Skip to main content
Log in

An Origin of Citations: Darwin’s Collaborators and Their Contributions to the Origin of Species

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of the History of Biology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 14 June 2021

This article has been updated

Abstract

In the first edition of the Origin of Species (1859), Charles Darwin apologized for not correctly referencing all the works cited in his magnum opus. More than 150 years later we have catalogued these citations and analyzed the resultant data. Looking for a complete selection of collaborators, a flexible interpretation of the term citation was necessary; we define it as any reference made to a third party, independently of its form or function. Following the same idea, the sixth edition of the Origin, originally published in 1872 and reprinted with minor additions and corrections in 1876, was chosen for the research because it represents the end of a long debate between Darwin and his peers. It naturally is the edition with the greatest number of citations and collaborators. Through a diverse theoretical analysis, we aim to present a new perspective for the study of the Origin of Species: a bibliographic approach that provides the tools needed to understand the history of the book as a physical and cultural object. Bibliometrics provides a theory of citations as well as a quantitative analysis; science studies highlights the profound social aspects of science in the making. The analysis resulted in 639 citations to 298 collaborators and provided a new perspective of the rhetorical structure of the Origin, even though these results are only the tip of the iceberg of the potential of all the data gathered in this study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Graph 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Notes

  1. To W. D. Fox, 21 [July 1858], Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter 2312,” accessed 5 January 2020, http://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2312.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 7.

  2. To J. D Hooker, [5 August 1858], Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter 2313,” accessed 5 January 2020, http://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2313.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 7.

  3. To J. D. Hooker, 12 [October 1858], Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter 2339,” accessed 5 January 2020, darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2339.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 7.

  4. Two other annotated editions of Origin, a Brazilian translation of the first edition by Nélio Bizzo (Darwin 2018) and a Portuguese translation of the sixth edition by Ana Afonso (Darwin 2009), also include similar notes about Darwin’s collaborators, but set aside the quest for the references. Afonso’s edition is the only Portuguese translation available on Darwin Online, but it has many errors in its notes, and thus needs to be used carefully as a research resource. For example, on page 145 John Edward Gray is misidentified as Asa Gray (https://darwin-online.org.uk/converted/pdf/2009_OriginPortuguese_F2062.7.pdf).

  5. However, it is not the first citation in the history of science, since books preceded the scientific journals; see Leydesdorff and Wouters (1999, p. 173).

  6. Waters (2003, p. 117) hypothesised that part of Origin’s success might have come from its less formal style.

  7. Three out of the five first options on Amazon.com are from the first edition.

  8. We verified this claim by using an online tool for text comparison (diffchecker.com) and through the document comparison tool available in Microsoft Word.

  9. Shapin (1994) extensively discuss the role of gentlemanly science in seventeenth-century society. Hodge (2003, p. 65) claims that this was still applicable to the naturalists of the early nineteenth century.

  10. Unfortunately, we were unable to find a digital version of this document and resorted to Ellegård’s account.

  11. Abu'l-Fath Jalal-ud-din Muhammad Akbar, emperor of the Mughal Empire (1526–1857), which comprised most of modern India.

  12. To J. D. Hooker, 16 January [1869], “Letter 6557,” Accessed 5 January 2020. https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-6557.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 17.

  13. See Morris (1994) for a lengthy commentary on Jenkin’s review and its effects on Darwin.

  14. To W. E. Darwin, [26 May 1858], “Letter 2266,” Accessed 5 January 2020, https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2266.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol 7.

  15. See, for example, “On the Termination of the Visceral Arterioles of Arion rufus,” published in Comptes rendu of the French Academy of Sciences in 1879 and s in Annals and Magazine of Natural History 3 (1879): 243.

  16. To C. Lyell, 22 May [1860], “Letter 2812,” Accessed 5 Jan. 2020, https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2812.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 8.

  17. From H. G. H. Norman, 30 November 1866, “Letter 5287,” Accessed 5 Jan. 2020. https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-5287.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 14.

  18. From C. Kingsley, 18 November 1859, “Letter 2534;” to C. Kingsley, 30 November [1859], “Letter 2561,” Accessed 5 Jan. 2020, https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-2561.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 7.

  19. Gross, Harmon, and Reidy (2009, p. 9) define presentation as “the ways the text of the scientific article is organized and the ways in which its data are displayed. Citations and headings are features of presentation; so are tables and graphics.” This is an expanded definition of Aristotle’s presentation, one of the three categories of classical rhetoric.

  20. To J. D. Hooker, 16 September [1871], Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 7949” and footnote 5, accessed 5 Jan. 2020, https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-7949.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 19.

  21. To J. Murray, 23 September [1871], Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 7964,” accessed 5 Jan. 2020, https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-7964.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 19.

  22. To A. R. Wallace, 12 July [1871], Darwin Correspondence Project, “Letter no. 7858,” accessed 5 Jan. 2020, https://darwinproject.ac.uk/letter/DCP-LETT-7858.xml. Also published in The Correspondence of Charles Darwin, vol. 19.

  23. See Regner (2006) for a more in-depth analysis of Darwin’s rhetoric against Mivart.

References

  • Bellanger, T. 1977. Bibliography Defined, in Book Collecting: A Modern Guide, ed. Jean Peters, 97–101. New York, NY: R. R. Bowker. Excerpted by The Bibliographical Society of America. https://bibsocamer.org/publications/bibliography-defined.

  • Bordalejo, B. 2009. Introduction to the Online Variorum of Darwin’s Origin of Species. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/Variorum/Introduction.html.

  • Browne, J. 2006. Darwin’s Origin of Species: A Biography. London: Atlantic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, F.W. 1961. Two Letters from John Herschel to Charles Lyell, 1836–1837. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 105: 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, W.B. 1860. Review V. British and Foreign Medico-chirurgical Review 25: 367–404. Internet Archive: https://archive.org/details/britishandforei50unkngoog/page/n460.

  • Chambers, R. 1853. Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation. 10th ed. London: Churchill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, R. 1884. Vestiges of the Natural History of Creation, 12th ed. Preface by Alexander Ireland, vii–xxxi. Edinburgh: W. & R. Chambers. Internet Archive. https://archive.org/details/vestigesnatural02chamgoog/page/n10.

  • Darwin, C.R. 1842. The Structure and Distribution of Coral Reefs. London: Smith Elder and Co. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F271&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Darwin, C.R. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: John Murray. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F373&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Darwin, C. R. (1859) 2011. The Annotated Origin: A Facsimile of the First Edition of On the Origin of Species. Introduction and notes by J.T. Costa. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University.

  • Darwin, C.R. 1860. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 2nd ed. New York: Appleton. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F380&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Darwin, C.R. 1868. The Variation of Animals and Plants under Domestication. 2. Vols. London: John Murray. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/EditorialIntroductions/Freeman_VariationunderDomestication.html.

  • Darwin, C.R. 1872. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 6th ed. London: John Murray. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F391&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Darwin, C.R. 1876. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. 6th ed., with additions and corrections. London: John Murray. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=text&itemID=F401&pageseq=1.

  • Darwin, C.R. (1959) 2006. The Origin of Species: A Variorum Text. Edited by Morris Peckham. Reprint edition. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.

  • Darwin, C.R. 2009. A origem das espécies através da selecção natural. 6th ed. Translated and annotated by Ana Afonso. Leça da Palmeira: Planeta Vivo.

  • Darwin, C. R. 2018. Sobre a origem das espécies por meio da seleção natural. 1st ed. Translated by Daniel M. Miranda, annotated by Nélio Bizzo. São Paulo, Brazil: Edipro.

  • Darwin, C.R., and A.R. Wallace. 1858. On the Tendency of Species to Form Varieties; and the Perpetuation of Varieties and Species by Natural Means of Selection. Journal of the Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London. Zoology 3: 45–62. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?viewtype=text&itemID=F1699b&pageseq=1.

  • Ellegård, A. 1990. Darwin and the General Reader. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. B. 1977. The Works of Charles Darwin. 2d ed. Dawson: Archon Books. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=A1&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Garfield, E. 1974. Historiographs, Librarianship and the History of Science. Essays of an Informational Scientist. 2: 134–149. https://garfield.library.upenn.edu/essays/v2p136y1974-76.pdf. Accessed 4 Jan. 2020.

  • Gingras, Y. 2016. Os desvios da avaliação da pesquisa. Translated by Carlos Deane. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: Editora UFRJ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A.G., J.E. Harmon, and M.S. Reidy. 2009. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from the 17th Century to the Present. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, A.G., J.E. Harmon, and M. Reidy. 2002. Communicating Science: The Scientific Article from theSeventeenth Century to the Present. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, J. 1992. Darwin’s Argument in the Origin. Philosophy of Science 59: 461–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodge, J. 2003. The Notebook Programmes and Projects of Darwin’s London Years. In The Cambridge Companion to Darwin, eds. J. Hodge, G. Radick, 40–68. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, C. 2019. Charles Darwin, Richard Owen, and Natural Selection: A Question of Priority. Journal of the History of Biology 52 (1): 45–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. 2003. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society. 11th printing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Leydesdorff, L. 1998. Theories of Citation? Scientometrics 43: 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., and P. Wouters. 1999. Between Texts and Contexts: Advances in Theories of Citation? (A Rejoinder). Scientometrics 44: 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, B.R., P. Nightingale, and A. Yegros-Yegros. 2012. Science and Technology Studies: Exploring the Knowledge Base. Research Policy 41 (7): 1182–1204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, D.F. 1999. Bibliography and the Sociology of Texts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K. 1968. The Matthew Effect in Science: The reward and communication systems of science are considered. Science 159 (3810): 56–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J., and L. Leydesdorff. 2015. A Review of Theory and Practice of Scientometrics. European Journal of Operational Research 246: 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mivart, S.G. 1871. On the Genesis of Species. London: Macmillan and Co.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, S.W. 1994. Fleeming Jenkin and "The Origin of Species": A Reassessment. British Journal for the History of Science 27: 313–343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mubarak, A.A.I. 1800. Ayeen Akbery. Vol. 1. Translated by Francis Gladwin. London: G. Auld. Internet Archive, https://archive.org/details/b22039545_0001/page/n5.

  • Navarro, P.L., and C.A. Machado. 2019. Data from: Al. et Darwin: An Analysis of the Citations on The Origin of Species. Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.b678k40.

  • Navarro, P.L., C.A. Machado, and L.M. Bellini. 2017. Frequência e contexto de citação dos colaboradores de Charles Darwin na Origem das espécies: levantamento, seleção e produção de verbetes, Anais do 26º Encontro Anual de Iniciação Científica. https://www.eaic.uem.br/eaic2017/anais/artigos/2028.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan. 2020.

  • Ogawa, M. 2001. The Mysterious Mr. Collins: Living for 140 Years in Origin of Species. Journal of the History of Biology 34(3): 461–479.

  • Oldenburg, H. 1665. An Accompt [sic] of the Improvement of Optick Glasses. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 1: 2–3.

  • Pan, J. 1984. Charles Darwin’s Chinese Sources. Isis 75: 530–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Regner, A.C.K.P. 2006. A polêmica Darwin versus Mivart: uma lição em refutar objeções. Filosofia e História da Biologia 1: 55–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. 1996. The Darwin Industry: A Guide. Victorian Studies 39: 217–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saint-Hilaire, I. G. 1847. Vie, travaux et doctrine scientifique d'Étienne Geoffroy Saint-Hilaire. Paris: P. Bertrand. Gallica, https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k862567.

  • Sengupta, I.N. 1992. Bibliometrics, Informetrics, Scientometrics and Librametrics: An Overview. Libri 42: 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapin, S. 1994. A Social History of Truth. Chicago, IL and London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stauffer, R.C., ed. 1975. Charles Darwin’s Natural Selection; being the Second Part of his Big Species Book written from 1856 to 1858. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=F1583&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Thomson Reuters. 2008. Whitepaper: Using Bibliometrics: A Guide to Evaluating Research Performance with Citation Data. Thomson Reuters,https://ips.clarivate.com/m/pdfs/325133_thomson.pdf. Accessed 5 Jan. 2020.

  • van Wyhe, J., ed. 2002–. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/.

  • van Wyhe, J. 2009. Darwin Online and the Evolution of the Darwin Industry. History of Science 47: 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A.R. 1889. Darwinism. London: Macmillan and Co. John van Wyhe, ed. 2002-. The Complete Work of Charles Darwin Online. https://darwin-online.org.uk/content/frameset?itemID=A1015&viewtype=text&pageseq=1.

  • Waters, C.K. 2003. The Arguments in the Origin of Species. In The Cambridge Companion to Darwin, ed. J. Hodge and G. Radick, 116–139. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior) and the Fundação Araucária, Brazil, for funding this research. We are also grateful to JHB editors, Karen Rader and Marsha Richmond, and anonymous reviewers for suggestions that greatly improved the paper, and to Luzia Marta Bellini, Roger Domenech Colacios, and Francine Marcondes Castro Oliveira, who first read and provided corrections to the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pedro de Lima Navarro.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Lima Navarro, P., de Amorim Machado, C. An Origin of Citations: Darwin’s Collaborators and Their Contributions to the Origin of Species. J Hist Biol 53, 45–79 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-020-09592-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-020-09592-8

Keywords

Navigation