Abstract
Features of the Web-based Inquiry Science Environment (WISE) such as interactive dynamic visualizations, science inquiry, and online critiquing address educational reform efforts. However, how such reform-based learning environment developed in the US addresses the needs of teachers and students in Taiwan requires investigations. In this chapter, we reviewed research on the customizations and implementations of WISE units in Taiwan to discuss issues including: teacher adaptation from teacher-centered to inquiry-based instruction, the impact of the WISE units on students’ learning of science, different instructional approaches to the use of the WISE units and their effects, and the relationship between students’ experiences of learning with WISE units and their ability to formulate scientific explanations. We reflected on the issue of the role of the WISE units as replacement for or as supplementary to the conventional textbook instruction. We also discussed the remaining issues for future research.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barab, S. A., & Luehmann, A. L. (2003). Building sustainable science curriculum: Acknowledging and accommodating local adaptation. Science Education, 87(4), 454–467.
Blumenfeld, P., Fishman, B., Krajcik, J., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (2000). Creating usable innovations in systemic reform: Scaling-up technology-embedded project-based science in urban schools. Educational Psychologist, 35(3), 149–164.
Chang, H.-Y. (2013). Teacher guidance to mediate student inquiry through interactive dynamic visualizations. Instructional Science, 41(5), 895–920.
Chang, S.-Y., & Chang, H.-Y. (2011). The implementation and effects of dynamic visual exploration curriculum integrated with the chemical reaction unit of eighth-grade students. Paper presented at the 27th Association in Science Education Annual Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Chang, H.-Y., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Scaffolding learning from molecular visualizations. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 50(7), 858–886.
Chang, H.-Y., Zhang, Z. H., & Chang, S.-Y. (2013). Adaptation of an inquiry visualization curriculum and its impact on chemistry learning. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher,. doi:10.1007/s40299-013-0133-6.
Clark, D. B., & Sampson, V. D. (2007). Personally-seeded discussions to scaffold online argumentation. International Journal of Science Education, 29(3), 253–277.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Davis, E. A. (2004). Knowledge integration in science teaching: Analyzing teachers’ knowledge development. Research in Science Education, 34(1), 21–53.
Davis, E. A., & Krajcik, J. S. (2005). Designing educative curriculum materials to promote teacher learning. Educational Researcher, 34(3), 3–14.
Frailich, M., Kesner, M., & Hofstein, A. (2009). Enhancing students’ understanding of the concept of chemical bonding by using activities provided on an interactive website. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46, 289–310.
Hsu, Y.-S., Chang, H.-Y., Fang, S.-C., & Wu, H.-K. (2014). Developing technology-infused inquiry learning environment to promote science learning in Taiwan. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Science education in East Asia: Pedagogical innovations and best practices (Under Review).
Hung, J.-Y., Huang, C.-R., & Chang, H.-Y. (2012). Enactment of a dynamic visualization curriculum to enhance high school students’ understanding of cell division. Journal of Liberal Arts and Social Sciences, 8(1), 71–96.
Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2008). Educational research: Quantitative, qualitative, and mixed approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Krajcik, J. S. (1991). Developing students’ understanding of chemical concepts. In S. M. Glynn, R. H. Yeany, & B. K. Britton (Eds.), The psychology of learning science (pp. 117–147). Hillsdale, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Lee, H.-S., Linn, M. C., Varma, K., & Liu, O. L. (2010). How do technology-enhanced inquiry science units impact classroom learning? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(1), 71–90.
Lin, J.-H., Zeng, X.-F., & Chang, H.-Y. (2011). The relationship between participating digital exploration curriculum and the abilities of forming scientific explanations in eighth-grade students. Paper presented at the 27th Association in Science Education Annual Conference, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Linn, M. C. (2006). The knowledge integration perspective on learning and instruction. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 243–264). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Linn, M. C., Chang, H.-Y., Chiu, J. L., Zhang, Z., & McElhaney, K. (2011). Can desirable difficulties overcome deceptive clarity in scientific visualizations? In A. S. Benjamin (Ed.), Successful remembering and successful forgetting: A festschrift in honor of Robert A. Bjork (pp. 235–258). New York: Psychology Press.
Linn, M. C., Davis, E. A., & Bell, P. (2004). Internet environments for science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2006). Science education: Integrating views of learning and instruction. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed., pp. 511–544). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Linn, M. C., & Eylon, B. S. (2011). Science learning and instruction: Taking advantage of technology to promote knowledge integration. New York: Routledge.
Linn, M. C., Lee, H.-S., Tinker, R., Husic, F., & Chiu, J. L. (2006). Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science, 313, 1049–1050.
Marx, R. W., Blumenfeld, P. C., Krajcik, J. S., & Soloway, E. (1997). Enacting project-based science. The Elementary School Journal, 97(4), 341–358.
Ministry of Education, Taiwan. (2008). The outline for the nine-year integrated curriculum. Taipei, Taiwan: Ministry of Education, Taiwan.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.
National Research Council. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C.: National Academy.
National Research Council. (2011). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development. (2013). PISA 2012 results in focus: What 15-year-olds know and what they can do with what they know. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-overview.pdf.
Polman, J. L., & Pea, R. D. (2001). Transformative communication as a cultural tool for guiding inquiry science. Science Education, 85(3), 223–238.
Ryoo, K. L., & Linn, M. C. (2012). Can dynamic visualizations improve middle school students’ understanding of energy in photosynthesis? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49, 218–243.
Slotta, J. D., & Linn, M. C. (2009). WISE science: Web-based inquiry in the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.
Tasker, R., & Dalton, R. (2008). Visualizing the molecular world—Design, evaluation, and use of animations. In J. K. Gilbert, M. Reiner, & M. Nakhleh (Eds.), Visualization: Theory and practice in science education (pp. 103–131). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Tsai, K.-C., & Chang, H.-Y. (2011). Combining hands-on and virtual experiments to promote eighth-grade students’ knowledge integration, experimental ability and learning strategies. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 19(5), 435–459.
White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probling understanding. London: Falmer Press.
Xie, Q., & Tinker, R. (2006). Molecular dynamics simulations of chemical reactions for use in education. Journal of Chemical Education, 83(1), 77–83.
Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2011). Can generating representations enhance learning with dynamic visualizations? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48, 1177–1198.
Zhang, Z. H., & Linn, M. C. (2013). Learning from chemical visualizations: Comparing generation and selection. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2174–2197.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chang, HY., Hsu, YS., Hung, JY. (2016). Adapting and Customizing Web-based Inquiry Science Environments to Promote Taiwanese Students’ Learning of Science. In: Chiu, MH. (eds) Science Education Research and Practice in Asia. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0847-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0845-0
Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0847-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)