Skip to main content

Abstract

Appropriateness is a key concept in the evolving landscape of healthcare, especially with the change from fee-for-service reimbursement to value-based purchasing and reimbursement. Consequently, healthcare providers, leaders, and change agents must be comfortable with defining appropriate care, and then designing systems to both ensure patients receive appropriate care and to prevent the delivery of inappropriate care. This chapter discusses the problem of unexplained variation in clinical care delivery, associated health outcomes, and the high cost of healthcare delivery. Next, the chapter describes the various conceptualizations of appropriateness from the perspective of four key stakeholders: physicians, patients, payers, and researchers. These conceptualizations serve as a framework to illustrate how the various stakeholders define appropriateness of care, and how these different stakeholders develop and use appropriateness criteria to shape care delivery. Lastly, the chapter proposes a three-step process by which healthcare leaders can improve care by using appropriateness criteria, and uses examples from a hospital, a health system, and a state collaborative to illustrate this three-step process in action.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Healthcare Expenditures 2014 highlights. https://www.cms.gov/Research-Statistics-Data-and-Systems/Statistics-Trends-and-Reports/NationalHealthExpendData/Downloads/highlights.pdf. Accessed 23 April 2016.

  2. Squires D, Anderson C. U.S. Health Care from a global perspective: spending, use of services, prices, and health in 13 countries. The Commonwealth Fund. 2015. Available at http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/issue-briefs/2015/oct/us-health-care-from-a-global-perspective. Accessed 23 April 2016.

  3. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb MS, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending part 1: the content, quality and accessibility of care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:273–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fisher ES, Wennberg DE, Stukel TA, Gottlieb MS, Lucas FL, Pinder EL. The implications of regional variations in Medicare spending part 2: health outcomes and satisfaction with care. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138:288–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gawande A. The cost conundrum. The New Yorker, 1 June 2009. Available at http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2009/06/01/the-cost-conundrum. Accessed 19 May 2016.

  6. Gawande A. Overkill. The New Yorker, 4 May 2015. Available at http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/annals-of-health-care. Accessed 19 May 2016.

  7. McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, Keesey JK, Hicks J, DeCristofaro A, Kerr EA. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawson EH, Gibbons MM, Ingraham AM, Shekelle PG, Ko CY. Appropriateness criteria to assess variations in surgical procedure use in the United States. Arch Surg. 2011;146(12):1433–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Brook R, Chassin M, Fink A, Solomon D, Kosecoff J, Park R. A method for the detailed assessment of the appropriateness of medical technologies. RAND Corporation. 1991. Available at http://www.rand.org/pubs/notes/N3376.html. Accessed 19 May 2016.

  10. Shekelle PG. The appropriateness method. Med Decis Making. 2004;24:228–31. doi:10.1177/0272989X04264212.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fenton JJ, Jerant AF, Bertakis KD, Franks P. The cost of satisfaction: a national study of patient satisfaction, health care utilization, expenditures, and mortality. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172(5):405–11. doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1662.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chou R, Qaseem A, Snow V, Casey D, Cross Jr JT, Shekelle PG, Owens DK. Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain: a joint clinical practice guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain Society. Ann Intern Med. 2008;147(7):478–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cigna. http://www.cigna.com/healthcare-professionals/resources-for-health-care-professionals/clinical-payment-and-reimbursement-policies/medical-necessity-definitions.

  15. Lavis JN, Anderson GM. Appropriateness in health care delivery: definitions, measurement and policy implications. Can Med Assoc J. 1996;154(3):321–8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Quality Payment Program. Available at https://www.cms.gov/Medicare/Quality-Initiatives-Patient-Assessment-Instruments/Value-Based-Programs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs/MACRA-MIPS-and-APMs.html. Accessed 19 May 2016.

  17. Gertman PM, Restuccia JD. The appropriateness evaluation protocol: a technique for assessing unnecessary days of hospital care. Med Care. 1981;19:855–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McDonagh MS, Smith DH, Goddard M. Measuring appropriate use of acute beds: a systematic review of methods and results. Health Policy. 2000;53:157–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Milliman care guidelines. Available at https://www.mcg.com/content/about-mcg. Accessed 23 April 2016.

  20. Mitus AJ. Birth of InterQual. Prof Case Manag. 2008;13(4):228–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Slee VN. Report of the conference on hospital discharge abstracts systems. Med Care. 1970;8(4 Supplement: Hospital Discharge Data):34–40.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Luft HS. The professional activity study of the Commission on Hospital and Professional Activities: a user’s perspective. Health Serv Res. 1983;18(2):349–52.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Boucher A, Bowman S, Piselli C, Scichilone C (2010) The evolution of DRGs. J AHIMA web exclusive. Available at http://bok.ahima.org/doc?oid=106590#.Vz3ODjUrLRY. Accessed 23 April 2016.

  24. National Healthcare Expense Tables. Available at https://www.cms.gov/research-statistics-data-and-systems/statistics-trends-and-reports/nationalhealthexpenddata/nhe-fact-sheet.html. Accessed 23 April 2016.

  25. Burwell SA. Setting value-based payment goals—HHS efforts to improve U.S. Health Care. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:897–9. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1500445.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Coffey CE, Goodman RJ, Chang KM, Griner T, Dailey F, Nuckols TS. Implementing guideline-based indications for cardiac monitoring at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Abstract presented at the 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine Annual Meeting, San Diego, CA, 6–9 March 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  27. James B, Savitz LA. How intermountain trimmed health care costs through robust quality improvement efforts. Health Aff. 2011;30(6):1185–91. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Haitao C, Cosgrove S, Sexton B, Hyzy R, Welsh R, Roth G, Bander J, Kepros J, Goeschel C. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:2725–32. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa061115.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charles E. Coffey Jr. M.D., M.S., F.H.M., F.A.C.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Coffey, C.E., Nuckols, T.K. (2017). Assuring Appropriate Care. In: Sax, H. (eds) Measurement and Analysis in Transforming Healthcare Delivery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46222-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46222-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-46220-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-46222-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics