Skip to main content

Political Challenges: Expectations and Changes 2011–2014

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Arab Uprisings in Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia

Abstract

This chapter compares and combines key background information from political history and non-survey data with people’s perceptions as captured in surveys, to explore trends in people’s perceptions and political preferences before and after the Uprisings. This data suggest that people across all three countries are committed both to the idea of democracy and to its parliamentary institutional form, but that they have a more expansive understanding of democracy which includes social and economic rights. Furthermore, people’s attitudes on the relationship between religion and politics shows that while most identify as religious and do wish to see a stronger relationship between religion and legislation, substantial majorities do not trust religious leaders and do not want them to influence voting or government decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Ennahda had already stated that it would not call into question the personal status legislation (Allani 2009).

  2. 2.

    In this chapter we draw on four surveys: the Arab Barometer II carried out in Jordan in December 2010, Egypt June 2011 and Tunisia October 2011; Arab Barometer III Jordan December 2010/January 2013, Egypt April 2013, Tunisia February 2013; Arab Transformations Survey carried out in Jordan, June 2014, Egypt November 2014 and Tunisia August 2014; and the World Values Survey carried out in Egypt and Jordan in 2013 and Tunisia in 2014. Unless otherwise indicated, references to 2011 public opinions are based on Arab Barometer II, to 2013 Arab Barometer III and to 2014 the Arab Transformations Survey.

  3. 3.

    It should be noted that Egyptian respondents answering, ‘don’t know’ (DK) increased from 9% in 2011 to 34% in 2014 (in Jordan they were 8.5% and 2.2%, in Tunisia 21.1% and 11.4%). Because analysis looks to identify respondents giving a definitive answer, DKs should be understood as not agreeing. It is possible that an increase in DKs could be connected to the political turmoil of the post-2013 period, in which the Brotherhood used pro-democratic arguments to reject the Army’s coup against then-President Morsi.

References

Sources of Data

Other References

  • Al Jazeera. (2016, January 24). Is Another Revolution Brewing in Egypt? Five Years After the Arab Spring, Analysts Say the Conditions Are in Place for Another Uprising in Egypt. Retrieved from http://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/01/160122114637805.html

  • Allani, A. (2009). The Islamists in Tunisia Between Confrontation and Participation: 1980–2008. Journal of North African Studies, 14(2), 257–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahl, R. (1989). Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller, G. E. (2003). The Future of Political Islam. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gause, I. I. I. G. F. (2011). Why Middle East Studies Missed the Arab Spring: The Myth of Authoritarian Stability. Foreign Affairs, 90(4), 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, D. (2012). Tunisia After the Uprising: Islamist and Secular Quests for Women’s Rights. Mediterranean Politics, 17(3), 285–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamid, S. (2016). Islamic Exceptionalism: How the Struggle Over Islam is Reshaping the World. New York: St Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinnebusch, R. (2006). Authoritarian Persistence, Democratization Theory and the Middle East: An Overview and Critique. Democratization, 13(3), 373–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. M. & Walters, M. R. (2014). Explaining the Unexpected: Political Science and the Surprises of 1989 and 2011. Perspectives on Politics, 12(2), 394–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The Clash of Civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart, R. (2017). Changing Values in the Islamic World and the West. In M. Moaddel & M. Gelfand (Eds.), Values and Political Action in the Middle East. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamal, A., & Tessler, M. (2008). Attitudes in the Arab World. Journal of Democracy, 19(1), 97–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, M. (2016). From Contention to Reform: Deep Democratization and the Rule of Law. In E. Bellin & H. E. Lane (Eds.), Building Rule of Law in the Arab World: Tunisia, Egypt, and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judt, T. (2011). Ill Fares the Land. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, A. (2016, March 24). Iraq and Syria: How Many Foreign Fighters are Fighting for Isil?’ The Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/03/29/iraq-and-syria-how-many-foreign-fighters-are-fighting-for-isil/.

  • Lust, E. (2013). The Middle East. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merone, F. (2015). Enduring Class Struggle in Tunisia: The Fight for Identity Beyond Political Islam. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies, 42(1), 74–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Packer, G. (2016, March). Exporting Jihad. The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2016/03/28/tunisia-and-the-fall-after-the-arab-spring

  • Rhoden, T. (2015). The Liberal in Liberal Democracy. Democratization, 22(3), 560–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robins, M. (2015). After the Arab Spring People Still Want Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 26(4), 80–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, C. (2012). The Implications of Jordan’s New Electoral Law. Foreign Policy: The Middle East Channel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stepan, A., & Robertson, G. B. (2003). An ‘Arab’ More Than ‘Muslim’ Electoral Gap. Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 30–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M., Jamal, A., & Robbins, M. (2012). New Findings on Arabs and Democracy. Journal of Democracy, 23(4), 89–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessler, M., & Robbins, M. (2014). Political Systems Preferences of Arab Publics. In M. Lynch (Ed.), The Arab Uprisings Explained. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teti, A., & Gervasio, G. (2011). The Unbearable Lightness of Authoritarianism: Lessons from the Arab Uprisings. Mediterranean Politics, 16(2), 321–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welzel, C., & Klingeman, H.-D. (2007). Understanding Democratic Congruence: A Demand-Supply Perspective. CSD Working Papers. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/3nb7x3qs.

  • Youngs, R. (2015). The Puzzle of Non-Western Democracy. New York: Brookings Institutional Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Teti, A., Abbott, P., Cavatorta, F. (2018). Political Challenges: Expectations and Changes 2011–2014. In: The Arab Uprisings in Egypt, Jordan and Tunisia. Reform and Transition in the Mediterranean. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69044-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics