Biology, Harvard University · Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University

Radar chart profiling Biology, Harvard University and Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University on output, citations, h-index, impact, reach and breadth — A profile, not a scoreboard: further out means more of that measure, never better. Each axis is scaled to the larger of the two on a log scale.

Output	Biology, Harvard University	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University	Larger
Indexed articlesDocuments attributed to the organisation.	432	2,301	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
CitationsCitations those documents have received.	41,567	127,272	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
Articles in 2-star journalsOutput placed in the second tier of journals.	97	555	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
Articles in 3-star journalsOutput placed in the top tier of journals.	32	30	Biology, Harvard University

Reach	Biology, Harvard University	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University	Larger
Peer-reviewed h-indexDepth of the cited record rather than its recent average.	78	120	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
h-index (all documents)The same across every indexed document, not only peer-reviewed ones.	92	136	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
2-year impactCitations in the last two years per citable item.	—	—	—
Score C tierWhere the prestige-weighted citation ratio places it among all organisations of its type. Tier 1 is the top 5%.	2	2	comparable

Spread of the work	Biology, Harvard University	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University	Larger
Journals citing the workHow widely the output is picked up, counted in distinct journals.	5,332	12,303	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
Disciplines citing the workHow far outside its own subjects the output travels.	136	141	comparable
Journals published inDistinct journals the organisation has appeared in.	522	2,331	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
Disciplines published inHow broad the research programme is.	129	255	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
Open-access shareShare of articles under an open licence, among those whose licence could be read.	44.2%	45.2%	comparable

How the work is cited over time	Biology, Harvard University	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University	Larger
Self-citation rateCitations whose citing paper comes from the same organisation.	0.9%	1.4%	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University
Citation half-lifeYears over which half of an article's citations arrive. A longer half-life means work that keeps being read.	14.61	11.96	Biology, Harvard University
Immediacy indexHow quickly citations start arriving after publication.	0.25	0.89	Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University

This describes the indexed record of each school and nothing else. The two are very often of different sizes, and most of the measures above grow with size, so a larger figure means a larger organisation before it means anything else. Nothing here ranks one against the other. Full detail: Biology, Harvard University · Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University · compare a different pair.

Download this comparison:JSON CSV

What this page is

This is a description, not a ranking. Two schools are put side by side so the differences between them are visible — how much they publish, how widely it is cited, how far it travels and how it ages. No measure here is presented as better than another, and no overall verdict is drawn, because there is no single question a school comparison answers the way "where should this paper go" is answered for journals.

Reading the chart

The chart summarises six of the measures below. It is a profile, not a scoreboard: further out means more of that thing, never better.

Output — indexed articles attributed to the organisation.
Citations — citations those articles have received.
Depth — the peer-reviewed h-index, which describes the depth of the cited record rather than its recent average.
Impact — the 2-year impact: citations in the last two years per citable item. This is the one axis that does not simply grow with size.
Reach — how many distinct journals cite the work, i.e. how widely it is picked up.
Breadth — how many distinct disciplines the organisation publishes in.

Each axis is scaled to the larger of the two on a log scale. Four of the six grow with size, so a large organisation beside a small one will look larger on most of them — that is the difference in scale being shown, not a difference in quality.

Comparable schools

Biology, Harvard University vs Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard University