Department of Surgery, Harvard University · Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles

Radar chart profiling Department of Surgery, Harvard University and Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles on output, citations, h-index, impact, reach and breadth — A profile, not a scoreboard: further out means more of that measure, never better. Each axis is scaled to the larger of the two on a log scale.

Output	Department of Surgery, Harvard University	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles	Larger
Indexed articlesDocuments attributed to the organisation.	15,562	14,700	Department of Surgery, Harvard University
CitationsCitations those documents have received.	850,636	1,249,324	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles
Articles in 2-star journalsOutput placed in the second tier of journals.	3,715	5,499	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles
Articles in 3-star journalsOutput placed in the top tier of journals.	309	569	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles

Reach	Department of Surgery, Harvard University	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles	Larger
Peer-reviewed h-indexDepth of the cited record rather than its recent average.	291	370	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles
h-index (all documents)The same across every indexed document, not only peer-reviewed ones.	337	420	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles
2-year impactCitations in the last two years per citable item.	—	—	—
Score C tierWhere the prestige-weighted citation ratio places it among all organisations of its type. Tier 1 is the top 5%.	2	1	Department of Surgery, Harvard University

Spread of the work	Department of Surgery, Harvard University	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles	Larger
Journals citing the workHow widely the output is picked up, counted in distinct journals.	16,190	13,429	Department of Surgery, Harvard University
Disciplines citing the workHow far outside its own subjects the output travels.	144	143	comparable
Journals published inDistinct journals the organisation has appeared in.	6,279	4,395	Department of Surgery, Harvard University
Disciplines published inHow broad the research programme is.	243	213	Department of Surgery, Harvard University
Open-access shareShare of articles under an open licence, among those whose licence could be read.	26.6%	41.5%	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles

How the work is cited over time	Department of Surgery, Harvard University	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles	Larger
Self-citation rateCitations whose citing paper comes from the same organisation.	3.1%	4.5%	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles
Citation half-lifeYears over which half of an article's citations arrive. A longer half-life means work that keeps being read.	15.32	19.05	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles
Immediacy indexHow quickly citations start arriving after publication.	0.90	1.38	Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles

This describes the indexed record of each school and nothing else. The two are very often of different sizes, and most of the measures above grow with size, so a larger figure means a larger organisation before it means anything else. Nothing here ranks one against the other. Full detail: Department of Surgery, Harvard University · Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles · compare a different pair.

Download this comparison:JSON CSV

What this page is

This is a description, not a ranking. Two schools are put side by side so the differences between them are visible — how much they publish, how widely it is cited, how far it travels and how it ages. No measure here is presented as better than another, and no overall verdict is drawn, because there is no single question a school comparison answers the way "where should this paper go" is answered for journals.

Reading the chart

The chart summarises six of the measures below. It is a profile, not a scoreboard: further out means more of that thing, never better.

Output — indexed articles attributed to the organisation.
Citations — citations those articles have received.
Depth — the peer-reviewed h-index, which describes the depth of the cited record rather than its recent average.
Impact — the 2-year impact: citations in the last two years per citable item. This is the one axis that does not simply grow with size.
Reach — how many distinct journals cite the work, i.e. how widely it is picked up.
Breadth — how many distinct disciplines the organisation publishes in.

Each axis is scaled to the larger of the two on a log scale. Four of the six grow with size, so a large organisation beside a small one will look larger on most of them — that is the difference in scale being shown, not a difference in quality.

Comparable schools

Department of Surgery, Harvard University vs Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of California, Los Angeles