Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-06T12:52:04.730Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

28 - Behavioral Insights, Public Policy, and Human Rights

from Part III - Contemporary Issues in Psychology and Human Rights

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2020

Neal S. Rubin
Affiliation:
Adler University
Roseanne L. Flores
Affiliation:
Hunter College, City University of New York
Get access

Summary

The chapter outlines how behavioral insights can aid measures to enhance human rights. It introduces the origins of behavioral insights and explains how they can encourage positive behaviors, enhance access to service, and strengthen human rights institutions. The chapter goes on to examine the limitations of behavioural insights and to discuss the ethical implications of their use.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aral, S., & Walker, D. (2011). Identifying social influence in networks using randomized experiments. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 26(5), 91–96.Google Scholar
Bhawuk, D. P. S., Carr, S. C., Gloss, A. E., & Foster Thompson, L. (2014). Poverty reduction through positive work cycles: Exploring the role of information about work, culture and diversity, and organizational justice. In Al-Atiqi, S. (Ed.), Barriers to and opportunities for poverty reduction: Prospects for private-sector led interventions (Background paper to the United Nations Development Programme 2014 foundational report The Role of the Private Sector in Inclusive Development: Barriers and Opportunities at the Base of the Pyramid). Istanbul: United Nations Development Programme. www.undp.org/content/dam/istanbul/docs/2014_Barriers_to_and_Prospects_for_Poverty_Reduction.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office. (2012). Applying behavioral insights to reduce fraud, error and debt. www.gov.uk/government/publications/fraud-error-and-debt-behavioural-insights-team-paperGoogle Scholar
Dolan, P., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., King, D., & Vlaev, I. (2010). MINDSPACE: Influencing behavior for public policy. London: Institute of Government.Google Scholar
Fink, G., Levenson, R., Tembo, S., & Rockers, P. (2017). Home- and community-based growth monitoring to reduce early life growth faltering: An open-label, cluster-randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 106(4), 1070–1077.Google Scholar
Foster, L. L. (2017). Applying behavioural insights to organizations: Theoretical underpinnings. Paper commissioned by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG-Regio). www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Foster_Applying-Behavioural-Insights-to-Organisations.pdfGoogle Scholar
Foster, L. (2019). The present of work. People Science. https://peoplescience.maritz.com/Articles/2019/The-Present-of-WorkGoogle Scholar
Halpern, D. (2015). Inside the nudge unit: How small changes can make a big difference. London: Penguin Random House UK.Google Scholar
Hansen, P., & Jespersen, A. (2013). Nudge and the manipulation of choice: A framework for the responsible use of the nudge approach to behaviour change in public policy. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 4(1), 3–28.Google Scholar
Hicken, A., Leider, S., Ravanilla, N., & Yang, D. (2015). Measuring vote-selling: Field evidence from the Philippines. American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, 105(5), 352–356.Google Scholar
Ideas42. (2013, July 12). Don’t suppose, diagnose! The BETA project. www.ideas42.org/blog/dont-suppose-diagnose-beta-project/Google Scholar
Innovations for Poverty Action. (2014). Chlorine dispensers for safe water in Kenya. New Haven, CT: Author. www.poverty-action.org/study/chlorine-dispensers-safe-water-kenyaGoogle Scholar
Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973). On the psychology of prediction. Psychological Review, 80(4), 237–251.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39(4), 341–350.Google Scholar
Kotler, P., & Levy, S. J. (1969). Broadening the concept of marketing. Journal of Marketing, 33(1), 10–15.Google Scholar
Levav, J., & Fitzsimons, G. (2006). When questions change behavior: The role of ease of representation. Psychological Science, 17(3), 207–213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. (2018). Human rights and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. www.ohchr.org/EN/issues/MDG/Pages/The2030Agenda.aspxGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2017). Behavioural insights and public policy: Lessons from around the world. Paris, France: Author. www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/behavioural-insights-and-public-policy-9789264270480-en.htmGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018a). Behavioural insights. www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/behavioural-insights.htmGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2018b). Rethinking regional development policy-making. www.oecd.org/governance/rethinking-regional-development-policy-making-9789264293014-en.htmGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Richburg-Hayes, L., Anzelone, C., Dechausay, N., & Landers, P. (2017). Nudging change in human services: Final report of the Behavioral Interventions to Advance Self-Sufficiency (BIAS) Project. OPRE Report 2017–23. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169.Google Scholar
Service, O., Hallsworth, M., Halpern, D., Algate, F., Gallagher, R., Nguyen, S., Ruda, S., & Sanders, M. (2014). EAST: Four simple ways to apply behavioral insights. The Behavioural Insights Team. https://38r8om2xjhhl25mw24492dir-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/BIT-Publication-EAST_FA_WEB.pdfGoogle Scholar
Shephard, D. (2017). Applying behavioural insights to organisations: Global case studies. Paper commissioned by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) for the European Commission’s Directorate-General for Regional and Urban Policy (DG-Regio). www.oecd.org/cfe/regional-policy/Shepard_Applying-Behavioural-Insights-to-Organisations_Case-Studies.pdfGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1956). Rational choice and the structure of the environment. Psychological Review, 63(2), 129–138.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spreitzer, G., & Sonenshein, S. (2004). Towards a construct definition of positive deviance. American Behavioral Scientist, 47, 828–847.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2014). Nudging: A very short guide. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(4), 583–588.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C. R. (2015). Nudges do not undermine human agency. Journal of Consumer Policy, 38, 207–210.Google Scholar
Thaler, R. H., & Sunstein, C. R. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. New Haven, CT & London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
The Behavioural Insights Team. (2019). International development report 2019. www.bi.team/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/BIT_International_V4-Interactive-28.3.19.pdfGoogle Scholar
United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Behavioural insights at the United Nations: Achieving Agenda 2030. www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/development-impact/behavioural-insights-at-the-united-nations--achieving-agenda-203.htmlGoogle Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. (2010). The human right to water and sanitation, A/RES/64/292. www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/64/292Google Scholar
United Nations General Assembly. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, A/RES/70/1. www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=EGoogle Scholar
Wilkinson, M. (2013, August 29). Nudges manipulate, except when they don’t. London School of Economics and Political Science. http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/nudges-manipulate-except-when-they-dont/Google Scholar
Woods, A. K. (2010). A behavioral approach to human rights. Harvard International Law Journal, 51(1), 51–112.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×