Skip to main content
Log in

Cyber Trust

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

From a sociological and anthropological viewpoint, the ability of complete strangers to carry out transactions that involve significant risk to one or both parties should be complicated by a lack of trust. Yet the rise of e-commerce and “sharing economy” platforms suggests that concerns that seemed prevalent only a few decades ago have been largely assuaged. What mechanisms have been used to facilitate trust between strangers online? Can we measure the extent to which users trust each other when interacting online? This article reviews the existing literature on cyber trust and proposes directions for further research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. See L. Hosmer (1995). Trust: The connecting link between organizational theory and philosophical ethics, Academy of Management Review, 20(2), 379–403; E. H. Creyer and W. T. Ross, (1997). The influence of firm behavior on purchase intention: Do consumers really care about business ethics? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14(6), 421–4; M. Carrigan and A. Attalla (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer—Do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? The Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(1), 560; I. D. Nebenzahl, E. D. Jaffe, and B. Kavak (2001). Consumers' punishment-and rewarding process via purchasing behaviour. Teaching Business Ethics, 5(1), 238–3.

  2. See also R. Michie (1999). The London Stock Exchange: a history. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

  3. Marcel Mauss’ seminal essay “The Gift” was the first to document the social obligations that attended gift-giving, but the topic has been taken up by numerous anthropologists since.

  4. The Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Association maintains a list of incidents involving Uber and Lyft: http://www.whosdrivingyou.org/rideshare-incidents.

  5. Although for more expensive items, negative ratings suppress price premiums. See S. Ba and P. Pavlou (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: Price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 243–268.

  6. Amazon listing: https://www.amazon.com/Images-SI-Uranium-Ore/dp/B000796XXM/ref=pd_sbs_236_2?_encoding=UTF8&psc=1&refRID=M46PMC7PCNW192NW4K34 last accessed on January 19, 2017.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amitai Etzioni.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Amitai Etzioni declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

I am indebted to David Kroeker-Maus for extensive research assistance on this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Etzioni, A. Cyber Trust. J Bus Ethics 156, 1–13 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3627-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3627-y

Keywords

Navigation