Metrika

  • citati u SCIndeksu: [1]
  • citati u CrossRef-u:[2]
  • citati u Google Scholaru:[]
  • posete u poslednjih 30 dana:11
  • preuzimanja u poslednjih 30 dana:8

Sadržaj

članak: 1 od 1  
Ekonomika preduzeća
2017, vol. 65, br. 7-8, str. 506-517
Značaj EU pretpristupnih fondova za poljoprivredu i njihov uticaj na konkurentnost zemlje
Šestović Marinaa, Radosavljević Katicab ORCID, Chroneos Krasavac Biljanac ORCID
aGIZ, Serbia
bUniverzitet u Beogradu, Ekonomski fakultet, Srbija
cUniverzitet u Beogradu, Ekonomski fakultet, Katedra za statistiku i matematiku, Srbija
Projekat:
Strategijske i taktičke mere za rešavanje krize konkurentnosti realnog sektora u Srbiji (MPNTR - 179050)

Sažetak
IPARD je peta komponenta instrumenta za pretpristupnu pomoć (IPA) Evropske unije (EU) ustanovljena 2006. godine. Implementacija IPARD programa je počela krajem 2009. godine i stoga nedostaju dublje analize njihovog korišćenja i realizacije. Zvanični godišnji izveštaji o realizaciji dostupni su na sajtu upravnih organa EU, ali za bolji uvid potrebna su dodatna istraživanja. Glavni cilj ovog rada je da se oceni uticaj IPA sredstava na konkurentnost zemlje uzimajući u obzir i podatke o sredstvima koja su posebno namenjena za potrebe razvoja poljoprivrede (IPARD) i to sa stanovišta njihovog uticaja na izvoz poljoprivrednih proizvoda u zemljama korisnicima. Pored toga, analiza podataka o pokretanju biznisa i prekograničnoj trgovini, kao i njihova korelacija sa podacima o apsorpciji IPA fondova, korišćena je da se utvrdi značaj EU pretpristupnih fondova za unapređenje konkurentnosti zemlje. Sprovedeno istraživanje zasniva se na raspoloživim podacima EU statistike i Doing Business izveštaja Svetske banke. Drugi korišćeni izvori informacija vezuju se za Agenciju za agrarna plaćanja, Ministarstvo finansija i Upravu za trezor Republike Srbije. Autori su mišljenja da ovaj rad značajno doprinosi unapređenju znanja o strukturi IPARD programa i EU fondovima koji stoje na raspolaganju zemljama kandidatima. Izvedeni zaključci na osnovu dobijenih rezultata istraživanja, kao i iskustva drugih zemalja u okruženju, treba da posluže kao primer za bolju i uspešniju implementaciju IPARD sredstava u Srbiji u budućnosti, jer se fokusiraju na glavne probleme sa kojima se zemlje korisnice susreću u procesu apsorpcije navedenih sredstava.
Reference

Ackermann, R., Blomeyer, R., Perreau, E., Smit, J., Malan, J. (2016) Turkey: How the pre-accession funds have been spent, managed, controlled and the monitoring system?. Brussels: European Parliament-Directorate general for internal policies-Policy Department on Budgetary Affairs

Cardwell, M. (2002) Agriculture, the EC and the WTO: A Legal Critical Analysis of the Concepts of Sustainability and Multifunctionality. Environmental Law Review, 4(3): 144-155

Colović, L.A., Trilling, M. (2013) Govorimo o IPA II. Subotica: Centar za ekologiju i ruralni razvoj

4

Daugbjerg, C., Swinbank, A. (2007) The Politics of CAP Reform: Trade Negotiations, Institutional Settings and Blame Avoidance. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(1): 1-22

Daugbjerg, C., Swinbank, A. (2011) Explaining the 'Health Check’ of the Common Agricultural Policy: budgetary politics, globalisation and paradigm change revisited. Policy Studies, 32(2): 127-141

Dimitrova, A., Toshkov, D. (2007) The Dynamics of Domestic Coordination of EU Policy in the New Member States: Impossible to Lock In?. West European Politics, 30(5): 961-986

European Commission (2013) EU budget 2013 Financial Report. Retrieved 26 November 2017 from http://ec.europa.eu/ budget/financialreport/2013/lib/financial_report_2013_en.pdf

European Commission (2013) Instrument for pre-accession assistance (IPA). Multi-annual indicative financial framework for 2010-2012. Retrieved 15 November 2017 from http://aei. pitt.edu/45591/

European Commission (2013) Overview of the CAP reform 2014-2020. Agricultural policy perspectives briefs. Retrieved 13 November 2017 from https://ec.europa.eu/agriculture/sites/ agriculture/files/policy-perspectives/policy-briefs/05_en.pdf

European Commission (2014) Progress report on Serbia. Retrieved 15 November 2017 from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/ en/index.htm

European Commission (2013) Rural development in the EU. Report 2013. Retrieved 25 November 2017 from http:// ec.europa. eu/agriculture/statistics/rural-development/2013/ full-text_ en.pdf

Gärtner, L., Hörner, J., Obholzer, L. (2011) National Coordination of EU Policy: A Comparative Study of the Twelve 'New' Member States. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 7(1): 77-100

Knežević, I. (2010) Apsorpcioni kapaciteti Srbije za korišćenje EU fondova - praktična iskustva iz Slovačke. Beograd: Evropski pokret u Srbiji

Ministry for EU Affaires, Republic of Turkey (2016) Turkey-EU financial cooperation. Retrieved 26 November 2017 from https://www.ab.gov.tr/5_en.html

Ministry of Agriculture and Environmental Protection, Republic of Serbia (2015) IPARD programme for 2014-2020. Retrieved 18 November 2017 from https://ipard.co.rs/doc/IPARD%20 2014-2020.pdf

1

Potter, C., Tilzey, M. (2005) Agricultural policy discourses in the European post-Fordist transition: neoliberalism, neomercantilism and multifunctionality. Progress in Human Geography, 29(5): 581-600

Radosavljević, K. (2017) Marketing channels and competitiveness of maize in Serbia. Management: Journal for Theory and Practice Management, vol. 22, br. 1, str. 59-70

Stanig, P., Kayser, M. (2013) Governance Indicators: Some Proposals. u: Governance Challenges and Innovations, Oxford University Press (OUP), str. 188-220

Szemlér, T. (2008) EU financial support for the Western-Balkans: Well-suited to real needs?. u: Balazs P. [ur.] Using IPA and Other EU Funds to Accelerate Convergence and Integration in the Western-Balkans, Budapest: Center for EU enlargement studies

Tatar, M. (2010) Estonian local government absorption capacity of EU structural funds. Halduskultuur - administrative culture, 11(2): 202-226

3

Tatham, A.F. (2009) Enlargement of the European Union. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International

Vrbanek, J. (2017) Utilization of IPA-RD programme in the Republic of Croatia. Zagreb: Faculty of Agriculture

World Bank-IBRD (2006-2013) Doing business report. Washington, The World Bank/IBRD

World Bank-IBRD (2017) By country export partner share in percentage for world between 1988 and 2016: Export partner share %. World integrated trade solution. Retrieved 26 November 2017 from https://wits.worldbank. org/CountryProfile/en/country/by-country/startyear/LTST/ endyear/LTST/tradeFlow/Export/partner/WLD/indicator/XP

World Bank-IBRD (2017) Export in thousand US$ for food all countries between 2007 and 2014. World integrated trade solution, Retrieved 29 November 2017 from https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/MKD/StartYear/2007/EndYear/2014/TradeFlow/Export/Indicator/XPRT-TRD-VL/Partner/BY-

World Bank-IBRD (2017) Starting a business - DTF: Doing business historical data sets and trends data 2017. Retrieved November 2017 from http://www.doingbusiness.org/ Custom-Query

World Bank-IBRD (2017) World exports, imports, tariff by year: World trade summary. World integrated trade solution, Retrieved 26 November 2017 from https://wits.worldbank.org/CountryProfile/en/Country/WLD/Year/2014/Summary
   

O članku

jezik rada: engleski
vrsta rada: izvorni naučni članak
DOI: 10.5937/EKOPRE1708506S
objavljen u SCIndeksu: 26.04.2018.

Povezani članci

Nema povezanih članaka