The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law Further Intersections of Public and Private Law
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law
- The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- PART I Standardization and the State
- PART II Standardization, Health, Safety and Liability
- PART III Copyright and Standards
- PART IV Standards and Software
- PART V Trademarks, Certification and Standards
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 04 September 2019
Edited by
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law
- The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Preface
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction
- PART I Standardization and the State
- PART II Standardization, Health, Safety and Liability
- PART III Copyright and Standards
- PART IV Standards and Software
- PART V Trademarks, Certification and Standards
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization LawFurther Intersections of Public and Private Law, pp. 269 - 298Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 1979. “Recommendation 78-4, Federal Agency Interaction with Private Standard-Setting Organizations in Health and Safety Regulation.” Federal Register 44(4): 1357–1359.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 2011. “Recommendation 2011–5, Incorporation by Reference,” Federal Register 77(10): 2257–2259.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 2012a. “Recommendation 2011–5, Incorporation by Reference,” Federal Register. 77(1): 2257, 2257.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 2012b. Response to Office of Federal Register Petition (June 1, 2012). www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Final-ACUS-Response-to-OFR-Petition-6-1-12.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture, Marketing Branch. 2015. California Leafy Green Products Handler Marketing Agreement. www.cdfa.ca.gov/mkt/mkt/pdf/LeafyGreensProductsHandlerMktAgmt.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture, Marketing Branch. 2016. Commodity Specific Food Safety Guidelines for the Production and Harvest of Lettuce and Leafy Greens. www.lgma.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/California-LGMA-metrics-01-29-16-Final1.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Department of Human Services, Food and Drug Branch & U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2007. Investigation of and Escherichia coli O157:H7 Outbreak Associated with Dole Pre-Packaged Spinach. www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/docs/investigation_of_an_e_coli_outbreak_associated_with_dole_pre-packaged_spinach.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Marketing Act of 1937. 21 Cal. Food & Agric. Code §§ 58601–58624.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017. Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks, United States 2015. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 2004. Enterprise Open Standards Policy. www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/policies-legal-and-technical-guidance/it-policies-standards-and-procedures/ent-pols-and-stnds/Google Scholar
Copyright Office. 2013. Circular No. 14.0713, Copyright in Derivative Works and Compilations 1. www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture. 2002. Veneman Marks Implementation of USDA National Organic Standards (October 10, 2002).Google Scholar
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 2010. 124 Stat. 1376, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78.Google Scholar
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011. Pub. L. No. 111–353, 124 Stat. 3885.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2005. Statement in the Matter of Union Oil Company of California. Dkt. No. 9305.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2014. Made in USA Brand, LLC Agrees to Drop Deceptive Certification Claims. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/07/made-usa-brand-llc-agrees-drop-deceptive-certification-claimsGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1998. Guidance for Industry: Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM169112.pdfGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2004a. Letter to Firms that Grow, Pack, or Ship Fresh Lettuce and Fresh Tomatoes. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170404002726/www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ProducePlantProducts/ucm118896.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2004b. Produce Safety from Production to Consumption: 2004 Action Plan to Minimize Foodborne Illness Associated with Fresh Produce Consumption. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171103205748/www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/BuyStoreServeSafeFood/ucm129487.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2008. Guidance for Industry: Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables. www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ProducePlantProducts/ucm064458.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2013. Standards for Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding Produce for Human Consumption, Proposed Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 3504 (January 16, 2013).Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2014. Operational Strategy for Implementing the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm395105.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2015. Standards for Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding Produce for Human Consumption, Final Rule, 80 Fed. Reg. 74354 (November 27, 2015).Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2017. Standards for the Growing Harvesting, Packing, and Holding Produce for Human Consumption, Final Regulatory Impact Analysis. Archived at http://perma.cc/9U6F-M7RBGoogle Scholar
H.F. 3971, 84th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Minn. 2006).Google Scholar
H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476, at 124 (1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5659.Google Scholar
Madrid Protocol Implementation Act of 2002. Public Law 107–273, 116 Stat. 1758, 1913–1921.Google Scholar
Madrid Protocol to the 1891 Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement; adopted June 27, 1989, Madrid, Spain; amended on October 3, 2006 and November 12, 2007. 15 U.S.C. § 1141a(b).Google Scholar
Minnesota, State of. 2007. Preserving the Present: Creating, accessing and maintaining Minnesota’s electronic documents. https://mn.gov/mnit/images/gov_lr_2008_0115_Legislative_Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2012. Incorporation by Reference, 77 Fed. Reg. 11,414, 11,414 (February 27, 2012).Google Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2014. Incorporation by Reference, 79 Fed. Reg. 66,267, 66,267 (November 7, 2014).Google Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2017. IBR Handbook. www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/write/handbook/ibr.pdf/Google Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2018. Federal Register. www.federalregister.gov/Google Scholar
National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU). 1979. Final Report. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST). 2018. Standards Incorporated by Reference (SIBR) Database, Regulatory SIBR (P-SIBR) Statistics. https://standards.gov/sibr/query/index.cfm?fuseaction=rsibr.total_regulatory_sibrGoogle Scholar
National Library of Medicine (NLM). 2003. SNOMED Clinical Terms to Be Added to UMLS Metathesaurus. www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/snomed_announcement.htmlGoogle Scholar
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA). 2016. Pub. L. No. 104–113, 110 Stat. 775 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq.).Google Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board. 2011. NTSB/PAR-11/01, Pipeline Accident Report, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Rupture and Fire, San Bruno, California, September 9, 2010 (August 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 1998. “Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities.” Federal Register 63: 8546.Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2016. OMB Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities. www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/revised_circular_a-119_as_of_01-22-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office of the Federal Register (OFR). 2018a. Incorporation by Reference (IBR) Handbook. www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/write/handbook/ibr.pdf/Google Scholar
Office of the Federal Register (OFR). 2018b. Document Drafting Handbook. www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/write/handbook/ddh.pdfGoogle Scholar
Organic Foods Production Act of 1990. Pub. L. No. 101–624, 104 Stat. 3935 (codified as amended at 7 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6522).Google Scholar
Patent & Trademark Off. (PTO). 2018. The Madrid Protocol Frequently Asked Questions by U.S. Trademark Owners Seeking International Rights. www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/madrid/madridfaqs.jspGoogle Scholar
S. 1160, 89th Cong. 1965.Google Scholar
S. 1666, 88th Cong. 1964.Google Scholar
S. Rep. No. 1219. 1964.Google Scholar
S. Rep. No. 813. 1965.Google Scholar
S.B. 1579, 78th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Tex. 2003).Google Scholar
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 116 Stat. 745 (codified in Titles 15, 18, 28 and 29 U.S.C.).Google Scholar
Securities Act of 1933. 48 Stat. 74 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2010. Response of the Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Corporate Finance, Re: Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/2010/ford072210-1120.htmGoogle Scholar
Texas, State of. 2009. “Texas Senate Bill 266.” https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB266/2009Google Scholar
Trade Agreements Act of 1979. Pub.L. 96–39, 93 Stat. 144 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq.).Google Scholar
U.S. Const. amend. I.Google Scholar
White House. 1997. President Clinton Announces Initiative to Ensure the Safety of Imported and Domestic Fruits and Vegetables. https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/New/html/19971002-8886.htmlGoogle Scholar
Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ L 210, 7.8.1985, p. 29), as last amended by Directive 1999/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 141, 4 June 1999, p 20).Google Scholar
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.Google Scholar
Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information.Google Scholar
Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information Text with EEA relevance.Google Scholar
Directive No. 2015/2436, codified under EU Regulation No. 2015/2424 (European Trademark Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2015/1535/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services [2015] OJ L241/1.Google Scholar
EU Intellectual Prop. Office (EUIPO). 2017. Guidelines for Examination of European Union Trade Marks, Part B – Examination.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1985. Council Resolution (85/C 136/01) of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonization and standards – OJ C 136 of 4 June 1985.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1986. Decision 86/399 of 10 July 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (1986) OJ L 232 /15.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1992. COM(92) 445, Communication from the Commission, Intellectual Property Rights and Standardization.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2003. General Guidelines for the Cooperation between CEN, Cenelec and ETSI and the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association, 2003 O.J. (C 91).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2004. European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Docd552.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2008. Decision 768/2008 of 9 July 2008 on a Common Framework for the Marketing of Products OJ L 218 (13 August 2008).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011a. “Communication: A strategic vision for European standards: Moving forward to enhance and accelerate the sustainable growth of the European economy by 2020,” COM(2011) 311 final, 1 June 2011.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011b. Staff Working Paper, “Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment,” SEC (2011) 672 final, 1 et seq.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011c, “Communication: Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements,” Official Journal C11, 14.1.2011, p. 1.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012. Commission Regulation 1025/2012, On European Standardisation, 2012 O.J. (L 316).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. Patents and Standards: A modern framework for IPR-based standardization. A study prepared for the European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016a. “Communication: Standardisation package: European standards for the 21st century,” COM(2016) 358 final, 1 June 2016.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016b. About the European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/about/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2017. Publication of an update to the list of national standardisation bodies pursuant to Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European standardization, O.J. (C 351), p. 13–16.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2018. General framework of European standardisation policy. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/policy/framework_enGoogle Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of The Council of 25 October amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
Regulation 764/2008 of 9 July 2008 Laying down Procedures Relating to the Application of Certain National Technical Rules to Products Lawfully Marketed in Another Member State OJ L 218, 13 August 2013.Google Scholar
Regulation No 765/2008 of 9 July 2008 Setting Out the Requirements for Accreditation and Market Surveillance Relating to the Marketing of Products OJ L 218, 13 August 2008.Google Scholar
Décret No. 2009–697 of 16 June 2009 relatif à la normalisation.Google Scholar
Malaysian Public Sector Open Source Software (OSS) Initiative. 2006. The Malaysian Government Interoperability Framework for Open Source Software (MyGIFOSS).Google Scholar
State Services Commission, New Zealand. 2008. New Zealand E-government Interoperability Framework (NZ e-GIF). www.ict.govt.nz/assets/Guidance-and-Resources/eGIF-v3.3.pdfGoogle Scholar
India. 2008. Policy on Open Standards for E-Governance, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology Department of Information Technology. http://nisg.org/files/documents/A03020001.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India. 2010. Policy on Open Standards for e-Governance. www.gswan.gov.in/PDF/Policy%20on%20Open%20Standards%20in%20eGovernance.pdfGoogle Scholar
Commerce and Information Policy Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Government of Japan. 2005. Interim Report of “Study Group on the Legal Protection of Software and Promotion of Innovation” (Tentative Translation).Google Scholar
Office of the Government CIO-South Africa. 2007. Handbook on Minimum Information Interoperability Standards (MIOS). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/cpsi/unpan026787.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch [ZBG], Ordinance Governing the Use of the Appellation “Swiss” for Watches, Code Civil [CC], Codice civile [CC] [Civil Code] December 23, 1971, RO 1915 (Switz.).Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (GUK). 2012. Open Standards Principles: For software interoperability, data and document formats in government IT specifications. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140904135420/ www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78892/open-standards-principles-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office (GUK). 2014. Government Digital Service: Core Assessment Questions. www.gov.uk/government/organisations/government-digital-serviceGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office (GUK). 2015. Policy Paper: Open Standards Principles (UK). www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-standards-principles/open-standards-principlesGoogle Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2018. How to file your application: Basic Requirements. www.wipo.int/madrid/en/how_to/file/requirements.htmlGoogle Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 1993. World Trade Organization, Communication from the ISO/IEC, TBT/W/178, 15 December 1993.Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 1995. World Trade Organization, “Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade with Regard to Labelling Requirements, Voluntary Standards, and Processes and Production Methods Unrelated to Product Characteristics,” WT/TBT/W/11, 29 August 1995.Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 2000. World Trade Organization, “Decision of the Committee on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations with Relation to Articles 2, 5 and Annex 3 of the Agreement,” G/TBT/9 (13 November 2000).Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 2001. World Trade Organization, “Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Since 1 January 1995,” Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/1/Rev.10 (9 June 2001).Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 2016. World Trade Organization, “List of Standardizing Bodies that Have Accepted the Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards Since 1 January 1995,” G/TBT/CS/2/rev.22, 29 February 2016.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994a. Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299 (April 15, 1994).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994b. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994c. The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001. Appellate Body Report, EC – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2002a. Appellate Body Report, EC – Trade Description of Sardines.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2002b. Panel Report, EC – Trade Description of Sardines (2002b).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2008a. Appellate Body Report, China – Measures Affecting Imports of Automobile Parts.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2008b. Appellate Body Report, EC – Bananas III (Article 21.5 – Ecuador II).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2011a. Panel Report, United States – Certain Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Requirements.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2012a. Appellate Body Report, US – Certain Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Requirements.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2012b. Appellate Body Report, US – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), concluded on 23 May 1969.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 1979. “Recommendation 78-4, Federal Agency Interaction with Private Standard-Setting Organizations in Health and Safety Regulation.” Federal Register 44(4): 1357–1359.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 2011. “Recommendation 2011–5, Incorporation by Reference,” Federal Register 77(10): 2257–2259.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 2012a. “Recommendation 2011–5, Incorporation by Reference,” Federal Register. 77(1): 2257, 2257.Google Scholar
Admin. Conf. of the U.S. (ACUS). 2012b. Response to Office of Federal Register Petition (June 1, 2012). www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Final-ACUS-Response-to-OFR-Petition-6-1-12.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture, Marketing Branch. 2015. California Leafy Green Products Handler Marketing Agreement. www.cdfa.ca.gov/mkt/mkt/pdf/LeafyGreensProductsHandlerMktAgmt.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Department of Food and Agriculture, Marketing Branch. 2016. Commodity Specific Food Safety Guidelines for the Production and Harvest of Lettuce and Leafy Greens. www.lgma.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/California-LGMA-metrics-01-29-16-Final1.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Department of Human Services, Food and Drug Branch & U.S. Food and Drug Administration. 2007. Investigation of and Escherichia coli O157:H7 Outbreak Associated with Dole Pre-Packaged Spinach. www.cdc.gov/nceh/ehs/docs/investigation_of_an_e_coli_outbreak_associated_with_dole_pre-packaged_spinach.pdfGoogle Scholar
California Marketing Act of 1937. 21 Cal. Food & Agric. Code §§ 58601–58624.Google Scholar
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 2017. Surveillance for Foodborne Disease Outbreaks, United States 2015. Atlanta, Georgia: US Department of Health and Human Services.Google Scholar
Commonwealth of Massachusetts. 2004. Enterprise Open Standards Policy. www.mass.gov/anf/research-and-tech/policies-legal-and-technical-guidance/it-policies-standards-and-procedures/ent-pols-and-stnds/Google Scholar
Copyright Office. 2013. Circular No. 14.0713, Copyright in Derivative Works and Compilations 1. www.copyright.gov/circs/circ14.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Agriculture. 2002. Veneman Marks Implementation of USDA National Organic Standards (October 10, 2002).Google Scholar
Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. 2010. 124 Stat. 1376, codified at 15 U.S.C. § 78.Google Scholar
FDA Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011. Pub. L. No. 111–353, 124 Stat. 3885.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2005. Statement in the Matter of Union Oil Company of California. Dkt. No. 9305.Google Scholar
Federal Trade Commission (FTC). 2014. Made in USA Brand, LLC Agrees to Drop Deceptive Certification Claims. www.ftc.gov/news-events/press-releases/2014/07/made-usa-brand-llc-agrees-drop-deceptive-certification-claimsGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 1998. Guidance for Industry: Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards for Fresh Fruits and Vegetables. www.fda.gov/downloads/Food/GuidanceRegulation/UCM169112.pdfGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2004a. Letter to Firms that Grow, Pack, or Ship Fresh Lettuce and Fresh Tomatoes. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20170404002726/www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ProducePlantProducts/ucm118896.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2004b. Produce Safety from Production to Consumption: 2004 Action Plan to Minimize Foodborne Illness Associated with Fresh Produce Consumption. https://wayback.archive-it.org/7993/20171103205748/www.fda.gov/Food/FoodborneIllnessContaminants/BuyStoreServeSafeFood/ucm129487.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2008. Guidance for Industry: Guide to Minimize Microbial Food Safety Hazards of Fresh-cut Fruits and Vegetables. www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/GuidanceDocumentsRegulatoryInformation/ProducePlantProducts/ucm064458.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2013. Standards for Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding Produce for Human Consumption, Proposed Rule, 78 Fed. Reg. 3504 (January 16, 2013).Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2014. Operational Strategy for Implementing the FDA Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA). www.fda.gov/Food/GuidanceRegulation/FSMA/ucm395105.htmGoogle Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2015. Standards for Growing, Harvesting, Packing, and Holding Produce for Human Consumption, Final Rule, 80 Fed. Reg. 74354 (November 27, 2015).Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (FDA). 2017. Standards for the Growing Harvesting, Packing, and Holding Produce for Human Consumption, Final Regulatory Impact Analysis. Archived at http://perma.cc/9U6F-M7RBGoogle Scholar
H.F. 3971, 84th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Minn. 2006).Google Scholar
H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476, at 124 (1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. at 5659.Google Scholar
Madrid Protocol Implementation Act of 2002. Public Law 107–273, 116 Stat. 1758, 1913–1921.Google Scholar
Madrid Protocol to the 1891 Madrid Agreement Concerning the International Registration of Marks and the Protocol Relating to that Agreement; adopted June 27, 1989, Madrid, Spain; amended on October 3, 2006 and November 12, 2007. 15 U.S.C. § 1141a(b).Google Scholar
Minnesota, State of. 2007. Preserving the Present: Creating, accessing and maintaining Minnesota’s electronic documents. https://mn.gov/mnit/images/gov_lr_2008_0115_Legislative_Report.pdfGoogle Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2012. Incorporation by Reference, 77 Fed. Reg. 11,414, 11,414 (February 27, 2012).Google Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2014. Incorporation by Reference, 79 Fed. Reg. 66,267, 66,267 (November 7, 2014).Google Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2017. IBR Handbook. www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/write/handbook/ibr.pdf/Google Scholar
National Archives and Records Administration (NARA). 2018. Federal Register. www.federalregister.gov/Google Scholar
National Commission on New Technological Uses of Copyrighted Works (CONTU). 1979. Final Report. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.Google Scholar
National Institute of Standards & Technology (NIST). 2018. Standards Incorporated by Reference (SIBR) Database, Regulatory SIBR (P-SIBR) Statistics. https://standards.gov/sibr/query/index.cfm?fuseaction=rsibr.total_regulatory_sibrGoogle Scholar
National Library of Medicine (NLM). 2003. SNOMED Clinical Terms to Be Added to UMLS Metathesaurus. www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/Snomed/snomed_announcement.htmlGoogle Scholar
National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act of 1995 (NTTAA). 2016. Pub. L. No. 104–113, 110 Stat. 775 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq.).Google Scholar
National Transportation Safety Board. 2011. NTSB/PAR-11/01, Pipeline Accident Report, Pacific Gas and Electric Company Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Rupture and Fire, San Bruno, California, September 9, 2010 (August 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 1998. “Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities.” Federal Register 63: 8546.Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2016. OMB Circular A-119: Federal Participation in the Development and Use of Voluntary Consensus Standards and in Conformity Assessment Activities. www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/revised_circular_a-119_as_of_01-22-2016.pdfGoogle Scholar
Office of the Federal Register (OFR). 2018a. Incorporation by Reference (IBR) Handbook. www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/write/handbook/ibr.pdf/Google Scholar
Office of the Federal Register (OFR). 2018b. Document Drafting Handbook. www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/write/handbook/ddh.pdfGoogle Scholar
Organic Foods Production Act of 1990. Pub. L. No. 101–624, 104 Stat. 3935 (codified as amended at 7 U.S.C. §§ 6501–6522).Google Scholar
Patent & Trademark Off. (PTO). 2018. The Madrid Protocol Frequently Asked Questions by U.S. Trademark Owners Seeking International Rights. www.uspto.gov/trademarks/law/madrid/madridfaqs.jspGoogle Scholar
S. 1160, 89th Cong. 1965.Google Scholar
S. 1666, 88th Cong. 1964.Google Scholar
S. Rep. No. 1219. 1964.Google Scholar
S. Rep. No. 813. 1965.Google Scholar
S.B. 1579, 78th Leg., Reg. Sess. (Tex. 2003).Google Scholar
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. 116 Stat. 745 (codified in Titles 15, 18, 28 and 29 U.S.C.).Google Scholar
Securities Act of 1933. 48 Stat. 74 (codified at 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq.).Google Scholar
Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). 2010. Response of the Office of Chief Counsel, Division of Corporate Finance, Re: Ford Motor Credit Company LLC. www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/cf-noaction/2010/ford072210-1120.htmGoogle Scholar
Texas, State of. 2009. “Texas Senate Bill 266.” https://legiscan.com/TX/bill/SB266/2009Google Scholar
Trade Agreements Act of 1979. Pub.L. 96–39, 93 Stat. 144 (codified at 19 U.S.C. § 2501 et seq.).Google Scholar
U.S. Const. amend. I.Google Scholar
White House. 1997. President Clinton Announces Initiative to Ensure the Safety of Imported and Domestic Fruits and Vegetables. https://clintonwhitehouse4.archives.gov/WH/New/html/19971002-8886.htmlGoogle Scholar
Directive 85/374/EEC of 25 July 1985 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning liability for defective products (OJ L 210, 7.8.1985, p. 29), as last amended by Directive 1999/34/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 141, 4 June 1999, p 20).Google Scholar
Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society.Google Scholar
Directive 2003/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 November 2003 on the re-use of public sector information.Google Scholar
Directive 2013/37/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 amending Directive 2003/98/EC on the re-use of public sector information Text with EEA relevance.Google Scholar
Directive No. 2015/2436, codified under EU Regulation No. 2015/2424 (European Trademark Directive).Google Scholar
Directive 2015/1535/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 September 2015 laying down a procedure for the provision of information in the field of technical regulations and of rules on Information Society services [2015] OJ L241/1.Google Scholar
EU Intellectual Prop. Office (EUIPO). 2017. Guidelines for Examination of European Union Trade Marks, Part B – Examination.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1985. Council Resolution (85/C 136/01) of 7 May 1985 on a new approach to technical harmonization and standards – OJ C 136 of 4 June 1985.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1986. Decision 86/399 of 10 July 1986 relating to a proceeding under Article 85 of the EEC Treaty (1986) OJ L 232 /15.Google Scholar
European Commission. 1992. COM(92) 445, Communication from the Commission, Intellectual Property Rights and Standardization.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2003. General Guidelines for the Cooperation between CEN, Cenelec and ETSI and the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association, 2003 O.J. (C 91).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2004. European Interoperability Framework for Pan-European eGovernment Services. http://ec.europa.eu/idabc/servlets/Docd552.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2008. Decision 768/2008 of 9 July 2008 on a Common Framework for the Marketing of Products OJ L 218 (13 August 2008).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011a. “Communication: A strategic vision for European standards: Moving forward to enhance and accelerate the sustainable growth of the European economy by 2020,” COM(2011) 311 final, 1 June 2011.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011b. Staff Working Paper, “Executive Summary of the Impact Assessment,” SEC (2011) 672 final, 1 et seq.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011c, “Communication: Guidelines on the applicability of Article 101 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union to horizontal co-operation agreements,” Official Journal C11, 14.1.2011, p. 1.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2012. Commission Regulation 1025/2012, On European Standardisation, 2012 O.J. (L 316).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. Patents and Standards: A modern framework for IPR-based standardization. A study prepared for the European Commission.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016a. “Communication: Standardisation package: European standards for the 21st century,” COM(2016) 358 final, 1 June 2016.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2016b. About the European Commission. http://ec.europa.eu/about/index_en.htmGoogle Scholar
European Commission. 2017. Publication of an update to the list of national standardisation bodies pursuant to Article 27 of Regulation (EU) No 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council on European standardization, O.J. (C 351), p. 13–16.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2018. General framework of European standardisation policy. https://ec.europa.eu/growth/single-market/european-standards/policy/framework_enGoogle Scholar
Regulation (EU) No. 1025/2012 of the European Parliament and of The Council of 25 October amending Council Directives 89/686/EEC and 93/15/EEC and Directives 94/9/EC, 94/25/EC, 95/16/EC, 97/23/EC, 98/34/EC, 2004/22/EC, 2007/23/EC, 2009/23/EC and 2009/105/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Council Decision 87/95/EEC and Decision No 1673/2006/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council.Google Scholar
Regulation 764/2008 of 9 July 2008 Laying down Procedures Relating to the Application of Certain National Technical Rules to Products Lawfully Marketed in Another Member State OJ L 218, 13 August 2013.Google Scholar
Regulation No 765/2008 of 9 July 2008 Setting Out the Requirements for Accreditation and Market Surveillance Relating to the Marketing of Products OJ L 218, 13 August 2008.Google Scholar
Décret No. 2009–697 of 16 June 2009 relatif à la normalisation.Google Scholar
Malaysian Public Sector Open Source Software (OSS) Initiative. 2006. The Malaysian Government Interoperability Framework for Open Source Software (MyGIFOSS).Google Scholar
State Services Commission, New Zealand. 2008. New Zealand E-government Interoperability Framework (NZ e-GIF). www.ict.govt.nz/assets/Guidance-and-Resources/eGIF-v3.3.pdfGoogle Scholar
India. 2008. Policy on Open Standards for E-Governance, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology Department of Information Technology. http://nisg.org/files/documents/A03020001.pdfGoogle Scholar
Department of Information Technology, Ministry of Communications & Information Technology, Government of India. 2010. Policy on Open Standards for e-Governance. www.gswan.gov.in/PDF/Policy%20on%20Open%20Standards%20in%20eGovernance.pdfGoogle Scholar
Commerce and Information Policy Bureau, Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, Government of Japan. 2005. Interim Report of “Study Group on the Legal Protection of Software and Promotion of Innovation” (Tentative Translation).Google Scholar
Office of the Government CIO-South Africa. 2007. Handbook on Minimum Information Interoperability Standards (MIOS). http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/cpsi/unpan026787.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schweizerisches Zivilgesetzbuch [ZBG], Ordinance Governing the Use of the Appellation “Swiss” for Watches, Code Civil [CC], Codice civile [CC] [Civil Code] December 23, 1971, RO 1915 (Switz.).Google Scholar
Cabinet Office (GUK). 2012. Open Standards Principles: For software interoperability, data and document formats in government IT specifications. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140904135420/ www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/78892/open-standards-principles-final.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office (GUK). 2014. Government Digital Service: Core Assessment Questions. www.gov.uk/government/organisations/government-digital-serviceGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office (GUK). 2015. Policy Paper: Open Standards Principles (UK). www.gov.uk/government/publications/open-standards-principles/open-standards-principlesGoogle Scholar
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO). 2018. How to file your application: Basic Requirements. www.wipo.int/madrid/en/how_to/file/requirements.htmlGoogle Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 1993. World Trade Organization, Communication from the ISO/IEC, TBT/W/178, 15 December 1993.Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 1995. World Trade Organization, “Negotiating History of the Coverage of the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade with Regard to Labelling Requirements, Voluntary Standards, and Processes and Production Methods Unrelated to Product Characteristics,” WT/TBT/W/11, 29 August 1995.Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 2000. World Trade Organization, “Decision of the Committee on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations with Relation to Articles 2, 5 and Annex 3 of the Agreement,” G/TBT/9 (13 November 2000).Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 2001. World Trade Organization, “Decisions and Recommendations Adopted by the WTO Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Since 1 January 1995,” Note by the Secretariat, G/TBT/1/Rev.10 (9 June 2001).Google Scholar
Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Committee). 2016. World Trade Organization, “List of Standardizing Bodies that Have Accepted the Code of Good Practice for the Preparation, Adoption and Application of Standards Since 1 January 1995,” G/TBT/CS/2/rev.22, 29 February 2016.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994a. Agreement on Trade Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, 1869 U.N.T.S. 299 (April 15, 1994).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994b. Marrakesh Agreement Establishing the World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 1994c. The WTO Agreement on the Application of Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures (SPS Agreement).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2001. Appellate Body Report, EC – Measures Affecting Asbestos and Products Containing Asbestos.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2002a. Appellate Body Report, EC – Trade Description of Sardines.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2002b. Panel Report, EC – Trade Description of Sardines (2002b).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2008a. Appellate Body Report, China – Measures Affecting Imports of Automobile Parts.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2008b. Appellate Body Report, EC – Bananas III (Article 21.5 – Ecuador II).Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2011a. Panel Report, United States – Certain Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Requirements.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2012a. Appellate Body Report, US – Certain Country of Origin Labeling (COOL) Requirements.Google Scholar
World Trade Organization (WTO). 2012b. Appellate Body Report, US – Measures Affecting the Production and Sale of Clove Cigarettes.Google Scholar
Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (VCLT), concluded on 23 May 1969.Google Scholar
AFNOR. 2018. Terms and Condition of Sale (available in English). www.boutique.afnor.org/resources/c98c56a0-e973-4790-aca2-17f3f8417b4c.pdfGoogle Scholar
Alliance for Internet of Things Innovation (AIOTI). 2016. IoT LSP Standard Framework Concepts. Release 2.6. https://docbox.etsi.org/SmartM2M/Open/AIOTI/!!20160530Deliverables/AIOTI%20WG3_sdos_alliances_landscape_-_iot_lsp_standard_framework_concepts_-_release_2_v6.pdfGoogle Scholar
AllSeen Alliance. 2017. IP Policy. https://web.archive.org/web/20171125000858/https://identity.allseenalliance.org/about/governance/ip-policyGoogle Scholar
American Medical Association. 2017. CPT Purpose and Mission. www.ama-assn.org/practice-management/cpt-purpose-missionGoogle Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2008. ANSI Guidelines on Embedded Trademark.Google Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018a. ANSI Essential Requirements: Due Process Requirements for American National Standards. www.ansi.org/essentialrequirements/Google Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018b. Domestic Programs (American National Standards) Overview. www.ansi.org/standards_activities/domestic_programs/overview?menuid=3Google Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018c. IBR Standards Portal: Standards Incorporated by Reference. https://ibr.ansi.org/Google Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018d. Introduction to ANSI. www.ansi.org/about_ansi/introduction/introductionGoogle Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018e. ISO Programs Overview. www.ansi.org/standards_activities/iso_programs/overviewGoogle Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018f. Overview of the U.S. Standardization System. www.standardsportal.org/usa_en/standards_system.aspxGoogle Scholar
American National Standards Institute (ANSI). 2018g. Why Charge for Standards? www.ansi.org/help/charge_standards.aspxGoogle Scholar
American Petroleum Institute. 2018. Publications, Programs, Services. www.api.org/~/media/Files/Publications/2018_Catalog/2018_Pubs_Catalog_final_sm.pdfGoogle Scholar
Apache Software Foundation. 2018. Software Grant and Corporate Contributor License Agreement. www.apache.org/licenses/cla-corporate.txtGoogle Scholar
ASTM International. 2018a. Benefit-Cost Analysis of Committee F37 on Light Sport Aircraft to the Light Sport Aircraft Community and the FAA. www.astm.org/COMMIT/LSA_Case_Study.pdfGoogle Scholar
ASTM International. 2018b. Committee F37 on Light Sport Aircraft. www.astm.org/COMMITTEE/F37.htmGoogle Scholar
ASTM International. 2018d. Standards Products, www.astm.org/Standard/index.html (last accessed June 15, 2018).Google Scholar
ASTM International. 2018e. Subcommittee F37.10 on Glider. www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/F3710.htmGoogle Scholar
ASTM International. 2018f. Subcommittee F37.70 on Cross Cutting. www.astm.org/COMMIT/SUBCOMMIT/F3770.htmGoogle Scholar
Black Duck Software. 2018. Top Open Source Licenses. www.blackducksoftware.com/top-open-source-licensesGoogle Scholar
Bluetooth SIG. 2008. Thousands of Products Infringing on Bluetooth Trademark Seized. www.bluetooth.com/news/pressreleases/2008/12/15/thousands-of-products-infringing-on-bluetooth-trademarks-seizedGoogle Scholar
Bluetooth SIG. 2016. Bluetooth Trademark License Agreement (E-Sign Version 1.3 – Last Revised December 14, 2016).Google Scholar
Bluetooth SIG. 2018a. Qualification Fees. www.bluetooth.com/develop-with-bluetooth/qualification-listing/qualification-listing-feesGoogle Scholar
Bluetooth SIG. 2018b. Qualification Test Facilities. www.bluetooth.com/develop-with-bluetooth/qualification-listing/qualification-test-facilitiesGoogle Scholar
BSI. 2017. Rules for the Structure and Drafting of UK standards. www.bsigroup.com/Documents/standards/guide-to-standards/Rules-for-structure-and-drafting-of-UK-standards-2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
CEN/CENELEC. 2018a. European Standardization. www.cencenelec.eu/standards/Pages/default.aspxGoogle Scholar
CENELEC. 2015. Articles of Association. ftp://ftp.cencenelec.eu/CENELEC/ArticlesOfAssociation/1_CLCArticlesOfAssociation2015_EN.pdfGoogle Scholar
Classification & Rating Administration (CARA). 2010. Classification and Rating Rules. www.filmratings.com/downloads/rating_rules.pdfGoogle Scholar
DIN. 2013. DIN 820–1. Normungsarbeit – Teil 1: Grundsätze. www.din.de/de/ueber-normen-und-standards/din-norm/grundsaetzeGoogle Scholar
DVB Services Sárl. 2018. DVB Trademark Authorised User Agreement. www.dvbservices.com/dvb_logo/agreement/Google Scholar
ECMA International. 2011. ECMAScript® Language Specification. www.ecma-international.org/ecma-262/5.1/Google Scholar
ECMA International. 2016. ECMA Code of Conduct in Patent Matters. Version 2. www.ecma-international.org/memento/codeofconduct.htmGoogle Scholar
ECMA International. 2018. ECMA List of Patent Statements. www.ecma-international.org/publications/files/ECMA-ST/Ecma%20PATENT/EcmaListofPatentStatements.htmGoogle Scholar
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 2005. Open Source impacts on ICT standardization. www.etsi.org/website/document/workshop/sosinterop/sosinteropiiibackground01.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 2016a. ETSI Rules of Procedure Annex 6: ETSI Intellectual Property Rights Policy. www.etsi.org/images/files/IPR/etsi-ipr-policy.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 2016b. Terms of Reference of the Open Source Group on ‘Open Source MANO’ (OSG OSM). https://portal.etsi.org/Portals/0/TBpages/OSM/Docs/ETSI_OSG_OSM_ToR_2016-02-09.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 2017a. ETSI IPR Policy. www.etsi.org/images/files/IPR/etsi-ipr-policy.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI). 2017b. Statutes https://portal.etsi.org/directives/37_directives_apr_2017.pdfGoogle Scholar
European Committee for Interoperable Systems (ECIS). 2012. ECIS patent consultation contribution. http://ec.europa.eu/internal_market/indprop/docs/patent/hearing/vinje_ecis_en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Food Industry Center & National Center for Food Protection and Defense. 2009. Natural Selection: 2006 E. coli Recall of Fresh Spinach. http://ageconsearch.umn.edu/bitstream/54784/2/Natural%20Selection.pdfGoogle Scholar
Free Software Foundation (FSF). 2017. What is free software? www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.htmlGoogle Scholar
Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). 2016a. EU jeopardises its own goals in standardisation with FRAND licensing. https://fsfe.org/news/2016/news-20160428-02.en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). 2016b. Why is FRAND bad for Free Software? https://fsfe.org/activities/os/why-frand-is-bad-for-free-software.en.html#fn1Google Scholar
Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE). 2018. Transcript of Richard Stallman at the 2nd international GPLv3 conference; April 21, 2006. https://fsfe.org/campaigns/gplv3/fisl-rms-transcript.en.htmlGoogle Scholar
GNU. 2017. GNU General Public License, version 2. www.gnu.org/licenses/old-licenses/gpl-2.0.en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Good Housekeeping. 2014. About the GH Limited Warranty Seal. www.goodhousekeeping.com/institute/about-the-institute/a22148/about-good-housekeeping-sealGoogle Scholar
IBM. 2005. IBM Statement of Non-Assertion of Named Patents Against OSS. www.ibm.com/ibm/licensing/Patents/pledgedPatents.pdfGoogle Scholar
Idaho Potato Commission. 2018. Ask Dr. Potato: Top 5 Frequently Asked Questions. www.idahopotato.com/frequently-asked-questionsGoogle Scholar
IETF Trust. 1996. The Internet Standards Process – Revision 3. https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2026Google Scholar
IETF Trust. 2015. IETF TRUST Legal Provisions Relating to IETF Documents. https://trustee.ietf.org/documents/IETF-TLP-5_001.htmlGoogle Scholar
IETF Trust. 2016. IETF Trends and Observations. www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-arkko-ietf-trends-and-observations-00.txtGoogle Scholar
IETF Trust. 2017. Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology. www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc8179.txtGoogle Scholar
IETF Trust. 2018a. Trademark Usage Guidelines. https://trustee.ietf.org/trademark-usage-guidelines.html.Google Scholar
IETF Trust. 2018b. General Trademark License Agreement. https://trustee.ietf.org/docs/IETF_General_TM_License.pdfGoogle Scholar
IETF Trust. 2018c. FAQ for use of the IETF Acronym and Logo. https://trustee.ietf.org/ietf-logo-acronym.htmlGoogle Scholar
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 1990. IEEE Standard Computer Dictionary: A Compilation of IEEE Standard Computer Glossaries 114.Google Scholar
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2013. IEEE Policies. www.ieee.org/documents/ieee_policies.pdfGoogle Scholar
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2014. IEEE-SA Standards Board Patent Committee, IEEE-SA Patent Policy: Draft Comments ID No. 38. http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/pp-dialog/drafts_comments/PatCom_sort_by_commentID_040314.pdfGoogle Scholar
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2017. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws: Clause 6. http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.htmlGoogle Scholar
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE). 2018. IEEE-SA Standards Board Bylaws. http://standards.ieee.org/develop/policies/bylaws/sect6-7.htmlGoogle Scholar
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). 2018. Patent Database. http://patents.iec.ch/iec/pa.nsf/pa_h.xsp?v=0#Google Scholar
International Fresh-cut Produce Association & Western Growers Association. 1997. Voluntary Food Safety Guidelines for Fresh Produce. Alexandria, VA: International Fresh-cut Produce Association.Google Scholar
International Fresh-cut Produce Association, Produce Marketing Association, United Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Association, and Western Growers. 2006. Commodity Specific Food Safety Guidelines for the Lettuce and Leafy Greens Supply Chain. Alexandria, VA: International Fresh-cut Produce Association.Google Scholar
International Standardization Organization (ISO). 2012. ISO/IEC 23360–1:2006. www.iso.org/standard/43781.htmlGoogle Scholar
International Standardization Organization (ISO). 2018a. ISO Members. www.iso.org/iso/home/about/iso_members.htmGoogle Scholar
International Standardization Organization (ISO). 2018b. ISO Name and logo. www.iso.org/iso-name-and-logo.htmlGoogle Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). 2016. Definition of “Open Standards.” www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/ipr/Pages/open.aspx (last accessed October 21, 2016).Google Scholar
International Telecommunication Union (ITU). 2018. Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC. www.itu.int/en/ITU-T/ipr/Pages/policy.aspxGoogle Scholar
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). 2008. RFC 5378 – Rights Contributors Provide to the IETF Trust (Scott Bradner & Jorge Contreras eds., November 2008). http://tools.ietf.org/pdf/rfc5378.pdfGoogle Scholar
ISEAL Alliance, ISEAL Code of Good Practice – Setting Social and Environmental Standards v5.0, 2010.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC 17000:2004 – Conformity Assessment.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC Directives (ISO/IEC Dir 1), Part 1, Edition 10.0, 2013-10, clause 2.5.6.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC Guide 2: 2004.Google Scholar
ISO/IEC. 2017. ISO/IEC 17011:2017 Conformity Assessment – Requirements for Accreditation Bodies Accrediting Conformity Assessment Bodies. www.iso.org/standard/67198.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kroah-Harthman, Greg, Mason, Chris, van Riel, Rik, Kahn, Shuah, and Likely, Grant. 2017. Linux Kernel Community Enforcement Statement. http://kroah.com/log/blog/2017/10/16/linux-kernel-community-enforcement-statementGoogle Scholar
Motion Picture Association of America, Inc. (MPAA) & National Association of Theatre Owners, Inc. (NATO). January 1, 2010. Classification and Rating Rules. https://filmratings.com/Content/Downloads/rating_rules.pdfGoogle Scholar
Moving Picture Experts Group (MPEG). 2018. MXM License. https://mpeg.chiariglione.org/docs/mxm-licenseGoogle Scholar
National Fire Protection Association. 2018. NFPA 220: Standard on Types of Building Construction. https://catalog.nfpa.org/NFPA-220-Standard-on-Types-of-Building-Construction-P1239.aspx?icid=D729Google Scholar
NEN. 2005. Statuten en Huishoudelijk Reglement. www.nen.nl/web/file?uuid=088db660-6abe-47ec-b0aa-03e4ca3eeb78&owner=ffb94002-6f6e-4bdf-98ad-d18724cf33ceGoogle Scholar
NEN. 2016. Algemene Verkoopvoorwaarden Diensten Normontwikkeling. www.nen.nl/Home/Algemene-voorwaarden-2.htmGoogle Scholar
Netfilter. 2016. Statement of Netfilter Project on GPL Enforcement. www.netfilter.org/files/statement.pdfGoogle Scholar
Netscape. 1995. Netscape and Sun Announce Javascript, The Open, Cross-Platform Object Scripting Language for Enterprise Networds and the Internet. https://web.archive.org/web/20070916144913/http://wp.netscape.com/newsref/pr/newsrelease67.htmlGoogle Scholar
OASIS. 2006. Open by Design: The Advantages of the OpenDocument Format (ODF). www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/21449/oasis_odf_advantages_10dec2006.odtGoogle Scholar
OASIS. 2015. Open Standards, Cover Pages. http://xml.coverpages.org/openStandards.html (last updated September 27, 2015).Google Scholar
OASIS. 2018a. Open Repositories. www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/open-repositoriesGoogle Scholar
OASIS. 2018b. Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Policy. www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/iprGoogle Scholar
OMA SpecWorks. 2016. Open Standards and Open Sources. www.omaspecworks.org/open-standards-and-open-source/Google Scholar
Open Connectivity Foundation. 2016. Unification Will Combine the Best of Both Organizations under Open Connectivity Foundation Name and Bylaws. https://openconnectivity.org/announcements/allseen-alliance-merges-open-connectivity-foundation-accelerate-internet-thingsGoogle Scholar
Open Invention Network. 2012. OIN License Agreement. www.openinventionnetwork.com/joining-oin/oin-license-agreement/Google Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2017a. The Open Source Definition. https://opensource.org/osdGoogle Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2017b. The BSD 2-Clause License. https://opensource.org/licenses/bsd-license.phpGoogle Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2017c. Fall 2017 Face to Face Meeting Minutes. https://opensource.org/minutes2017FallF2FGoogle Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2017d. For Approval: W3C Software and Document License. http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2017-August/003081.htmlGoogle Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2018a. The Open Source Definition (Annotated). Version 1.9. https://opensource.org/osd-annotatedGoogle Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2018b. Licenses by Name. https://opensource.org/licenses/alphabeticalGoogle Scholar
Open Source Initiative (OSI). 2018d. April 2009 Archives by thread. http://lists.opensource.org/pipermail/license-review_lists.opensource.org/2009-April/thread.html#723Google Scholar
Oracle Corp. 2016. Java Licensing Logo Guidelines. www.oracle.com/us/technologies/java/java-licensing-logo-guidelines-1908204.pdfGoogle Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). 2010. Efficient e-Government for Smarter Public Service Delivery, Denmark.Google Scholar
Orthodox Union. 2018. Basics of Certification. https://oukosher.org/kosher-overview/how-does-ou-kosher-certification-workGoogle Scholar
Public.Resource.Org. (n.d.) https://public.resource.org/Google Scholar
Plastics Pipe Institute. 2018. All PPI Publications. http://plasticpipe.org/publications/index.htmlGoogle Scholar
Redhat. 2017. Technology Industry Leaders Join Forces to Increase Predictability in Open Source Licensing. www.redhat.com/en/about/press-releases/technology-industry-leaders-join-forces-increase-predictability-open-source-licensingGoogle Scholar
Software Freedom Conservancy (SFConservancy). 2018. The Principles of Community-Oriented GPL Enforcement. https://sfconservancy.org/copyleft-compliance/principles.htmlGoogle Scholar
Underwriters Laboratories (UL). 2017. UL Standards. https://ulstandards.ul.com (last accessed December 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Underwriters Laboratories (UL). 2018b. Standards Catalog. https://standardscatalog.ul.comGoogle Scholar
United Fresh Fruit & Vegetable Association, 1997. Industrywide Guidance to Minimize Microbiological Food Safety Risks for Produce. Archived at https://perma.cc/4FLG-YTGMGoogle Scholar
Western Growers Association. 2010. About the Process – Nine Things You Need to Know. www.leafygreenguidance.com/node/118Google Scholar
Wi-Fi Alliance (WFA). 2018a. Authorized Test Laboratories, www.wi-fi.org/certification/authorized-test-laboratoriesGoogle Scholar
Wi-Fi Alliance (WFA). 2018b. Wi-Fi Test Suite, www.wi-fi.org/certification/wi-fi-test-suiteGoogle Scholar
World Economic Forum (WEF). 2012. The Global Enabling Trade Report 2012 – Reducing Supply Chain Barriers.Google Scholar
Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C). 2004a. W3C Patent Policy. www.w3.org/Consortium/Patent-Policy-20040205/Google Scholar
Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C). 2004b. Overview and Summary of W3C Patent Policy. www.w3.org/2004/02/05-patentsummary.htmlGoogle Scholar
Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C). 2015. W3C Software and Document Notice and License. www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2015/copyright-software-and-documentGoogle Scholar
Worldwide Web Consortium (W3C). 2018. W3C Trademarks and Generic Terms. www.w3.org/Consortium/Legal/2002/trademarks-20021231Google Scholar
4iP Council. 2016. “The European Commission and the value of patents for 5G and IoT,” April 26, 2016.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2001. “International ‘Standards’ and International Governance,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(3): 345.Google Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan. 2009. “The Governance Triangle: Regulatory Standards Institutions and the Shadow of the State” in Mattli, W. and Woods, N., eds., The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, Daron, Gancia, Gino, and Zilibotti, Fabrizio. 2012. “Competing engines of growth: Innovation and standardization,” Journal of Economic Theory 147: 570.Google Scholar
Akerlof, George A. 1970. “The Market for ‘Lemons’: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3): 488–500.Google Scholar
Albano, Gian Luigi and Lizzeri, Alessandro. 2001. “Strategic Certification and Provision of Quality,” International Economic Review 42(1): 267–83.Google Scholar
Albersmeier, Friederike, Holger Schulze, Gabriele Jahn, and Achim Spiller. 2009. “The reliability of third-party certification in the food chain: From checklists to risk-oriented auditing,” Food Control 20: 927–35.Google Scholar
Amicus Curiae. Brief Amicus Curiae of Copyright Law Professors in Support of Respondent. 1995. Reprinted as “Brief Amicus Curiae of Copyright Law Professors in Lotus Development Corp. v. Borland International, Inc.” Journal of Intellectual Property Law 3(1): 103–34 (“Amicus Brief in Borland – U.S. Supreme Court”).Google Scholar
Amicus Curiae. Brief Amicus Curiae of Copyright Law Professors. 1994. Reprinted as “The Nature of Copyright Analysis for Computer Programs: Copyright Law Professors’ Brief Amicus Curiae in Lotus v. Borland” in Hastings Communications and Entertainment Law Journal 16(4): 657–80 (“Amicus Brief in Borland – 1st Circuit”).Google Scholar
Amit, Hagai. 2014. “The Incredibly High Cost of Keeping Your Food Kosher,” Haaretz, February 21, 2014.Google Scholar
An, Baisheng. 2009. “Intellectual Property Rights in Information and Communications Technology Standardization: High-Profile Disputes and Potential for Collaboration Between the United States and China,” Texas International Law Journal 45: 175.Google Scholar
Appleton, Arthur. 2005. “The Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade” in Macrory, P., Appleton, A., and Plummer, M., eds., The World Trade Organization: Legal, Economic and Political Analysis. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff, p. 371.Google Scholar
Armour, Stephanie. 2017. “Hospital Watchdog Gives Seal of Approval, Even After Problems Emerge,” Wall Street Journal. September 8.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Timothy K. 2010. “Shrinking the Commons: Termination of Copyright Licenses and Transfers for the Benefit of the Public,” Harvard Journal on Legislation. 47: 359.Google Scholar
Arthur, W. Brian. 1989. “Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-in by Historical Events,” Economic Journal. 99: 116.Google Scholar
Austin, Marc T. and Milner, Helen V.. 2001. “Strategies of European Standardization,” Journal of European Public Policy 8: 411, 423.Google Scholar
Bach, Susan and Pascal, Delaquis. Milner. 2009. “The Origin and Spread of Human Pathogens in Fruit Production Systems.” In Fan, Xuetong, Brenda A. Niemira, Christopher J. Doona, Florence E. Feeherry, and Robert B. Gravani, eds., Microbial Safety of Fresh Produce. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Barnett, Jonathan M. 2006. “Certification Drag: The Opinion Puzzle and Other Transactional Curiosities,” Journal of Corporation Law 33: 95–150.Google Scholar
Barnett, Jonathan M. 2012. “Intermediaries Revisited: Is Efficient Certification Consistent with Profit Maximization?,” Journal of Corporate Law 37(3): 475–527.Google Scholar
Baron, Justus and Spulber, Daniel F.. 2018. “Technology Standards and Standard Setting Organizations: Introduction to the Searle Center Database,” Northwestern Law & Econ Research Paper No. 17-16, https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3073165Google Scholar
Baron, Justus and Schmidt, Julia. 2017. “Technological Standardization, Endogenous Productivity and Transitory Dynamics.” Working Paper.Google Scholar
Baron, Justus and Pohlmann, Tim. 2013. “Who cooperates in standards consortia – rivals or complementors?,” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 9(4): 905–29.Google Scholar
Baron, Justus, Pohlmann, Tim, and Blind, Knut. 2016. “Essential patents and standards dynamics,” Research Policy 45: 1762–73.Google Scholar
Barritt, Keith. 2009. Copyright Ownership of Voluntary Consensus Standards, Fish & Richardson (August 13, 2009), www.fr.com/Copyright-Ownership-of-Voluntary-Consensus-Standards/Google Scholar
Barron, Mark R. 2007. “Creating Consumer Confidence or Confusion: The Role of Product Certification Marks in the Market Today,” Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review 11(2): 414–42.Google Scholar
Bartley, Tim. 2011. “Certification as Mode of Social Regulation” in Levi-Faur, D., ed., Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bebchuk, Lucian Arye and Kahan, Marcel. 1989. “Fairness Opinions: How Fair Are They and What Can Be Done About It?,” Duke Law Journal 27(1): 27–53.Google Scholar
Becker, Bo and Milbourn, Todd. 2010. “How did increased competition affect credit ratings?,” National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 16404. September.Google Scholar
Beebe, Barton. 2004. “The Semiotic Analysis of Trademark Law,” UCLA Law Review 51(3): 621–704.Google Scholar
Bekkers, Rudi and Updegrove, Andrew. 2012. “A Study of IPR Policies and Practices of a Representative Group of Standard Setting Organizations Worldwide.” Presented at National Academies of Science Symposium on Management of IP in Standards-Setting Processes. http://sites.nationalacademies.org/xpedio/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_072197.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bekkers, Rudi, Catalini, Christian, Martinelli, Arianna, Righi, Cesare, and Simcoe, Tim. 2016. “Essential patents and standard dynamics,” Research Policy 45(9): 1762–73.Google Scholar
Belenzon, Sharon and Schankerman, Mark. 2008. “Motivation and Sorting in Open Source Software Innovation,” LSE STICERD Research Paper No. EI47. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1401776Google Scholar
Belson, Jeffrey. 2017. Certification and Collective Marks. Law and Practice. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Bennett, Victor Manuel, Lamar Pierce, Jason A. Snyder, and Michael W. Toffel. 2013. “Customer-Driven Misconduct: How Competition Corrupts Business Practices,” Management Science 59(8): 1725–42.Google Scholar
Berkman Center for Internet & Society. 2005. Roadmap for Open ICT Ecosystems. https://cyber.harvard.edu/publications/2005/The_Roadmap_for_Open_ICT_EcosystemsGoogle Scholar
Berners-Lee, Tim and Bratt, Steven R.. 2003. Email to Dr. Oliver Smoot, President, International Organization for Standardization, September 18, 2003. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-international/2003JulSep/0213.htmlGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, Steven and Cashore, Benjamin. 2007. “Can non-state global governance be legitimate? An analytical framework,” Regulation and Governance 1: 347–71.Google Scholar
Biddle, Brad, Curci, Frank, Dodson, Matt, and Edwards, Molly. 2017. “Standards Setting Organizations and Trademark Registration: An Empirical Analysis” (working paper October 18, 2017).Google Scholar
Biglaiser, Gary and Friedman, James W.. 1994. “Middlemen as guarantors of quality,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 12(4): 509–31.Google Scholar
Black, J. 2009. “Legitimacy, Accountability and Polycentric Regulation: Dilemmas, Trilemmas and Organisational Response.” In Peters, A., Koechlin, L., Förster, T., and Zinkernagel, G. Fenner, eds., Non-State Actors as Standard Setters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 241.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut. 2006. “Explanatory Factors for Participation in Formal Standardization Processes: Empirical Evidence at Firm Level,” Economics of Innovation and Technology 15(2): 157–70.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut. 2009. “Standardisation as a Catalyst for Innovation,” ERIM Report Series Reference No. EIA-2009-LIS.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut. 2017. “The economic functions of standards in the innovation process.” In Hawkins, Richard, Blind, Knut, and Page, Robert, eds., Handbook of Innovation and Standards. London: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut and Jungmittag, A.. 2008. “The Impact of Patents and Standards on Macroeconomic Growth: A Panel Approach Covering Four Countries and 12 Sectors,” Journal of Productivity Analysis 29: 51.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut and Kahin, Brian. 2018. “Standards and the Global Economy,” in Contreras, J, ed., The Cambridge Handbook of Technical Standardization Law: Competition, Antitrust, and Patents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 7–16.Google Scholar
Blind, Knut and Mangelsdorf, Axel. 2006. “Motives to Standardize: Empirical Evidence from Germany,” Technovation 48–49: 13–24.Google Scholar
Bone, Robert G. 2006. “Hunting Goodwill: A History of the Concept of Goodwill in Trademark Law,” Boston University Law Review 86(3): 547–622.Google Scholar
Bowker, Geoffrey C. and Leigh Star, Susan. 2000. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boyle, Alan and Chinkin, Christine. 2007. The Making of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bradner, Scott. 1996. “The Internet standards process – Revision 3” (October), Request for Comments (RFC) 2026, www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2026.txtGoogle Scholar
Breitenberg, Maureen A. 2009. “NISTIR 7614, The ABC’s of Standards Activities.” www.nist.gov/sites/default/files/nistir_7614.pdfGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Emily. 2011. “Incorporation by Reference in Federal Regulations,” Administrative Conference of the United States.Google Scholar
Bremer, Emily. 2013a. “Incorporation by Reference in an Open-Government Age,” Harvard Journal of Law & Policy 36(1): 131–210.Google Scholar
Bremer, Emily. 2013b. “Technical Standards Meet Administrative Law: A Primer on an Ongoing Debate,” Standards Engineering 65(2): 1–6.Google Scholar
Bremer, Emily. 2015. “On the Cost of Private Standards in Public Law,” Kansas Law Review 63(2): 279–333.Google Scholar
Bremer, Emily. 2016. “American and European Perspectives on Private Standards in Public Law,” Tulane Law Review 91(2): 325–70.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jeffrey W. and Cuomo, Paul C.. 1999. “The ‘Nonprofit Defense’ in Hospital Merger Antitrust Litigation,” Antitrust, Spring 1999: 13–19.Google Scholar
Brody, Evelyn. 1996. “Agents Without Principals: The Economic Convergence of the Nonprofit and For-Profit Organizational Forms,” New York Law School Law Review 40(3): 460–536.Google Scholar
Brunsson, Nils and Jacobsson, Bengt, eds. 2001. A World of Standards. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Burrows, Emily. 2010. “Termination of Sound Recording Copyrights & the Potential Unconscionability of Work for Hire Clauses,” Review of Litigation. 30: 101.Google Scholar
Burrows, Vanessa K. 2008. FDA Authority to Regulate On-Farm Activity. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service.Google Scholar
Busch, Richard. 2012. “Fighting for the Right to Superman’s Copyright: More Brutal than Anything Lex Luther Could Have Imagined,” Forbes, November 1, 2012. www.forbes.com/sites/richardbusch/2012/11/01/truth-justice-and-the-american-way-fighting-for-the-right-to-supermans-copyright-more-brutal-than-anything-lex-luthor-or-the-legion-of-doom-could-have-ever-imagined/.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim. 2008. “The Globalization of Health and Safety Standards: Delegation of Regulatory Authority in the SPS Agreement of 1994 Establishing the World Trade Organization,” Law and Contemporary Problems 71: 219.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter. 2003. “Setting International Standards – Technological Rationality or Primacy of Power?” World Politics 56: 1.Google Scholar
Büthe, Tim and Mattli, Walter. 2011. The New Global Rulers. The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cabral, Luis and Salant, David. 2014. “Evolving technologies and standards regulation,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 36: 48–56.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio. 2006. “Rethinking Private Regulation in the European Regulatory Space” in Cafaggi, F., ed., Reframing Self-Regulation in European Private Law. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar
Cafaggi, Fabrizio. 2012. “New Foundations of Transnational Private Regulation,” Journal of Law and Society 38(1):20–49.Google Scholar
Cardi, W. Jonathan. 2005. “Purging Foreseeability,” Vanderbilt Law Review 58(3): 739–809.Google Scholar
Carpenter, Daniel and Moss, David A.. 2014. Preventing Regulatory Capture: Special Interest Influence and How to Limit It. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Claire S. 2004. “What Does ‘Organic’ Mean Now?: Chickens and Wild Fish Are Undermining the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990,” San Joaquin Agricultural Law Review 14: 117–41.Google Scholar
Champigneulle-Mihailov, Jeanne. 2000. “Les Aspects Juridiques de la Normalisation en France” in Schepel, H. and Falke, J., eds., Legal Aspects of Standardisation in the Member States of the EC and EFTA, Volume 2: Country Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Cheit, Ross H. 1990. Setting Safety Standards: Regulation in the Public and Private Sectors. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2013. Constitutional Law, 4th ed. New York: Wolters Kluwer Law & Business.Google Scholar
Chesbrough, Henry. 2003. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Chiao, B., Lerner, J. and Tirole, J.. 2007. “The Rules of Standard-Setting Organizations: An Empirical Analysis,” RAND Journal of Economics 38: 905–30.Google Scholar
Choi, Dong Geun, Lee, Heesang, and Sung, Tae-kyung. 2011. “Research profiling for standardization and innovation,” Scientometrics 88(1): 259–78.Google Scholar
Choi, Stephen S. 1998. “Market Lessons for Gatekeepers,” Northwestern University Law Review 92: 916–66.Google Scholar
Chon, Margaret. 2018. “Certification and Collective Marks in the United States” in Ginsburg, Jane and Calboli, Irene, eds., Cambridge Handbook on International and Comparative Trademark Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Clark, Kendall Grant. 2003. “ISO to Require Royalties?” XML.com, September 24, 2003. www.xml.com/pub/a/2003/09/24/deviant.htmlGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ramsay. 1967. Attorney General’s Memorandum on the Public Information Section of the Administrative Procedure Act (July 4, 1967).Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr. 2002. “It’s About the Gatekeepers, Stupid,” Business Lawyer 57(4): 1403–20.Google Scholar
Coffee, John C. Jr. 2004. Gatekeepers: The Professions and Corporate Governance. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, Daniel. 2008. The History, Politics & Perils of the Current Food Safety Controversy. Davis, CA: Community Alliance with Family Farmers. www.perishablepundit.com/docs/CAFF.Policy.Guide.l.pdfGoogle Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. 2011. “An Empirical Study of the Effects of Ex Ante Licensing Disclosure Policies on the Development of Voluntary Technical Standards.” NIST, No. GCR 11–934.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. 2013. “Technical Standards and Ex Ante Disclosure: Results and Analysis of an Empirical Stud,” Jurimetrics 53(1): 163–211.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. 2016. “A Tale of Two Layers: Patents, Standardization, and the Internet,” Denver University Law Review 93(4): 853–95.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. 2019. “Patents, Technical Standards and Standards-Setting Organizations: A Survey of the Empirical, Legal and Economic Literature” in Menell, Peter and Schwarz, David, eds., Research Handbooks on the Economics of Intellectual Property Law, Vol. 2 – Analytical Methods. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. and Hernacki, Andrew. 2014. “Copyright Termination and Technical Standards,” University of Baltimore Law Review 43: 221–53.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L., Meghan, Lewis, and Roth, Hannah. 2011. “Toward a Rational Framework for Sustainable Building Materials Standards,” Standards Engineering 63(5): 1–7.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. and McManis, Charles R.. 2013. “Intellectual Property Landscape of Material Sustainability Standards,” Columbia Science & Technology Law Review 14: 485–513.Google Scholar
Contreras, Jorge L. and Updegrove, Andrew. 2016. “A Primer on Intellectual Property Policies of Standards Bodies” in Jacobs, Kai, ed., Effective Standardization Management in Corporate Settings. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, pp. 215–35.Google Scholar
Cover, Robin. 2003. “Standards Organizations Express Concern About Royalty Fees for ISO Codes,” Cover Pages, Sepember 20, 2003.Google Scholar
Curcuru, Shane. 2017. “Three Reactions to the Facebook Patents License.” Medium.com. https://medium.com/@shanecurcuru/three-reactions-to-the-facebook-patents-license-b64e6942012bGoogle Scholar
David, Paul A. 1985. “Clio and the Economics of QWERTY,” American Economics Review 75: 332.Google Scholar
Davis, Michael H. 2000. “The Screenwriter’s Indestructible Right to Terminate Her Assignment of Copyright: Once a Story is ‘Pitched,’ A Studio Can Never Obtain All Copyrights in the Story,” Cardozo Arts & Entertainment Law Journal. 18: 93.Google Scholar
Dawson, Norma. 1988. Certification Trade Marks: Law and Practice. London: Intellectual Property Publishing Ltd.Google Scholar
Day, Julia. 2004. “Burberry Doffs Its Cap to ‘Chavs,’” The Guardian, November 1, 2004.Google Scholar
Delaney, Helen and van de Zande, Rene. 2000. “NIST Special Public 951, A Guide to EU Standards and Conformity Assessment.”Google Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis. 2011. “Protecting Public Morals in a Digital Age : Revisiting the WTO Rulings on US – Gambling and China – Publications and Audiovisual Services,” Journal of International Economic Law 14(2): 257.Google Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis. 2018. “Global Standard-Seting 2.0: How the WTO Spotlights ISO and Impacts the Transnational Standard-Setting Process,” Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law 28: 101.Google Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis and Kanevskaia, Olia. 2018. “Exit, Voice and Loyalty in Standards Development Organizations: Strategic Behaviour in IEEE” (working paper).Google Scholar
Delimatsis, Panagiotis (ed.). 2015. The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Demortain, David. 2011. Scientists and the Regulation of Risk: Standardizing Control. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
DeNardis, Laura. 2008/2009. “Open Standards and Global Politics,” International Journal of Communications Law & Policy 13: 168.Google Scholar
Devlin, Alan. 2009. “Standard-Setting and the Failure of Price Competition,” NYU Annual Survey of American Law 65: 217.Google Scholar
DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W.. 1991. “Introduction,” in DiMaggio, Paul J. and Powell, Walter W., eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dinwoodie, Graeme B. 1999. “The Death of Ontology: A Teleological Approach to Trademark Law,” Iowa Law Review 84(4): 611–752.Google Scholar
Dobbs, Dan B., Hayden, Paul T., and Bublick, Ellen M.. 2. 2016. Hornbook on Torts. St. Paul, MN: West Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Doctorow, Cory. 2005. “WiFi isn’t short for Wireless Fidelity,” BoingBoing, November 8, 2005, https://boingboing.net/2005/11/08/wifi-isnt-short-for.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dogan, Stacey L. and Lemley, Mark A.. 2004. “Trademarks and Consumer Search Costs on the Internet,” Houston Law Review 41(3): 777–838.Google Scholar
Donnelly, C. 2007. Delegation of Governmental Power to Private Parties – A Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dornis, Tim W. and Wein, Thomas. 2016. “Trademarks, Comparative Advertising and Product Imitations: An Untold Story of Law and Economics,” Pennsylvania State University Law Review 121: 421.Google Scholar
Drexl, Josef. 2012. “Anti-competitive Stumbling Stones on the Way to a Cleaner world: Protecting Competition in Innovation without a Market,” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 8: 507.Google Scholar
Dreyfuss, Rochelle Cooper. 1990. “Expressive Genericity: Trademarks as Language in the Pepsi Generation,” Notre Dame Law Review 65(3): 397–424.Google Scholar
Easterbrook, Frank H. and Fischel, Daniel R.. 1996. The Economic Structure of Corporate Law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Edelman, Benjamin. 2010. “Adverse selection in online ‘trust’ certifications and search results,” Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 10(1): 17–25.Google Scholar
Edelman, Lauren B. and Suchman, Marc C.. 2007. “Introduction” in Edelman, Lauren B. and Suchman, Marc C., eds., The Legal Lives of Private Organizations. Hampshire, UK: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Edwards, Paul N. 2012. “Knowledge Infrastructures: Intellectual Frameworks and Research Challenges.” http://pne.people.si.umich.edu/PDF/Edwards_etal_2013_Knowledge_Infrastructures.pdfGoogle Scholar
Egan, Michelle. 2001. Constructing a European Market: Standards, Regulation, and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Egyedi, Tineke. 2000a. “Institutional Dilemma in ICT Standardisation: Co-ordinating the Diffusion of Technology?,” in Jakobs, Kai, ed., Information Technology Standards and Standardisation: A Global Perspective. London. Idea Group Publishing.Google Scholar
Egyedi, Tineke. 2000b. “Compatibility Strategies in Licensing, Open Sourcing and Standardisation: The case of JavaTM,” in Coenen, Heide, Holler, Manfred J., and Niskanen, Esko. eds., 5th Helsinki Workshop on Standardization and Networks. Helsinki: Government Institute for Economic Research.Google Scholar
Egyedi, Tineke. 2001. “Beyond Consortia, Beyond Standardisation? New Case Material and Policy Threads – Final Report for the European Commission.”Google Scholar
Egyedi, Tineke. 2007. “Standard-compliant, but incompatible?!,” Computer Standards & Interface 29(6): 605–13.Google Scholar
Eisape, Davis and Boehm, Mirko. 2018 “Standard Setting Organisations and Open Source Communities – Partners or Competitors?” Open Source Summit, Vancouver, BC (August 30).Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Theodore and Macey, Jonathan. 2004. “Was Arthur Andersen Different? An Empirical Examination of Major Accounting Firm Audits of Large Clients,” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 1(2): 263–300.Google Scholar
Endres, Bryan and Johnson, Nicholas. 2011. “Integrating Stakeholder Roles in Food Production, Marketing, and Safety Systems: An Evolving Multi-Jurisdictional Approach,” Journal of Environmental Law and Litigation 26: 29–108.Google Scholar
Ericson, Richard V. and Doyle, Aaron. 2004. Uncertain Business: Risk, Insurance, and the Limits of Knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Esty, Daniel C. 2006. “Good Governance at the Supranational Scale: Globalizing Administrative Law,” Yale Law Journal 115: 1490–562.Google Scholar
Ewick, Patricia and Silbey, Susan. 1998. The Common Place of Law: Stories from Everyday Life. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph and Saloner, G.. 1988. “Coordination through Committees and Markets,” RAND Journal of Economics 19: 235.Google Scholar
Farrell, Joseph and Simcoe, Timothy. 2012. “Choosing the Rules for Consensus Standardization,” RAND Journal of Economics 43: 235.Google Scholar
Featherston, Charles, Ho, Jae-Yun, Brevignon-Dodin, Laure, and O’Sullivan, Eoin. 2016. “Mediating and catalyzing innovation: a framework for anticipating the standardization needs of emerging technologies,” Technovation 48–49: 25–40.Google Scholar
Feldmeier, Robert C. 1999. “The Risk of Negligence Liability for Trade Associations Engaged in Standards Setting or Product Certification,” Tort & Insurance Law Journal 34(3): 785–97.Google Scholar
Fitzgerald, Patrick. 2016. “PricewaterhouseCoopers Settles $5.5 Billion Crisis Era Lawsuit,” Wall Street Journal, August 26.Google Scholar
Folsom, Ralph A. and Teply, Larry L.. 1980. “Trademarked Generic Words,” Yale Law Journal. 89: 1323.Google Scholar
Food Safety News. 2014. “FDA’s Taylor Stresses Industry/Government Cooperation to Enforce FSMA.” Food Safety Magazine. www.foodsafetymagazine.com/news/fdas-taylor-stresses-industry-government-cooperation-to-enforce-fsma/Google Scholar
Foray, Dominique and Lundvall, Bengt-Aake. 1998. The Knowledge-Based Economy: From the economics of knowledge to the learning economy. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Frankel, Alison. 2018. “At heart of FDIC’s win v. PwC, an unsettled theory.” Reuters. January 2.Google Scholar
Freeman, Jody. 2000. “Private Parties, Public Functions and the New Administrative Law,” Administrative Law Review 52: 813–58.Google Scholar
Fromer, Jeanne C. 2009a. “Claiming Intellectual Property,” University of Chicago Law Review 76(2): 719–96.Google Scholar
Fromer, Jeanne C. 2017. “The Unregulated Certification Mark(et),” Stanford Law Review 69(1): 121–200.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Doris, Kalfagianni, Agni, and Havinga, Tetty. 2009. “Actors in Private Food Governance: The Legitimacy of Retail Standards and Multistakeholder Initiatives with Civil Participation,” Agriculture and Human Values 28(3): 353–67.Google Scholar
Galetovic, Alexander and Haber, Stephen. 2017. “The Fallacies of Patent-Holdup Theory,” Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 13(1): 1–44.Google Scholar
Galland, Jean-Pierre. 2017. “Big Third-Party Certifiers and the Construction of Transnational Regulation,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 670 (March): 263–79.Google Scholar
Galle, Brian. 2017. “Self-Regulation of Social Enterprise,” in Research Handbook on Social Enterprise Law (forthcoming). Available at https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2978023Google Scholar
Gamalielsson, Jonas and Lundell, Björn. 2013. “Experiences from implementing PDF in Open Source: Challenges and opportunities for standardisation processes,” 8th International Conference on Standardization and Innovation in Information Technology (SIIT).Google Scholar
Gasser, Urs and Palfrey, John. 2007. DRM-protected Music Interoperability and eInnovation, Berkman Publication Series 6, http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/interop/pdfs/interop-drm-music.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ghosh, Rishab Aiyer and Schmidt, Philipp. 2006. Open Source and Open Standards: A New Frontier for Economic Development? United Nations University.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald and Kraakman, Reinier H.. 1984. “The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency,” Virginia Law Review 70: 549–643.Google Scholar
Gilson, Ronald and Kraakman, Reinier H.. 2003. “The Mechanisms of Market Efficiency Twenty Years Later: The Hindsight Bias,” Journal of Corporation Law 28: 715–42.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Victor P. 1988. “Accountable Accountants: Is Third-Party Liability Necessary?” Journal of Legal Studies 17(2): 295–312.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Victor P. 2006. Framing Contract Law: An Economic Perspective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Originally published as: “A Reexamination of Glanzer v. Shepard: Surveyors on the Tort-Contract Boundary,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law. 2: 476–510.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Paul. 2002. Goldstein on Copyright, 3rd ed. (2005 & 2017-2 Supplement). New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Gravani, Robert B. 2009. “The Role of Good Agricultural Practices in Produce Safety,” in Fan, Xuetong, Brenda A. Niemira, Christopher J. Doona, Florence E. Feeherry, and Robert B. Gravani, eds, Microbial Safety of Fresh Produce. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Graver-de-Looper, Milca. 2016. “Registering an Acronym as a Trademark,” International Asset Management – International Reports, February 16, 2016.Google Scholar
Greve, Georg C. F. 2008a. Analysis on Balance: Standardisation and Patents, FSFE, https://fsfe.org/activities/os/ps.en.pdfGoogle Scholar
Greve, Georg C. F. 2008b. Sovereign Software: Open Standards, Free Software, and the Internet, FSFE, https://fsfe.org/activities/policy/igf/sovsoft.en.htmlGoogle Scholar
Griswold, Erwin N. 1934. “Government in Ignorance of the Law – A Plea for Better Publication of Executive Legislation,” Harvard Law Review 48(2): 198–215.Google Scholar
Haapanen, Anna. 2015. “Free and Open Source Software and the Mystery of Software Patent Licenses Under the GPL,” International Free and Open Source Software Law Review 7(1): 19–28.Google Scholar
Halabi, Sam F. and Lin, Ching-Fu. 2017. “Assessing the Relative Influence and Efficacy of Public and Private Food Safety Regulation Regimes: Comparing Codex and Global G.A.P. Standards,” Food and Drug Journal 72(2): 262–94.Google Scholar
Hamilton, Robert W. 1978. “The Role of Nongovernmental Standards in the Development of Mandatory Federal Standards Affecting Safety or Health,” Texas Law Review 56(8): 1329–1484.Google Scholar
Hammar, Mark. 2015. “First-, Second- & Third-Party Audits, What are the Differences?,” ISO 9001 Blog. Archived at https://perma.cc/5UPJ-2SHNGoogle Scholar
Hanns, Ullrich. 2017. “FRAND Access to open standards and the patent exclusivity: Restating the Principles,” Concurrences, No. 2-2017.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry. 1980. “The Role of Nonprofit Enterprise,” Yale Law Journal 89(5): 835–901.Google Scholar
Hansmann, Henry. 1996. The Ownership of Enterprise. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hass, Nancy. 2010. “Earning Her Stripes,” Wall Street Journal Magazine, September 10, 2010.Google Scholar
Heidt, Robert H. 2010. “Damned for their Judgment: The Tort Liability of Standards Development Organizations,” Wake Forest Law Review 45(5): 1227–85.Google Scholar
Heiner, David A. 2011. “Five Suggestions for Promoting Competition Through Standards,” Competition Law International 7: 20.Google Scholar
Hettne, Jörgen. 2008. Rättsprinciper som styrmedel – Allmänna Rättsprinciper i EU:s Domstol, Stockholm: Nordstedts Juridik.Google Scholar
Hettne, Jörgen. 2017. “Standard, Barriers to Trade and EU Internal Markets Rules: Need for a Renewed Approach,” Legal Issues of Economic Integration 44: 409–20.Google Scholar
Hill, Claire A. 2004. “Regulation the Rating Agencies,” Washington University Law Quarterly 82(1): 43–94.Google Scholar
Hodges, Christopher. 2005. European Regulation of Consumer Product Safety. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, William C. 2012. Intellectual Property and Antitrust Law. New York: Clark Boardman Callaghan.Google Scholar
Hood, Christopher, Rothstein, Henry, and Baldwin, Robert. 2001. The Government of Risk: Understanding Risk Regulation Regimes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hopkins, Bruce R. 2007. The Law of Tax-Exempt Organizations. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Publishing.Google Scholar
Horner, Johannes. 2002. “Reputation and Competition,” American Economics Review 92(3): 644–63.Google Scholar
Hovenkamp, Herbert, Mark A. Lemley, and Mark D. Janis. 2012. IP and Antitrust: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles Applied to Intellectual Property Law. New York: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert. 2006. “A New Device for Creating International Legal Normativity: The WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and ‘International Standards.’” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E., eds., Constitutionalism: Multilevel Trade Governance and Social Regulation. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Howse, Robert and Langille, J.. 2012. “Permitting Pluralism: The Seal Products Dispute and Why the WTO Should Accept Trade Restrictions Justified by Non-Instrumental Moral Values,” Yale Journal of International Law 37: 367.Google Scholar
Hughes, Justin. 2005. “Size Matters (Or Should) in Copyright Law,” Fordham Law Review 74(2): 575–638.Google Scholar
Hughes, Justin. 2006. “Champagne, Feta, and Bourbon: The Spirited Debate About Geographical Indications,” Hastings Law Journal 58(2): 299–386.Google Scholar
Intel Corp. (n.d.). “Two decades of ‘plug and play’ – How USB became the most successful interface in the history of computing.” www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/standards/usb-two-decades-of-plug-and-play-article.htmlGoogle Scholar
International M&A Partners (IMAP). 2010. Food and Beverage Industry Global Report – 2010. www.proman.fi/sites/default/files/Food%20%26%20beverage%20global%20report%202010_0.pdfGoogle Scholar
Jahn, Gabriele, Schramm, Matthias, and Spiller, Achim. 2005. “The Reliability of Certification: Quality Labels as a Consumer Policy Tool,” Journal of Consumer Policy 28: 53–73.Google Scholar
Jakobs, Kai. 2006. “ICT Standards Research -Quo Vadis?,” Homo Oeconomicus 23(1): 79–107.Google Scholar
Jensen, Chris and Scacchi, Walt. 2010. “Governance in Open Source Software Development Projects: A Comparative Multi-level Analysis,” IFIP International Conference on Open Source Systems OSS 2010: Open Source Software: New Horizons 130–42.Google Scholar
Jin, Ginger Zhe and Kato, Andrew. 2006. “Price, Quality and Reputation: Evidence from an Online Experiment,” RAND Journal of Economics 37(4): 983–1004.Google Scholar
Johnson, . 2017. “Why Companies Don’t Want You to Take Their Brand Names in Vain,” Economist, September 9, 2017.Google Scholar
Jorde, Thomas M. 1987. “Antitrust and the New State Action Doctrine: A Return to Deferential Economic Federalism,” California Law Review 75: 227–56.Google Scholar
Kappos, David J. 2017. “Open Source Software and Standards Development Organizations: Symbiotic Functions in the Innovation Equation,” Columbia Science and Technology Law Review 18: 259–69.Google Scholar
Katcher, Susan. 2006. “Legal Training in the United States: A Brief History,” Wisconsin International Law Journal 24: 335–75.Google Scholar
Keeton, W. Page, Dobbs, Dan B., Keeton, Robert E., and Owen, David G.. 1984. Prosser and Keeton on Torts, 5th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Pub. Co.Google Scholar
Kelderman, Eric. 2011. “American Bar Association Takes Heat from Advisory Panel on Accreditation,” Chronicle of Higher Education. June 9.Google Scholar
Kempa, Richard. 2009. “Towards Free/Libre Open Source Software (‘FLOSS’) Governance in the Organisation,” IFOSSLR 1: 61–72.Google Scholar
Kesan, Jay. 2011. “The Fallacy of OSS Discrimination by FRAND Licensing: An Empirical Analysis,” Illinois Public Law Research Paper No. 10–14. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1767083Google Scholar
King, Rachael. 2014. “Open Source ‘Eating’ Software World: Samsung,” Blogs Wall Street Journal, May 5, 2014. http://blogs.wsj.com/cio/2014/05/05/open-source-eating-software-world-samsung/Google Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico, and Stewart, Richard B.. 2005. “The Emergence of Global Administrative Law,” Law and Contemporary Problems 68: 15.Google Scholar
Klein, Benjamin and Leffler, Keith B.. 1981. “The Role of Market Forces in Assuring Contractual Performance,” Journal of Political Economy 89(4): 615–41.Google Scholar
Kogan, Lawrence A. 2011. “Commercial High Technology Innovations Face Uncertain Future Amid Emerging ‘BRICS’ Compulsory Licensing and IT Interoperability Frameworks,” San Diego International Law Journal. 13: 201.Google Scholar
Kohnke, Matthew. 2007. “Reeling in a Rogue Industry: Lethal E. coli in California’s Leafy Green Produce & the Regulatory Response,” Drake Journal of Agricultural Law 12: 493–520.Google Scholar
Kono, D. 2006. “Optimal Obfuscation: Democracy and Trade Policy Transparency,” American Political Science Review 100: 369.Google Scholar
Kozierok, Charles M. 2005. The TCP/IP Guide: A Comprehensive Illustrated Internet Protocols Reference, No Starch Press.Google Scholar
Krechmer, Ken. 2006. “Open Standards Requirements,” International Journal of Information Technology Standards Research 4(1): 43.Google Scholar
Krill, Paul. 2008. “JavaScript creator ponders past, future,” Infoworld. www.infoworld.com/article/2653798/application-development/javascript-creator-ponders-past--future.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kruse, Chad M. 2006. “The Not-So-Organic Dairy Regulations of the Organic Food Production Act of 1990,” Southern Illinois University Law Journal 30(3): 501–31.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Bradley M. 2014. “Why Your Project Doesn’t Need a Contributor Licensing Agreement.” http://ebb.org/bkuhn/blog/2014/06/09/do-not-need-cla.htmlGoogle Scholar
Kurtz, Leslie. 1989. “Copyright: The Scenes a Faire Doctrine,” Florida Law Review 41(1): 79–114.Google Scholar
Landes, William M. and Posner, Richard A.. 1987. “Trademark Law: An Economic Perspective,” Journal of Law & Economics 30(2): 265–309.Google Scholar
Lane, C. 1997. “The Social Regulation of Inter-Firm Relations in Britain and Germany: Market Rules, Legal Norms and Technical Standards,” Cambridge Journal of Economics 21: 197.Google Scholar
Lankarani, Nazanin. 2009. “Special Report: A Swiss Debate,” New York Times, March 26, 2009.Google Scholar
Larouche, Pierre and Van Overwalle, Geertrui. 2015. “Interoperability standards, patents and competition policy” in Delimatsis, P., ed., The Law, Economics and Politics of International Standardization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lawson, Richard. 2017. Exclusion Clauses and Unfair Contract Terms, 12th ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Lazer, David. 2001. “Regulatory Interdependence and International Governance,” Journal of European Public Policy 8(3): 474.Google Scholar
Lerner, Josh and Tirole, Jean. 2015. “Standard-Essential Patents,” Journal of Political Economy 123: 547.Google Scholar
Lerner, Josh and Shankerman, Mark. 2010. The Comingled Code. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, David. 2011. “Regulation and Regulatory Governance” in Levi-Faur, David, ed., Handbook on the Politics of Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, David. 2018. “Collaboration in open source license enforcement – a community movement is happening.” Redhat. www.redhat.com/en/blog/collaboration-open-source-license-enforcement-community-movement-happeningGoogle Scholar
Lewis, James A. 2010. Government Open Source Policies, Center for Strategic and International Studies.Google Scholar
Li, Jingze. 2017. “Intellectual property licensing tensions in incorporating open source into formal standard setting context – The case of Apache V.2 in ETSI as a start,” ITU Kaleidoscope: Challenges for a Data-Driven Society 2017: 1–8.Google Scholar
Lisovy, R., Sojka, M., and Hanzalek, Z.. 2014. “IEEE 802.11p Linux Kernel Implementation. Czech Technical University in Prague.” https://rtime.felk.cvut.cz/publications/public/ieee80211p_linux_2014_final_report.pdfGoogle Scholar
Lizzeri, Alessandro. 1999. “Information revelation and certifiers,” RAND Journal of Economics 30: 214–31.Google Scholar
Lohr, Steve. 2005. “Plan by 13 Nations Urges Open Technology Standards,” N.Y. Times, September 9, 2005, www.nytimes.com/2005/09/09/technology/plan-by-13-nations-urges-open-technology-standards.htmlGoogle Scholar
Lopez-Berzosa, David and Gawer, Annabelle. 2014. “Innovation policy within private collectives: evidence on 3GPP’s regulation mechanism to facilitate collective innovation,” Technovation 34(12): 734–45.Google Scholar
Loren, Lydia Pallas. 2010. “Renegotiating the Copyright Deal in the Shadow of the “Inalienable” Right to Terminate,” Florida Law Review 62: 1329.Google Scholar
Loren, Lydia Pallas and Joseph, Scott Miller. 2017. Intellectual Property Law: Cases and Materials, 5th ed. Oregon City, OR: Semaphore Press.Google Scholar
Lundell, Björn and Gamalielsson, Jonas. 2017. “On the potential for improved standardisation through use of Open Source work practices in different standardisation organisations: How can Open Source-projects contribute to development of IT-standards?,” EURAS Proceedings, 137–55.Google Scholar
Lundell, Björn, Gamalielsson, Jonas, Grahn, Alexander, Feist, Jonas, Gustavsson, Tomas, and Strindberg, Hendrik. 2014. “On influences between software standards and their implementations in open source projects,” Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Open Collaboration 1–10.Google Scholar
Lundqvist, Björn. 2014. Standardization Under EU Competition Rules and US Antitrust Laws. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Lundqvist, Björn. 2017. “European Harmonized Standards as Part of EU Law: The Implications of the James Elliot Case for Copyright Protection and, Possibly, for EU Competition Law,” Journal of Economic Integration 44: 421–36.Google Scholar
Lundqvist, Björn. 2018. “Competition and Data Pools,” Journal of European Consumer and Market Law 7(4): 146–54.Google Scholar
Lytton, Timothy D. 2013. Kosher: Private Regulation in the Age of Industrial Food. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lytton, Timothy D. 2014. “Competitive Third-Party Regulation: How Private Certification Can Overcome Constraints That Frustrate Government Regulation,” Theoretical Inquiries in Law 15(2): 539–71.Google Scholar
Lytton, Timothy D. 2019a. Outbreak: Foodborne Illness and the Struggle for Food Safety. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lytton, Timothy D. 2019b. “Exposing Private Third-Party Food Safety Auditors to Civil Liability for Negligence: Harnessing Private Law Norms to Regulate Private Governance,” European Review of Private Law 27(2): 353–78.Google Scholar
Lytton, Timothy D. and McAllister, Lesley. 2014. “Oversight in Private Food Safety Auditing: Addressing Auditor Conflict of Interest,” Wisconsin Law Review 2014: 289–335.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 2003. “Efficient Capital Markets, Corporate Disclosure, and Enron,” Cornell Law Review 89: 394–422.Google Scholar
Macey, Jonathan R. 2010. “The Demise of the Reputational Model in Capital Markets: The Problem of the ‘Last Period Parasites’,” Syracuse Law Review 60: 427–48.Google Scholar
Mahoney, Paul. 2005. “Public and Private Rule Making in Securities,” in Niskanen, William A., ed., After Enron: Lessons for Public Policy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
Majone, Giandomenico. 2000. “International Regulatory Cooperation: A Neo-Institutionalist Approach” in Bermann, George, Matthias Herdegen, and Peter L. Lindseth, eds., Transatlantic Regulatory Co-operation: Legal Problems and Political Prospects. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Ronald. 2006. “Commercializing Open Source Software: Do Property Rights Still Matter?” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 20(1): 1–47.Google Scholar
Marasco, Amy. 2005. “Standards Development: Are You at Risk?” American National Standards Inst., www.ansi.org/news_publications/other_documents/risk?menuid=7Google Scholar
Marceau, G. and Trachtman, J.. 2002. “The Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement, the Sanitary and Phytosanitary Measures Agreement, and The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade: A Map of the World Trade Organization Law of Domestic Regulation of Goods,” Journal of World Trade 36(5): 811.Google Scholar
Martin, Timothy W. and Grossman, Andrew. 2015. “S&P To Pay $1.5 Billion to Resolve Crisis-Era Litigation,” Wall Street Journal, February 3.Google Scholar
Mataija, Mislav. 2016. Private Regulation and the Internal Market: Sports, Legal Services, and Standard Setting in EU Economic Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Maurer, Stephen M. 2017. Self-Governance in Science: Community-Based Strategies for Managing Dangerous Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mavroidis, P. 2013. “Driftin’ too far from shore – Why the test for compliance with the TBT Agreement developed by the WTO Appellate Body is wrong, and what should the AB have done instead,” World Trade Review 12(3): 509.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. Thomas. 2008. McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition, 4th ed. Eagan, MN: Clark Boardman Callaghan.Google Scholar
McCarthy, J. Thomas. 2017. McCarthy on Trademarks and Unfair Competition. Eagan, MN: Thomson West.Google Scholar
McKenna, Mark P. 2007. “The Normative Foundations of Trademark Law,” Notre Dame Law Review 82(5): 1839–916.Google Scholar
McKenna, Mark P. 2012. “A Consumer Decision-Making Theory of Trademark Law,” Virginia Law Review 98(1): 67–141.Google Scholar
Meeker, Heather. 2017. “Patrick McHardy and copyright profiteering.” OpenSource.com. https://opensource.com/article/17/8/patrick-mchardy-and-copyright-profiteeringGoogle Scholar
Meidinger, Errol. 2006. “The Administrative Law of Global Public-Private Regulation: The Case of Forestry,” European Journal of International Law 17(1): 47–87.Google Scholar
Meidinger, Errol. 2008. “Multi-Interest Self-Governance Through Global Product Certification Programmes” in Olaf Dilling, Martin Herberg, and Gerd Winter, eds., Responsible Business: Self-Governance and Law in Transnational Economic Transactions. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Melendez-Juarbe, Hiram. 2009. “DRM Interoperability,” Boston University Journal of Science and Technology law. 15: 181.Google Scholar
Menchetti, Patrizio. 2000. “Legal Aspects of Standardisation in Italy” in Schepel, H. and Falke, J., eds. Legal Aspects of Standardisation in the Member States of the EC and EFTA, Volume 2: Country Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Mendelson, Nina A. 2014. “Private Control over Access to Public Law: The Perplexing Federal Regulatory Use of Private Standards,” Michigan Law Review 112(5): 737–807.Google Scholar
Menell, Peter S. and Nimmer, David. 2010. “Pooh-Poohing Copyright Law’s ‘Inalienable’ Termination Rights,” Journal of the Copyright Society of the U.S.A. 57: 799.Google Scholar
Messerlin, P. 2001. Measuring the Costs of Protection in Europe: European Commercial Policy in the 2000s. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics Press.Google Scholar
Minder, Raphael. 2012. “In Watch Industry, a Feud over What Makes a Timepiece Swiss-Made,” New York Times, April 27, 2012.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Iain and Mason, Stephen. 2011. “Compatibility Of The Licensing Of Embedded Patents With Open Source Licensing Terms,” International Free and Open Source Software Law Review 1(3): 25–58.Google Scholar
Molinaro, John. 2004. “Who Owns Captain America? Contested Authorship, Work-for-Hire, and Termination Rights under the Copyright Act of 1976,” Georgia State University Law Review 21: 565.Google Scholar
Moodey, Glyn. 2016. “FRAND is no friend: How to make EU tech standards compatible with open source,” ArsTechnica, September 5, 2016. https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2016/05/eu-tech-standards-why-frand-not-compatible-with-open-source/Google Scholar
Motaal, A. 2004. “The ‘Multilateral Scientific Consensus’ and the World Trade Organization,” Journal of World Trade 38(5): 855.Google Scholar
Muller, Benoit. 2011. “Study on the Interplay between Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs): Annex V: Views and Trends with Respect to Standards and IPRs,” Tender No ENTR/09/015, Final Report.Google Scholar
Nakagawa, J. 2011. International Harmonization of Economic Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Narayanan, V.K. and Chen, Tianxu. 2012. “Research on Technology Standards: Accomplishment and Challenges,” Research Policy 41(8): 1375–406.Google Scholar
National Academies of Science (NAS). 2013. Intellectual Property Challenges For Standard-Setting in the Global Economy, Maskus, Keith and Merrill, Stephen A., eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 1985. An Evaluation of the Role of Microbiological Criteria for Foods and Food Ingredients. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). 2013. Intellectual Property Challenges For Standard-Setting in the Global Economy, Maskus, Keith and Merrill, Stephen A., eds. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Niazi, Eren. 2014. “5 ways open source is transforming tech in 2014,” Opensource.com, February 18, 2014.Google Scholar
Nicolas, Florence. 1994. Common Standards for Enterprises. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Niemira, Brendan A, Xuetong Fan, Christopher J. Doona, Florence E. Feeherry, and Robert B. Gravani. 2009. “Research Needs and Future Directions” in Fan, Xuetong, Brendan A. Niemira, Christopher J. Doona, Florence E. Feeherry, and Robert B. Gravani, eds, Microbial Safety of Fresh Produce. Ames, IA: Wiley-Blackwell, pp. 419–25.Google Scholar
Nimmer, Melville B. 1977. “Termination of Transfers under the Copyright Act of 1976,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 125: 947.Google Scholar
Note, . 1963. “Developments in the Law: Judicial Control of Actions of Private Associations,” Harvard Law Review 76(5): 983–1100.Google Scholar
Note, . 1966. “The Federal Register and the Code of Federal Regulations – A Reappraisal,” Harvard Law Review 80(2): 439–51.Google Scholar
O’Hara, Maureen. 1981. “Property Rights and the Financial Firm,” Journal of Law & Economics 24(2): 317–32.Google Scholar
Ohlhausen, Maureen K. 2006. “Enforcement Perspectives on the Noerr-Pennington Doctrine,” FTC Staff Report.Google Scholar
Olshan, Marc A. 1993. “Standards-Making Organizations and the Rationalization of American Life,” The Sociological Quarterly 34(2): 319–35.Google Scholar
Olshefsky, Jim and Hugo, Joe. 2003. “How To: Getting Key Stakeholder Participation,” Standardization News. www.astm.org/SNEWS/JUNE_2003/howto_jun03.htmlGoogle Scholar
Ouellette, Lisa Larrimore. 2016. “Pierson, Peer Review, and Patent Law,” Vanderbilt Law Review 69(6): 1825.Google Scholar
Pacelli, Andrea. 2008. “Who Owns the Key to the Vault? Hold-up, Lock-out, and Other Copyright Strategies,” 18 Fordham Intellectual Property, Media and Entertainment Law Journal 18: 1229.Google Scholar
Palmieri, Richard D. 2012. “Who’s the Author? A Bright-Line Rule for Specially Commissioned Works Made for Hire,” University of Richmond Law Review 46: 1175.Google Scholar
Partnoy, Frank, Richard M. Levich, Giovanni Majnoni, and Carmen Reinhart. 2002. “The Paradox of Credit Ratings” in Levich, Richard M. et al. eds., Ratings, Rating Agencies and the Global Financial System. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 65–84.Google Scholar
Pentheroudakis, Chryssoula and Baron, Justus A.. 2017. “Licensing Terms of Standard Essential Patents: A Comprehensive Analysis of Cases,” JRC Science for Policy Report EUR 28302.Google Scholar
Perens, Bruce, Chris DiBona, Sam Ockman, and Mark Stone. 1999. “Open Source Definition” in DiBona, Chris et al. eds., Open Sources: Voices from the Open Source Revolution. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly Media, pp. 171, 172.Google Scholar
Perens, Bruce. 2002. Open Standards: Principles and Practice, perens.com, https://web.archive.org/web/20020601162710/http://perens.com/OpenStandards/Definition.htmlGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Shane. 2007. What Domino Effect?, Govt. Tech., www.govtech.com/policy-management/What-Domino-Effect.htmlGoogle Scholar
Phelps, Jon L. 2010. “Copyleft Termination: Will the Termination Provision of the Copyright Act of 1976 Undermine the Free Software Foundation’s General Public License?” Jurimetrics Journal 50: 261.Google Scholar
Pohlmann, Tim. 2014. “The Evolution of ICT Standards Consortia,” Digiworld Economic Journal 95(3): 17–40.Google Scholar
Pohlmann, Tim. 2017. “Empirical Study on Patenting and Standardization Activities at IEEE,” http://fair-standards.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/IPlytics_2017_Patenting-and-standardization-activities-at-IEEE.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishnan, Shankar and Scipio, Philip. 2016. “Big three in credit ratings still dominate business,” Reuters. May 4.Google Scholar
Rangarajan, Anusuya, Elixabeth A. Bihn, Robert B. Gravani, Donna L. Scott, and Marvin P. Pritts. 1997. “Food Safety Begins on the Farm: Reduce Microbial Contamination with Good Agricultural Practices” (pamphlet), Good Agricultural Practices Program, Cornell University. Archived at http://perma.cc/GH48-23H3Google Scholar
Rapoport, Michael. 2017. “Judge Says PricewaterhouseCoopers Was Negligent in Colonial Bank Failure,” Wall Street Journal. December 31.Google Scholar
Ratliff, James and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. 2013. “The Use and Threat of Injunctions in the RAND Context,” Journal of Competition Law & Economics 9(1): 1–22.Google Scholar
Rees, Joseph V. 1996. Hostages of Each Other: The Transformation of Nuclear Safety Since Three Mile Island. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, Alan. 2005. “Political Responses to the Enron Scandal” in Niskanen, William, ed., After Enron: Lessons for Public Policy, Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, pp. 18–44.Google Scholar
Ribstein, Larry. 2010. The Rise of the Uncorporation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ricknäs, Mikael. 2010. “Danish Parliament Sets Rules for Open Document Formats,” PCWorld, www.pcworld.com/article/188153/article.htmlGoogle Scholar
Rockwell, Holly. 1992. “Product Liability of Endorser, Trade Association, Certifier, or Similar Party Who Expresses Approval of Product,” American Law Reports 5: 431.Google Scholar
Romano, Roberta. 1998. “Empowering Investors: A Market Approach to Securities Regulation,” Yale Law Journal 107(5): 2359–430.Google Scholar
Ross, Laurence H. 1980. Settled Out of Court: The Social Process of Insurance Claims Adjustment, 2nd ed. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rubin, Jonathan J. 2007. “Patents, Antitrust, and Rivalry in Standard-Setting,” Rutgers Law Journal 38: 509.Google Scholar
Russell, Andrew. 2006. “Rough Consensus and Running Code’ and the Internet-OSI Standards War,” Annals of the History of Computing 28: 48.Google Scholar
Rysman, Marc and Simcoe, Timothy. 2008. “Patents and the Performance of Voluntary Standard-Setting Organizations,” Management Science 54(11): 1920.Google Scholar
Salter, Liora. 1988. Mandated Science: Science and Scientists in the Making of Standards. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishing.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 1992a. “Computer Programs, User Interfaces, and Section 102(b) of the Copyright Act of 1976: A Critique of Lotus v. Paperback”, Law and Contemporary Problems 55(2): 311–53. Republished in revised form. 1992. High Technology Law Journal 6(2): 209–70.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 1992b. “Some New Kinds of Authorship Made Possible by Computers and Some Intellectual Property Questions They Raise,” University of Pittsburgh Law Review 53(3): 685–704.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 2007. “Why Copyright Excludes Systems and Processes From the Scope of Its Protection,” Texas Law Review 85(7): 1921–78.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 2016a. “Functional Compilations,” Houston Law Review 54(2): 321–70.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 2016b. “Functionality and Expression in Computer Programs: Refining the Tests for Software Copyright Infringement,” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 31(2): 1215–300.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela. 2016c. “Reconceptualizing Copyright’s Merger Doctrine,” Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA 63(3): 417–70.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela and Asay, Clark D.. 2018. “Saving Software’s Fair Use Future,” Harvard Journal of Law & Technology. 31: 535.Google Scholar
Samuelson, Pamela, Davis, Randall, Kapor, Mitchell D., and Reichman, J. H.. 1994. “A Manifesto Concerning the Legal Protection of Computer Programs,” Columbia Law Review 94(8): 2308–41.Google Scholar
Satyanarayana, J. 2004. e-Government: The Science of the Possible, PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.Google Scholar
Scallan, Elaine, Robert M. Hoekstra, Frederick J. Angulo, Robert V. Tauxe, Marc-Alain Widdowson, Sharon L. Roy, Jeffrey L. Jones, and Patricia M. Griffin et al. 2011. “Foodborne Illness Acquired in the United States – Unspecified Agents,” Emerging Infectious Diseases 17(1): 16–22.Google Scholar
Schechter, Frank I. 1927. “The Rational Basis of Trademark Protection,” Harvard Law Review 40(6): 813–33.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm. 2005. The Constitution of Private Governance: Product Standards in the Regulation of Integrating Markets, International Studies in the Theory of Private Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm. 2011. “The Empire’s Drains : Sources of Legal Recognition of Private Standardization Under the TBT Agreement” in Joerges, C. and Petersmann, E.-U., eds., Constitutionalism, Multilevel Trade Governance and International Economic Law. Oxford: Hart Publishing.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm. 2013a. “Rules of Recognition: A Legal Constructivist Approach to Transnational Private Regulation” in Jurcys, Paulius, Kjaer, Paul F., and Yatsunami, Ren, Regulatory Hybridization in the Transnational Sphere. Leiden, Netherlands: Brill Online.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm. 2013b. “The New Approach to the New Approach: The Juridification of Harmonised Standards in EU Law,” Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 20(4): 521–33.Google Scholar
Schepel, Harm and Falke, Josef. 2000. Legal Aspects of Standardisation in the Member States of the EC and EFTA, Volume 1: Comparative Report. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter. 1994. “Tort Liability to Those Injured by Negligent Accreditation Decisions,” Law and Contemporary Problems 57(4): 185–97.Google Scholar
Schuck, Peter. 2014. Why Government Fails So Often: And How It Can Do Better. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Colin. 2010. “Standard-setting in Regulatory Regimes” in Baldwin, R., Cave, M., and Lodge, M., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Regulation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Colin. 2012. “Regulating Everything: From Mega- to Meta-Regulation,” Administration 60: 57–85.Google Scholar
Seely, Oliver. 1998. “Public Domain Databases in the Sciences.” www5.csudh.edu/oliver/pubdomdb.htmGoogle Scholar
Seifter, Miriam. 2018. “Further from the People? The Puzzle of State Administration,” New York University Law Review 93(1): 107–74.Google Scholar
Shah, Rajiv and Kesan, Jay. 2007. An Empirical Study of Open Standards. Draft, on file with author.Google Scholar
Shah, Rajiv and Kesan, Jay. 2009. “Running Code as Part of an Open Standards Policy,” 14 First Monday.Google Scholar
Shah, Rajiv and Kesan, Jay. 2012. “Lost in Translation: Interoperability Issues for Open Standards,” I/S: A Journal of Law and Policy for the Information Society 8(1): 119.Google Scholar
Shah, , Rajiv, Jay Kesan, and Andrew Kennis 2007. “Lessons for Open Standard Policies: A Case Study of the Massachusetts Experience,” International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl and Varian, Hal. 1998. Information Rules: A Strategic Guide to the Network Economy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Carl. 1983. “Premiums for High Quality Products as Returns to Reputation,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 98(4): 659–79.Google Scholar
Shekhar, Varun. 2010. “Produce Exceptionalism: Examining the Leafy Greens Marketing Agreement and Its Ability to Improve Food Safety,” Journal of Food Law & Policy 6: 267–309.Google Scholar
Simcoe, Timothy. 2012. “Standard Setting Committees : Consensus Governance for Shared Technology Platforms,” American Economic Review 102(1): 305.Google Scholar
Soon, Adi. 2013. “‘Swiss Made’ Now Means More Swiss Made,” Blog to Watch, May 15, 2013.Google Scholar
Spence, Michael. 1973. “Job Market Signaling,” The Quarterly Journal of Economics 87(3): 355–74.Google Scholar
Spindler, Gerald. 1998. “Market Processes, Standardisation and Tort Law,” European Law Journal 4(3): 316–36.Google Scholar
Staiger, R. and Sykes, A.. 2011. “International Trade, National Treatment and Domestic Regulation,” Journal of Legal Studies 40: 149.Google Scholar
Stango, Victor. 2004. “The Economics of Standards Wars,” Review of Network Econ. 3: 1.Google Scholar
Stoll, Thimo Pascal. 2014. “Are You Still in? – The Impact of Licensing Requirements on the Composition of Standards Setting Organizations,” Max Planck Institute for Innovation & Competition Research Paper No. 14–18. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2535735Google Scholar
Strauss, Peter L. 2013. “Private Standards Organizations and Public Law,” William & Mary Bill of Rights Journal 22(2): 497–561.Google Scholar
Stuart, Diana. 2010. “Science, Standards, and Power: New Food Safety Governance in California,” Journal of Rural Social Sciences 25(3): 111–40.Google Scholar
Stuurman, Cees and Wijnands, H.S.A.. 2000. “Legal Aspects of Standardisation in the Netherlands” in Schepel, H. and Falke, J., eds., Legal Aspects of Standardisation in the Member States of the EC and EFTA, Volume 2: Country Reports. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
Suchman, Marc C. 1995. “Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches,” The Academy of Management Review 20(3): 571–610.Google Scholar
Swann, G.M. Peter. 2000. The Economics of Standardization: Final Report for Standards and Technical Regulations Directorate Department of Trade and Industry. Manchester Business School, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Swann, Cavin, Temple, Paul, and Shrumer, Mark. 1996. “Standards and Trade Performance: the UK Experience,” Economic Journal 106(438): 1297–313.Google Scholar
Sykes, Alan O. 1999. “The (Limited) Role of Regulatory Harmonization in International Goods and Services Markets,” Journal of International Economic Law 1: 49.Google Scholar
Tanner, Bob. 2000. “Independent assessment by third-party certification bodies,” Food Control 11: 415–17.Google Scholar
Taulli, Tom. 2015. “Why All the ‘Open Source’ Innovation?,” Forbes, December 23, 2015.Google Scholar
Taylor, Michael. 2014. “We’re Reinventing Ourselves to Keep Your Food Safe, FDA Voice.” https://blogs.fda.gov/fdavoice/index.php/2014/05/were-reinventing-ourselves-to-keep-your-food-safe/Google Scholar
Thompson, Richard. 2011. “Nooks and Crannies,” The Guardian. www.theguardian.com/notesandqueries/query/0,5753,-18959,00.htmlGoogle Scholar
Tiller, Rob. 2008. A Reader’s Guide to the Firestar Settlement. Red Hat Blog. www.redhat.com/en/blog/a-readers-guide-to-the-firestar-settlementGoogle Scholar
Tsilas, Nicos L. 2005. “The Threat to Innovation, Interoperability, and Government Procurement Options From Recently Proposed Definitions of ‘Open Standards’,” International Journal of Communications Law and Policy 10: 8.Google Scholar
Van den Bossche, P. 2008. The Law and Policy of the World Trade Organization – Text, Cases and Materials, 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Van Gestel, Rob and Micklitz, Hans-W.. 2013. “European Integration through Standardization: How judicial review is breaking down the club house of private standardization bodies,” Common Market Law Review, 50(1): 145–81.Google Scholar
Van Harten, Herman and Nauta, Thomas. 2013. “Towards Horizontal Direct Effect for the Free Movement Of Goods? – Comment on Fra.bo,” European Law Review 38(5): 677–94.Google Scholar
Van Leeuwen, B.J. 2013. “From Status to Impact, and the Role of National Legislation: The Application of Article 34 TFEU to a Private Certification Organisation in Fra.bo,” European Journal of Risk Regulation 4(3): 405–08.Google Scholar
Veillard, Daniel. 2012. Standards, the Kernel and Open Source. http://veillard.com/Talks/CLKBeijing2012.pdfGoogle Scholar
Verbruggen, Paul and Havinga, Tetty, eds. 2017. Hybridization of Food Governance: Trends, Types and Results. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, Paul. 2017a. “Private Regulatory Standards in Commercial Contracts: Questions of Compliance. In Contract and Regulation” in Brownsword, R., van Gestel, R., and Micklitz, H.W.., eds., A Handbook on New Methods of Law Making in Private Law. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, Paul. 2017b. “The Impact of Free Movement of Goods and Services on Private Law Rights and Remedies” in Micklitz, H.W., and Sieburgh, C., eds., Primary EU Law and Private Law Concepts. Cambridge, UK: Intersentia.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, Paul. 2019. “Good Governance of Private Standardization and the Role of Tort Law,” European Review of Private Law 27(2): 319–52.Google Scholar
Verbruggen, Paul and Van Leeuwen, Barend. 2018. “The Liability of Notified Bodies under the EU’s New Approach: The Implications of the PIP Breast Impants Case (C-219/15),” European Law Review 43(3): 394–409.Google Scholar
Volokh, Alexander. 2014. “The New Private-Regulation Skepticism: Due Process, Non-Delegation, and Antitrust Challenges,” Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy 37: 931–1007.Google Scholar
Volpato, Annalisa. 2017. “A Court of Justice The harmonized standards before the ECJ: James Elliott Construction,” Common Market Law Review 54(2): 591–603.Google Scholar
Von Bogdandy, A. 2012. “The European Lesson for International Democracy: The Significance of Articles 9–12 EU Treaty for International Organizations,” European Journal of International Law 23(2): 315.Google Scholar
Weatherill, Stephen. 2013. EU Consumer Law and Policy, 2nd ed. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Webster, Nadaline. 2017. “8 Things to Know About the New EU Certification Marks,” TrademarkNow, October 12, 2017. www.trademarknow.com/blog/8-things-to-know-about-the-new-eu-certification-marksGoogle Scholar
Weil, Nancy. 2005. Group Urges IT Open Standards in Report, CIO, September 12, 2005, www.cio.com.au/article/139358/group_urges_it_open_standards_report/Google Scholar
Werbach, Kevin. 2009. “Higher Standards Regulation in the Network Age,” Harvard Journal of Law and Technology 23: 179.Google Scholar
West, Joel. 2004. “What are Open Standards? Implications for Adoption, Competition and Policy.” Standards and Public Policy conference, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.98.786&rep=rep1&type=pdfGoogle Scholar
West, Joel. 2005. “The Economic Realities of Open Standards: Black, White and Many Shades of Gray” in Greenstein, Shane and Stango, Victor, eds., Standards and Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wilson, J. 2002. “Standards, Regulation and Trade : WTO Rules and Developing Country Concerns” in Hoekman, B., Mattoo, A., and English, R., eds., Development, Trade and the WTO: A Handbook. The World Bank.Google Scholar
Wolff, Adam. 2017. “Relicensing React, Jest, Flow, and Immutable.js.” Facebook Code. https://code.facebook.com/posts/300798627056246/relicensing-react-jest-flow-and-immutable-js/Google Scholar
Wood, G.B. 1961. “Marketing Agreements and Orders – Without Production Controls,” in Increasing Understanding of Public Problems and Policies. Chicago: Farm Foundation.Google Scholar
Xiao, Mo. 2010. “Is quality accreditation effective? Evidence from the childcare market,” International Journal of Industrial Organization 28(6): 708–21.Google Scholar
Yue, Lori Qingyan and Ingram, Paul. 2012. “Industry Self-Regulation as a Solution to the Reputation Commons Problem: The Case of the New York Clearing House Association” in Pollock, Timothy G. and Barnett, Michael L., eds., The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Reputation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhe, Jin, Zhe, Ginger, and Kato, Andrew. 2006. “Price, Quality and Reputation: Evidence from an Online Experiment,” RAND Journal of Economics 37(4): 983–1004.Google Scholar
Zipursky, Benjamin C. 2009. “Foreseeability in Breach, Duty, and Proximate Cause,” Wake Forest Law Review 44(5): 1247–75.Google Scholar