Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-qxdb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T08:30:37.379Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 27 - Antepartum Hemorrhage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 September 2017

By
Jessica R. Jackson  and
Julie DeCesare
Edited by
Martin Olsen
Martin Olsen
Affiliation:
East Tennessee State University
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Obstetric Care , pp. 245 - 251
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Krishna, A, Chandraharan, E. Management of massive obstetric hemorrhage. Current Women’s Health Review. 2011; 7: 136–142.Google Scholar
Bhandari, S, Raja, EA, Shetty, A, Bhattacharya, S. Maternal and perinatal consequences of antepartum haemorrhage of unknown origin. BJOG. 2014; 121 (1): 44–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Green top guideline number 63, 1st ed. Antepartum Hemorrhage. 2001; p. 1–23.Google Scholar
King Edward Hospital for Women Perth, Australia. Antepartum Hemorrhage. Clinical Guidelines: Obstetrics and Midwifery. 2015; B2.3: 1–12.Google Scholar
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Committee Opinion. Placenta Accreta. No 529 July 2012, reaffirmed 2015.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom, Hauth, Rouse, Spong, eds. Williams Obstetrics, 23rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2010.Google Scholar
Silver, R. Abnormal placentation: placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accrete. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126 (3): 654–668.Google Scholar
Getahum, D, Oyelese, Y, Salihu, HM, Ananth, CV. Previous cesarean delivery and risks of placenta previa and placental abruption. Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 771–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom, Hauth, Rouse, Spong, eds. Williams Obstetrics, 23rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2010.Google Scholar
Ananth, CV, Wilcox, AJ, Savitz, DA, Bowes, WA, Luther ER. Effect of maternal age and parity on the risk of uteroplacental bleeding disorders in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 511–516.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Macones, GA, Sehdev, HM, Parry, S, Morgan, MA, Berlin, JA. The association between maternal cocaine use and placenta previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 177: 1071–1078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ananth, CV, Demisse, K, Smulian, JC, Vintzileos, AM. Placenta previa in singleton and twin births in the United States, 1989 through 1998: A comparison of risk factor profiles and associated conditions. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188: 275–281.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom, Hauth, Rouse, Spong, eds. Williams Obstetrics, 23rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2010.Google Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Bhide, A. Ultrasound in placental disorders. Best Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014: 28: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Silver, R. Abnormal placentation: Placenta previa, vasa previa, and placenta accrete. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126 (3): 654–668.Google Scholar
Becker, RH, Vonk, R, Mende, BC, Ragosch, V, Entezami, M. The relevance of placental location at 20–23 gestational weeks for the prediction of placenta previa at delivery: Evaluation of 8650 cases. Ultrasound Obset Gynecol. 2001; 17: 496–501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohari, KS, Roman, AS, Fox, NS, Feinberg, J, Saltzman, DH, Klauser, CK, Rebarber, A. Persistence of placenta previa in twin gestations based on gestational age at sonographic detection. J Ultrasound Med. 2012; 31 (7): 985–989.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dashe, JS, McIntire, DD, Ramus, RM, Santos-Ramos, R, Twickler, DM. Persistence of placenta previa according to gestational age at ultrasound detection. Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 99: 692–697.Google Scholar
Leerentveld, RA, Gilberts, EC, Arnold, MJ, Wladimiroff, JW. Accuracy and safety of transvaginal sonographic placental localization. Obstet Gynecol. 1990; 11: 257–61.Google Scholar
Timor-Tritsch, IE, Yunis, RA. Confirming the safety of transvaginal sonography in patients suspected of having placenta previa. Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 81: 742–744.Google Scholar
Ghourab, S. Third-trimester transvaginal ultrasonography in placenta previa: does the shape of the lower placental edge predict clinical outcome? Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2001;18:103–108.Google Scholar
ACOG committee opinion number 560: Medically-indicated late-preterm and early-term deliveries. Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121 (4): 908–910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vintzileos, A, Ananth, C, Smulian, J. Using ultrasound in the clinical management of placental implantation abnormalities. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 4(S): S70–S77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.Committee Opinion. Placenta Accreta. No 529 July 2012, reaffirmed 2015.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Leveno, Bloom, Hauth, Rouse, Spong, eds. Williams Obstetrics, 23rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill. 2010.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, M. Etiology, clinical manifestations, and prediction of placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89 (6): 732–740.Google Scholar
Tikkanen, M. Etiology, clinical manifestations, and prediction of placental abruption. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2010; 89 (6): 732–740.Google Scholar
Glantz, C, Purnell, L. Clinical utility of sonography in the diagnosis and treatment of placental abruption. J Ultrasound Med. 2002; 32: 837–840.Google Scholar
Callen, P. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 5th ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 2008.Google Scholar
Elliott, JP, Gilpin, B, Strong, TH Jr, Finberg, HJ. Chronic abruption-oligohydramnios sequence. J Reprod Med. 1998; 43: 418–422.Google ScholarPubMed
Kobayashi, A, Minami, S, Tanizaki, Y, Shiro, M, Yamamato, M, et al. Adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes in patients with chronic–abruption oligohydraminos sequence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40 (6): 1618–1624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naftolin, F, Khudr, G, Benirschke, K, Hutchinson, DL. The syndrome of chronic abruptio placentae, hydrorrhea, and circumvallate placenta. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1973; 116: 347–350.Google Scholar
Kobayashi, A, Minami, S, Tanizaki, Y, Shiro, M, Yamamato, M, et al. Adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes in patients with chronic-abruption oligohydraminos sequence. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2014; 40 (6): 1618–1624.Google Scholar
Pitaphrom, A, Sukcharoen, N. Pregnancy outcomes in placental abruption. J Med Assoc Thal. 2006; 86 (10): 1572–1578.Google Scholar
Anath, CV, Demissie, K, Hanley, ML. Birth weight discordancy and adverse perinatal outcomes among twin gestations in the United States: The effect of placental abruption. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 188 (4): 954–960.Google Scholar
Sinkey, R, Odibo, A, Dasche, J. Society for maternal fetal medicine consult series #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213 (5): 615–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D’Antonio, F, Bhide, A. Ultrasound in placental disorders. Best Prac Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014: 28: 429–442.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sinkey, R, Odibo, A, Dasche, J. Society for maternal fetal medicine consult series #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213 (5): 615–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyelese, Y, Catanzarite, V, Prefumo, F, Lashley, S, Schachter, M, et al. Vasa previa: The impact of prenatal diagnosis on outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103 (5 Pt 1): 937–942.Google Scholar
Sinkey, R, Odibo, A, Dasche, J. Society for maternal fetal medicine consult series #37: Diagnosis and management of vasa previa. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 213 (5): 615–619.Google Scholar
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Practice bulletin number 4: Prevention of Rh D alloimmunization. May 1999, reaffirmed 2013.Google Scholar
The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstetric care consensus summary: Periviable birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126 (5): e82–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×