Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a first approach to analyzing the factors that determine the citation characteristics of books. For this we use the Thomson Reuters’ book citation index, a novel multidisciplinary database launched in 2011 which offers bibliometric data on books. We analyze three possible factors which are considered to affect the citation impact of books: the presence of editors, the inclusion in series and the type of publisher. Also, we focus on highly cited books to see if these factors may affect them as well. We considered as highly cited books, those in the top 5 % of those most highly cited in the database. We define these three aspects and present results for four major scientific areas in order to identify differences by area (science, engineering and technology, social sciences and arts and humanities). Finally, we report differences for edited books and publisher type, however books included in series showed higher impact in two areas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aksnes, D. W. (2003). Characteristics of highly cited papers. Research Evaluation, 12(3), 159–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, E., & Larivière, V. (2009). History of the journal impact factor: Contingencies and consequences. Scientometrics, 79(3), 639–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Ilan, J. (2008). Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century —A review. Journal of Informetrics, 2(1), 1–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campanario, J. M., Carretero, J., Marangon, V., Molina, A., & Ros, G. (2011). Effect of the journal impact factor of the number and document type of citing records: a wide-scale study. Scientometrics, 87(1), 75–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale,NJ: Erlbaum.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 263–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (2009). Five decades of citation indexing. International Workshop for Scientometrics. Beijing, China. Retrieved May 30, 2013, from http://garfield.library.upenn.edu/papers/beijingchina2009.html.

  • Georgas, H., & Cullars, J. (2005). A citation study of the characteristics of the Linguistics Literature. College & Research Libraries, 66(6), 496–516.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorraiz, J., Purnell, P., & Glänzel, W. (2013). Opportunities and limitations of the book citation index. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(7), 1388–1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammarfelt, B. (2011). Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: Citation analysis of highly cited monographs. Scientometrics, 86(3), 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, D. (2004). The four literatures of social science. In H. F. Moed, W. Glänzel, & U. Schmoch (Eds.), Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems (pp. 473–496). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google books, Google scholar, and Scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambiotte, R., & Panzarasa, P. (2009). Communities, knowledge creation, and information diffusion. Journal of Informetrics, 3(3), 180–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327–1336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Felt, U. (2012). Edited volumes, monographs and book chapters in the Book Citation Index. Journal of Scientometric Research, 1(1), 28–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Rafols, I. (2009). A global map of science based on the ISI subject categories. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(2), 348–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linmans, A. J. M. (2010). Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link. Indicators for research evaluation based on citations, library findings and productivity measures. Scientometrics, 83(2), 337–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peritz, B. C. (1981). Citation characteristics in library science: Some further results from a bibliometric survey. Library Research, 3(1), 47–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang, R. (2008). Citation characteristics and intellectual acceptance of scholarly monographs. College & Research Libraries, 69(4), 356–369.

    Google Scholar 

  • Testa, J. (2010).The book selection process for the Book Citation Index in Web of Science. Retrieved June 3, 2013, from http://wokinfo.com/media/pdf/BKCI-SelectionEssay_web.pdf.

  • Torres-Salinas, D., & Moed, H. F. (2009). Library catalog analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study on published book titles in economics. Journal of Informetrics, 3(1), 9–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Jiménez-Contreras, E., & López-Cózar, D. (2012). Towards a ‘book publishers citation reports’. First approach using the ‘book citation index’. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 35(4), 615–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas, D., Rodríguez-Sánchez, R., Robinson-García, N., Fdez-Valdivia, J., & García, J. A. (2013a). Mapping citation patterns of book chapters in the book citation index. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 412–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Campanario, J. M. & Delgado López-Cózar, E. (2013b). Coverage, field specialization and impact of scientific publishers indexed in the ‘Book Citation Index’. Online Information Review, in press.

  • White, H., Boell, S. K., Yu, H., Davis, M., Wilson, C. S., & Cole, F. T. H. (2009). Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(6), 1083–1096.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuccala, A., & van Leeuwen, T. N. (2011). Book reviews in humanities research evaluations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1979–1991.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks are due to the anonymous referee for their helpful comments. Nicolás Robinson-García is currently supported by a FPU grant from the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad of the Spanish government. Bryan J. Robinson of the University of Granada Department of Translation and Interpreting revised the final version of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolás Robinson-García.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Torres-Salinas, D., Robinson-García, N., Cabezas-Clavijo, Á. et al. Analyzing the citation characteristics of books: edited books, book series and publisher types in the book citation index. Scientometrics 98, 2113–2127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1168-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-013-1168-4

Keywords

Navigation