-risk-academia.html. Accessed 25 Feb 2018.

  29. Banks SJ, Gallagher A. Ethics in professional life: virtues for health and social care. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2009.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  30. Murdoch I. The sovereignty of good. Abingdon: Routledge; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  31. United Nations. Sustainable development goals. 2016. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs. Accessed 28 Mar 2018.

  32. Warren RC. Towards new models. Section introduction. In: De La Cancela V, Lau Chin J, Jenkins YM, editors. Community health psychology, empowerment for diverse communities. New York: Routledge; 1998. p. 219.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Warren RC. The social context of faith and health. In: Warren RC, HCJ L, Zulfiqar AA, editors. The health behavioural change imperative: theoretical, educational and practice dimensions. New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Bayer R, Beauchamp DE. Public health ethics: new ethics for the public’s health. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ann Gallagher .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gallagher, A., Warren, R.C. (2019). Ethical Aspects of Individualised Care. In: Suhonen, R., Stolt, M., Papastavrou, E. (eds) Individualized Care. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89899-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89899-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89898-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89899-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics