Abstract
In Hungary today 40 % of the population lives below the poverty line, many of them experiencing social exclusion. One million inhabitants, live in extreme poverty. Children, people living in disadvantaged regions in small settlements and those with special needs are particularly at risk of poverty. In 2013 27 % of children in the EU lived in poverty, while in Hungary the rate was 39.6 %. Regional differences in the poverty rates both in the EU and in Hungary strongly affect the accessibility and availability of local services, their quality, the number of children receiving the services and the reasons for referring children to the public care system. Roma and disabled children are at greater risk of poverty, exclusion, and placement into public care. Despite a clear legal prohibition, over 30 % of the children in out-of-home placements were removed from the family due to poverty and the lack or limitations of local services, including lack of accountability for the decisions made and their consequences. The public care system itself also suffers from insufficient resourcing, and growing demands due to the complex problems of children and their families, and lack of a proper national strategy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
“Alternative care” is used e.g. by the UN Guidelines for Children in Alternative Care, and in many countries for children placed out of home care, out of their family, into public care.
- 2.
9,937,628 according to the census data of the Hungarian Central Statistical Office (2011).
- 3.
‘Alternatives to Custody for Young Offenders – Developing Intensive and Remand Fostering Programmes’ Project reference: JUST/2011-2012/DAP/AG/3054.
References
Act III. on Social Governance and Social Benefits. (1993). para. 86. (Amended by Act CXCI. of 2011. para. 136. which has been in force since 01.01.2012. http://ec.europa.eu/ewsi/en/resources/detail.cfm?ID_ITEMS=9839
Act XXXI. on the Protection of Children and the Administration of Guardianship Affairs. (1997). para. 78 (2) and 79 (4), both amended by Act XXVII. of 2013. para 49. and 51., in force since 01.01.2014. http://net.jogtar.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=99700031.TV
Alternatives to Custody for Young Offenders – Developing Intensive and Remand Fostering Programme. JUST/2011-2012/DAP/AG/3084. http://www.eurochild.org/projects/alternatives-to-custody-for-young-offenders/. Accessed 22 May 2014
Anderson, G. (2001). The motives of foster parents, their family and work characteristics. British Journal of Social Work, 31, 235–248.
Andor, L. (2012). European commissioner for employment, social affairs and inclusion. Speech on “Tackling child poverty”. In 7th European forum on the rights of the child, Brussels, 13 Nov 2012.
Babusik, F. (2009). A nevelőszülői rendszer kutatása. Pilot kutatás [Pilot research on the foster care in Hungary]. Budapest: MTA Gyerekprogram Iroda, Delphoi Consulting. http://www.gyerekesely.hu/index.php?option=com_phocadownload&view=category&id=20%3Agyerekekkel-kapcsolatos-hazai-szakmai-anyagok
Bäckman, O., & Nilsson, A. (2011). Pathways to social exclusion – a life course study. European Sociological Review, 27, 107–123.
Baer, K. (2009). Are poor parents bad parents? http://povertyandpolicy.wordpress.com/2009/11/15/are-poor-parents-bad-parents/ . Accessed 22 May 2014
Balogh, E.S. (2014). The Hungarian government supports school segregation for Roma. http://hungarianspectrum.wordpress.com/2014/03/10/the-hungarian-government-supports-school-segregation-for-roma/. Accessed 22 May 2014.
Bass, L. (Ed.). (2008). Amit tudunk és amit nem… az értelmi fogyatékos emberek helyzetéről Magyarországon [What we know and what we don’t … about the situation of people with mental disability in Hungary]. Budapest: Kézenfogva Foundation.
Blasko, Z. S. (2009). Childcare and employment. Demográfia, 4. http://www.demografia.hu/en/downloads/Demographic_Portrait/2009/04Blasko.pdf
Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. (2010). (2010/C 83/02). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:0389:0403:en:PDF
Clark, C. (2005). The deprofessionalisation thesis, accountability and professional character. Social Work & Society, 3(2), 182–190.
Collins, S. (2008). Statutory social workers; stress, job satisfaction, coping, social support and individual differences. British Journal of Social Work, 38(6), 1173–1193.
Common European Guidelines. (2012). On the transition from institutional to community-based care, guidance on implementing and supporting a sustained transition from institutional care to family-based and community-based alternative care for children, persons with disabilities, persons with mental health problems and older persons in Europe. http://deinstitutionalisationguide.eu/. Accessed 24 May 2014
DG Employment and Social Affairs and Inclusion. (2014). Poverty and social exclusion. http://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=751&langId=en. Accessed 24 May 2014.
Draft of the Government Decree. (2009). On the development of the health visitation service [Korm. Határozat, tervezet A védőnői hálózat fejlesztéséről. Három vagy annál több települést ellátó védőnői körzetek]. http://www.google.hu/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0CDEQFjAB&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.eum.hu%2Fdownload.php%3FdocID%3D3266&ei=NQ1hU9yzNI_gsASY_YCICw&usg=AFQjCNGQknQab0BRwTeX8Zb1V7Buem555w&sig2=JtKiucv_--MATFOC8pZ1sQ&bvm=bv.65636070,d.cWc. Accessed 24 May 2014.
Equal Rights Trust. (2013). Strasbourg court holds that Hungary violated Roma rights to education. http://www.equalrightstrust.org/newsstory190213/index.htm. Accessed 24 May 2014.
ESzCsM Regulation. (2014). no. 49/2004. (V.21.) on the health visitation service. (49/2004. (V. 21.) ESzCsM rendelet a területi védőnői ellátásról). http://www.complex.hu/jr/gen/hjegy_doc.cgi?docid=A0400049.ESC
Europe 2020 targets. Poverty and social\http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/pdf/themes/33_poverty_and_social_inclusion.pdf. Accessed 24 May 2014
European Commission. (2010). Communication from the Commission on Europe 2020 – a strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM (2010) 2020 final. Brussels. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2010:2020:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 20 May 2014
European Commission. (2011a). An EU agenda on the rights of the child, COM(2011) 60 final. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/children/docs/com_2011_60_en.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014
European Commission. (2011b). Early childhood education and care: Providing all our children with the best start for the world of tomorrow, COM 66. Brussels. http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0066:FIN:EN:PDF. Accessed 20 May 2014
European Commission. (2013a). Reducing early school leaving, key messages and policy support, final report of the thematic working group on early school leaving. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/strategic-framework/doc/esl-group-report_en.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014
European Commission. (2013b). http://ec.europa.eu/education/policy/school/early-childhood_en.htm . Accessed 20 May 2014
European Commission. (2013c). Investing in children: Breaking the cycle of disadvantage, commission recommendation, C 778 final. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/files/c_2013_778_en.pdf . Accessed 20 May 2014.
European Commission. (2014). Child-friendly justice. Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/fundamental-rights/rights-child/friendly-justice/index_en.htm. Accessed 20 May 2014.
European Parliament. (2014). Time for action: the stark facts of poverty in Europe. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20130613STO11729/html/Time-for-action-the-stark-facts-of-poverty-in-Europe. Assessed 20 May 2014
European Roma Rights Centre. (2011). Disinterest of the child: Romani children in the Hungarian child protection system. http://www.errc.org/cms/upload/media/02/8F/m0000028F.pdf
Eurostat. (2010). 2008 comparative EU intermediate quality report. Version 2 – June 2010. Luxembourg: Eurostat.
Eurostat, SILC (2013).
Ferge, Z. S., & Darvas, A. (Eds.). (2012). Civil jelentés a Gyerekesélyekről, 2011 [NGO report on the opportunities of the child]. Budapest: Gyerekesély Közhasznú Egyesület. http://www.gyere.net/downloads/Civil_jelentes_2011.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014.
Frazer, H., Marlier, E., Natali, D., Van Dam, R., & Vanhercke, B. (2010). Europe 2020: Towards a more social EU? In E. Marlier, D. Natali, & R. Van Dam (Eds.), Europe 2020. Towards a more social EU? (pp. 15–44). Brussels: P.I.E. Peter Lang.
Gal, A. (2013). Gyermekvédelmi tükör 2013: Diplomás családgondozók tömege a létminimum alatt [Child protection reflection 2013: Highly qualified case workers under the subsistence wage]. Budapest: Módszertani Gyermekjóléti Szolgálatok Országos Egyesülete http://www.mogyesz.hu/files/Gyermekvédelmi%20tükör%202013.pdf. Accessed 20 May 2014.
Giczi, J. (Ed.). (2010). Social outcomes of family policies. Budapest: TARKI. http://workcaresynergies.eu/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/hu/WCS_TARKI_DM2_EN.pdf.
Gyarmati, A., Csák, R., & Rácz, A. (2009). Gyermekvédelmi gondoskodásban élők továbbtanulásának felsőoktatási részvételének vizsgálata az országos statisztikai adatok tükrében. Manuscript of the YIPPEE Research Team [On further education and participation in higher education of children in care]. Budapest: Szociális és Munkaügyi Intézet.
Havas, G., & Zolnay, J. (2011). Sziszifusz számvetése, Roma-dosszié [On segregation of the Roma in the education]. Beszélő, 2011, 16/6. http://beszelo.c3.hu/cikkek/sziszifusz-szamvetese. Accessed 20 May 2014.
Herczog, M. (2008). Bántalmazás miatt a szakellátásba került gyerekek aktáinak vizsgálata (Children referred to public care due to abuse). In R. Hodosán (Ed.), Kapocs Könyvek 17 (pp. 79–111). Budapest: Szociális és Munkaügyi Intézet.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO). (2011). Budapest: KSH. http://www.ksh.hu/nepszamlalas/tables_regional_00?lang=en
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO). (2012a). Családsegítő szolgálatok 2000-2011. [Family supporting services, 2000–2011], p. 5. Budapest: KSH. http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/idoszaki/pdf/csaladsegito.pdf
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO). (2012b). Day care for young children. Statistical Reflection, 2013/58. Budapest: KSH. http://www.ksh.hu/docs/hun/xftp/stattukor/kisgyermnapkozbeni/kisgyermnapkozbeni12.pdf
Hungarian Central Statistical Office (HCSO). (2013a). Yearbook of welfare statistics. Budapest: KSH.
Hungarian Central Statistical Office – (HCSO). (2013b). Létminimum 2012 Statisztikai tükör 2013/53 [Subsistance wage 2012, Statistical Reflection 2013/53]. Budapest: KSH.
Jessen, T. (2010). Job satisfaction and social rewards in the social services. Journal of Comparative Social Work, 2010/1. http://jcsw.no/local/media/jcsw/docs/jcsw_issue_2010_1_3_article.pdf
Kemeny, I., Janky, B. and Lengyel, G. (2004). A magyarországi cigányság, 1971–2003. [The Hungarian Roma, 1971–2003]. Budapest: Gondolat Kiadó
Kertesi, G., & Kezdi, G. (2014). The kindergarten attendance allowance in Hungary, evaluation of a conditional cash transfer program. Acta Oeconomica, 64(1), 27–49. doi:10.1556/AOecon.64.2014.1.2.
Kornai, J. (1997). Editorial: Reforming the welfare state in post-socialist societies. World Development, 25(8), 1183–1186.
Mandell, D., & Frensch, K. (2007). Child welfare workers who are exhausted yet satisfied with their jobs: How do they do it? Child and Family Social Work, 12, 182–191.
Ministry of Public Administration and Justice. (2011). National social inclusion strategy, deep poverty, child poverty, Roma people, 2011–2020. http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/files/roma_hungary_strategy_en.pdf
Open Society Foundations and Decade of Roma Inclusion. (2013). 2005–2015. Civil society monitoring report on the implementation of the National Roma Integration Strategy and Decade Action Plan in 2012 in Hungary. Budapest. http://www.romadecade.org/cms/upload/file/9270_file8_hu_civil-society-monitoring-report_en.pdf
Oxfam International and European Women’s Lobby. (2010). Women’s poverty and social exclusion in the European Union at a time of recession. An invisible crisis? http://www.socialwatch.eu/wcm/womens_poverty_and_social_exclusion.html
Rado, P. (2013). A PISA eredmények romlásának okairól (valami megroggyant). [On the reasons of worsening PISA outcomes]. http://oktpolcafe.hu/a-pisa-eredmenyek-2012-es-romlasanak-okairol-valami-megroggyant-2313/
Report of the Ombudsman. (2008). OBH 1024/2008, Beszámoló az állampolgári jogok országgyűlési biztosának tevékenységéről (Report on the activities of the Ombudsman). http://www.eoi.at/d/EOI%20-%20Jahresberichte/Ungarn/Lux%20-%20Hungarian%20Annual%20Report%202008.pdf
Report of the Ombudsman. (2010). Az állampolgári jogok országgyűlési biztosának Jelentése az AJB-3809/2010. számú ügyben. (Report of the Ombudsman on the case no. AJB-3809/2010) www.liganet.hu/news/6201/AJB-3809-2010.doc
Report on the implementation of the EU framework for the Roma National Integration Strategies. (2014). http://ec.europa.eu/justice/discrimination/files/roma_implement_strategies2014_en.pdf
Szabone, K. J. (2010). Az esélyteremtő óvodáztatás. http://www.szabonekarmanjudit.hu/wp-content/uploads/2010/08/Az-esélyteremtő-óvodáztatás.pdf
TARKI Social Research Institute and DG Employment. (2010). Social affairs and equal opportunities child poverty and child well-being in the European Union, report for the European Commission. Budapest http://www.tarki.hu/en/research/childpoverty/report/child_poverty_final%20report_jan2010.pdf
The Extreme Right in Contemporary Europe. (2009) History, interpretation and performance, special issue. Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 17(2) http://www.tandfonline.com/toc/cjea20/17/2#.U8sh_FbgLwI
UK Sure Start Program. (2004). http://www.foundationyears.org.uk/making-it-happen/sure-start-children-centres/
United Nations. (2009). Guidelines for the alternative care of children, A/HRC/11/L.13 http://www.unicef.org/aids/files/UN_Guidelines_for_alternative_care_of_children.pdf
University of Nottingham. (2012). Child abandonment and its prevention in Europe, pp. 10–13. http://www.crin.org/docs/MANUAL%20OF%20GOOD%20PRACTICE.pdf
Verdes, T., Scharle, A., & Varad, B. (2012) Intézet helyett. A fogyatékos személyeket támogató szociálpolitika megújításának lehetséges irányairól [Instead of institutions: Possible directions of the renewal of social policy supporting persons with disability]. http://www.asz.hu/jelentes/1286/jelentes-a-pszichiatriai-betegellatas-atalakitasanak-ellenorzeserol/1286j000.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Herczog, M. (2015). Poor Children, Poor Services, Poor Outcomes: Child Poverty and Its Impact on Referral and Placement in Public Care System in Hungary. In: Fernandez, E., Zeira, A., Vecchiato, T., Canali, C. (eds) Theoretical and Empirical Insights into Child and Family Poverty. Children’s Well-Being: Indicators and Research, vol 10. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17506-5_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17506-5_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17505-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17506-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawSocial Sciences (R0)