Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we investigated the evolution process and historical roots of citation analysis study by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS), which is an advanced research method recently introduced in the field of Scientometrics. Through analyzing the publication year and citation frequency of cited references in a knowledge domain, RPYS can identify the citation peak of such cited references. We collected 2543 articles including 56,392 references regarding citation analysis in SCI-E and SSCI databases between 1970 and July 2016 as our data source. Based on the RPYS method by the CRExplorer program, the results showed that the peak citation publication years by chronological order occurred in 1955, 1963, 1973, 1979, 1981, 1990, 2005 and 2008 in the field of citation analysis study. According to the overall distribution of peak citation publication years, the RPYS for citation analysis was divided into five time periods for the convenience of comparison in this paper: that is, before 1900, 1901–1950, 1951–1970, 1971–2000, and 2001–2016. Pre 1950, especially during the 1900s–1950s, before the citation analysis method was introduced, there were three rather high peak citation publication years, Lotka’s law and Bradford’s law laid the knowledge foundation for citation analysis. 1950s–1970s was the forming period of citation analysis, among the three citation peaks in this period, Garfield (Science 122(3159):1127–1128, 1955), Price (Von Der Studierstube Zur 7(3–6):443–458, 1963, Science 149:510–515, 1965), and Kessler (1963) established an important knowledge base for the formation of citation analysis study. 1971–2000 was a developing period of citation analysis. Document Co-citation Analysis and Author Co-citation Analysis methods laid the foundation of the development of citation analysis study. Since 2000, citation analysis study has been expanding rapidly. By the number of published papers and number of cited references with highly cited frequency, Garfield E., White H.D., Small H., MacRoberts M.H., Price D.D. have played an important role in promoting the evolution of citation analysis study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Which h-index?—A comparison of WoS, Scopus and Google Scholar. Scientometrics, 74(2), 257–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, A., Marx, W., Bornmann, L., & Mutz, R. (2014). On the origins and the historical roots of the Higgs boson research from a bibliometric perspective. European Physical Journal Plus, 129(6), 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L., Gallagher, A. L., & Krieger, D. (1990). Childrens use of an interactive catalog of science materials. Proceedings of the ASIS Annual Meetings, 27, 55–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Daniel, H. D. (2008). What do citation counts measure? A review of studies on citing behavior. Journal of Documentation, 64(1), 45–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornmann, L., & Marx, W. (2013). The proposal of a broadening of perspective in evaluative bibliometrics by complementing the times cited with a cited reference analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(1), 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyack, K. W., Klavans, R., & Borner, K. (2005). Mapping the backbone of science. Scientometrics, 64(3), 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, S. C. (1934). Sources of information on specific subjects. Engineering, 137, 85–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bradford, S. C. (1948). Documentation. London: Crosby Lockwood & Son.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brin, S., & Page, L. (1998). The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems, 30(1–7), 107–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. (2006). CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57, 359–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C., Ibekwe-SanJuan, F., & Hou, J. (2010). The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(7), 1386–1409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole, F. J., & Eales, N. B. (1917). The history of comparative anatomy: Part I.—A stastistical analysis of the literature. Science Progress, 11(44), 578–596.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comins, J. A., & Hussey, T. W. (2015a). Compressing multiple scales of impact detection by Reference Publication Year Spectroscopy. Journal of Informetrics, 9(3), 449–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comins, J. A., & Hussey, T. W. (2015b). Detecting seminal research contributions to the development and use of the global positioning system by reference publication year spectroscopy. Scientometrics, 104(2), 575–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Comins, J.A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2016). Identification of long-term concept-symbols among citations: Can documents be clustered in terms of common intellectual histories? http://arxiv.org/abs/1601.00288.

  • Cronin, B., Snyder, H. W., & Rosenbaum, H. (1998). Invoked on the web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(14), 1319–1328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1955). Citation indexes for science: A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. Science, 122(3159), 1127–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science technology and humanities. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2006). Citation indexes for science. A new dimension in documentation through association of ideas. International Journal of Epidemiology, 35(5), 1123–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicors: A survey . Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, P. L. K., & Gross, E. M. (1927). College libraries and chemical education. Science, 66, 386–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagstrom, W. O., & Selvin H. C. (1965). 2 Dimensions of cohesiveness in small-groups. Socimetry, 28(1), 30–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P. (1998). The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation, 54(2), 236–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kessler, M. M. (1963). Biblographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostoff, R. N. (1998). The use and misuse of citation analysis in research evaluation—comments on theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., Bornmann, L., Marx, W., & Milojević, S. (2014). Referenced publication years spectroscopy applied to iMetrics: Scientometrics. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 162–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipetz, B. A. (1965). Improvement of the selectivity of citation indexes to science litebature through inclusion of citation relationship indicatiors. American Documentation, 16(2), 81–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lotka, A. J. (1926). The frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy of Sciences, 16(12), 317–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (1989). Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 40(40), 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macroberts, M. H., & Macroberts, B. R. (2009). Problems of citation analysis: A study of uncited and seldom cited influences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(1), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, W., & Bornmann, L. (2014). Tracing the origin of a scientific legend by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS): The legend of the Darwin finches. Scientometrics, 99, 839–844.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marx, W., Bornmann, L., Barth, A., & Leydesdorff, L. (2014). Detecting the historical roots of research fields by reference publication year spectroscopy (RPYS). Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(4), 751–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mccain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: A technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R. K. (1965). Nurse-physician collaboration toward improved patient care. Observations. Papers. National Conference for Professional Nurses and Physicians, 2, 51–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Information Science and Knowledge Management, 57(1), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1961). The logic of scientific discovery (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. (1963). Little science, big science. Von Der Studierstube Zur, 7(3–6), 443–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. J. D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149, 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radicchi, F., Fortunato, S., & Castellano, C. (2008). Universality of citation distributions: Toward an objective measure of scientific impact. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105(45), 17268–17272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redner, S. (1998). How popular is your paper? An empirical study of the citation distribution. European Physical Journal B, 4(2), 131–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 24(24), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. C. (1981). Citation analysis. Library Trends, 30(1), 83–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thor, A., Marx, W., Leydesdorff, L., & Bornmann, L. (2016). Introducing cited references explorer: A program for reference publication year spectroscopy with cited references disambiguation. Journal of Informetrics, 10(1), 1–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & Griffith, B. C. (1981). Author cocitation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 32, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & Mccain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: An author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and Control, 8(3), 338–353.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71103022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Center of Science Technology and Society, Dalian University, Dalian, 116622, China

    Jianhua Hou

Authors
  1. Jianhua Hou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianhua Hou.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hou, J. Exploration into the evolution and historical roots of citation analysis by referenced publication year spectroscopy. Scientometrics 110, 1437–1452 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2206-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-2206-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation