Skip to main content
Log in

Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to explore the core and emerging knowledge of electronic commerce (e-commerce) research. Data was collected from the top six e-commerce journals from 2006–2010. A total of 1,064 electronic commerce related articles and 33,173 references were identified. There were 48 high value research articles identified using a citation and co-citation analysis. Using statistical analysis including factor analysis, multidimensional scaling, and cluster analysis, we identified five research areas: trust, technology acceptance and technology application, e-commerce task-related application, e-markets, and identity and evaluation. We also identified emerging core knowledge, information systems success. The findings of this study provide core knowledge and directions for researchers and practitioners interested in the electronic commerce field.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arakji, R., & Lang, K. (2010). Adoption and diffusion of business practice innovations: an evolutionary analysis. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(1), 145–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ba, S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Y. (1991). A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 295–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakos, J. Y. (1997). Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676–1692.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, I., Demirkan, H., Kannan, P. K., & Kauffman, R. J. (2010). Introduction to the special section: service science in electronic commerce. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 14(3), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R. W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgman, C. L. (1989). Bibliometrics and scholarly communication: editor’s introduction. Communication Research, 16(5), 583–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M. D. (2000). Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46(4), 563–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carte, T. A., & Russell, C. J. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, D. L., & McMillan, G. S. (2008). Identifying the “invisible colleges” of the industrial and labor relations review: a bibliometric approach. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 62(1), 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, M. K., Cheung, W., & Lai, V. S. (2005). Literature derived reference models for the adoption of online shopping. Information and Management, 42(4), 543–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C.-M., & Hung, S.-Y. (2004). Distinct journal preference of successful EC researchers: a citation analysis. Electronic Commerce Studies, 2(1), 1–18.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W., Marcolin, B., & Newsted, P. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claver, E., Gonzalez, R., & Llopis, J. (2000). An analysis of research in information systems (1981–1997). Information and Management, 37(4), 181–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocosila, M., & Archer, N. (2010). Adoption of mobile ICT for health promotion: an empirical investigation. Electronic Markets, 20(3–4), 241–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M. (1987). Mapping the intellectual structure of MIS, 1980–1985: a co-citation analysis. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 341–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Culnan, M., & Swanson, E. (1986). Research in management information systems, 1980–1984: points of work and reference. MIS Quarterly, 10(3), 289–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delone, W. H., & Mclean, E. R. (2004). Measuring e-commerce success: applying the Delone and Mclean information systems success model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(1), 31–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H. M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003a). Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003b). Inexperience and experience with online stores: the importance of tam and trust. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 50(3), 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinze, N., & Hu, Q. (2006). The evolution of corporate web presence: a longitudinal study of large American companies. International Journal of Information Management, 26(4), 313–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, C. H., & Yang, C. (2011). The intellectual development of the technology acceptance model: a co-citation analysis. International Journal of Information Management, 31(2), 128–136.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hung, S., Hung, W., Kang, T., & Tang, K. (2009). Publication productivitiy of IS researchers in the Pacific Asia region: an analysis of DSS and I and M journals (2003–2007). Pacific Asia Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(2), 38–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvenpaa, S. L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 45–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2), 199–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jasperson, J., Carter, P. E., & Zmud, R. W. (2005). A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems. MIS Quarterly, 29(3), 525–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jukic, N., Jukic, B., Meamber, L., & Nezlek, G. (2002). Implementing polyinstantiation as a strategy for electronic commerce customer relationship management. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(2), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E., Agarwal, R., & Angst, C. M. (2006). Reconceptualizing compatability beliefs in technology acceptance research. MIS Quarterly, 30(4), 781–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, M. L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. J., & Walden, E. A. (2001). Economics and electronic commerce: survey and directions for research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 5(4), 5–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kousha, K., Thelwall, M., & Rezaie, S. (2011). Assessing the citation impact of books: the role of Google books, Google scholar, and scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(11), 2147–2164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. M., Hwang, T., & Kim, J. (2007). An analysis of diversity in electronic commerce research. International Journal of Electronic Commerce archive, 12(1), 31–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., & Larsen, K. R. T. (2003). The technology acceptance model: past, present, and the future. Communications of the AIS, 12(Article 50), 752–780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Vaughan, L. (2006). Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: extending ACA to the web environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 57(12), 1616–1628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T., Wang, Y., & Tsai, C. (2010). Trending and mapping the intellectual structure of social behavior studies: a study of the social behavior and personality journal. Social Behavior and Personality: An International Journal, 38(9), 1229–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, P., Romans, D., & Curtis, A. (2004). Global journal prestige and supporting disciplines: a scientometric study of information systems journals. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 5(2), 29–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCain, K. W. (1990). Mapping authors in intellectual space: a technical overview. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 41(6), 433–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKinney, V., & Yoon, K. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKnight, D. H., Cummings, L. L., & Chervany, N. L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, G. S. (2008). Mapping the invisible colleges of R and D management. R and D Management, 38(1), 69–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. M., & Hunt, S. D. (1994). The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing. The Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 20–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ngai, E., & Wat, F. (2002). A literature review and classification of electronic commerce research. Information and Management, 39(5), 415–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orlikowski, W. J., & Lacono, C. S. (2001). Research commentary: desperately seeking the ‘IT’ in it research—a call to theorizing the it artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlou, P. A., & Gefen, D. (2005). Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 372–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pilkington, A., & Meredith, J. (2009). The evolution of the intellectual structure of operations management 1980–2006: a citation/co-citation analysis. Journal of Operations Management, 27(3), 185–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, D. (1965). Networks of scientific papers. Science, 149(3683), 510–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Rodriguez, A., & Ruiz-Navarro, J. (2004). Changes in the intellectual structure of strategic management research: a bibliometric study of the strategic management journal, 1980–2000. Strategic Management Journal, 25(10), 981–1004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, R., & Zuccala, A. (2004). A classification of author co-citations: definitions and search strategies. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 55(6), 513–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rutner, S., Gibson, B., & Williams, S. (2003). The impacts of the integrated logistics systems on electronic commerce and enterprise resource planning systems. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(2), 83–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schildt, H., Zahra, S., & Sillanpaa, A. (2006). Scholarly communities in entrepreneurship research: a co-citation analysis. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(3), 399–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sircar, S., Nerur, S., & Mahapatra, R. (2001). Revolution or evolution? A comparison of object-oriented and structured systems development methods. MIS Quarterly, 25(4), 457–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H. (1973). Co citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, H., & Griffith, B. C. (1974). The structure of scientific literatures I: identifying and graphing specialties. Science Studies, 4(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, K. (2003). Trust transfer on the world wide web. Organization Science, 14(1), 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tight, M. (2008). Higher education research as tribe, territory and/or community: a co-citation analysis. Higher Education, 55(5), 593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F., Delone, W. H., Mclean, E. R., et al. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, M. R., & Nevo, S. (2006). Development and validation of a perceptual instrument to measure e-commerce performance. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 10(2), 123–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Archer, N. P., & Zheng, W. (2006). An exploratory study of electronic marketplace adoption: a multiple perspective view. Electronic Markets, 16(4), 337–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S., Zheng, S., Xu, L., Li, D., & Meng, H. (2008). A literature review of electronic marketplace research: themes, theories and an integrative framework. Information Systems Frontiers, 10(5), 555–571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: overview and defense. In Christine L. Borgman (Ed.), Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics (pp. 84–106). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D. (2003). Author cocitation analysis and Pearson’s r. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(13), 1250–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. D., & McCain, K. W. (1998). Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(4), 327–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wixom, B. H., & Todd, P. A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, B., & Benbasat, I. (2007). E-commerce product recommendation agents: use, characteristics, and impact. MIS Quarterly, 31(1), 137–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., & Wu, J. (2007). Review and prospect of relationship marketing: a citation analysis. Contemporary Management Research, 3(3), 267–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, B., & Liu, H. (2010). A SWOT analysis on the e-commerce of Chinese foreign trade. In: International conference on internet technology and applications on 20–22 Aug 2010 (pp. 1–4). Hangzhou: Zhejiang University of Technology.

  • Zwass, V. (1996). Electronic commerce: structures and issues. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 1(1), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, V. (2003). Electronic commerce and organizational innovation: aspects and opportunities. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 7–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwass, V. (2010). Co-creation: toward a taxonomy and an integrated research perspective. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 15(1), 11–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author appreciates Mr. Kang for his help on data collection and analysis. A previous version of this paper had presented in the PACIS 2011.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yogesh K. Dwivedi.

Appendices

Appendix 1

The hierarchical framework of electronic commerce (Zwass 1996) and keywords

Level

Function

Keywords

7

Electronic market places and electronic hierarchies

Auction, B2B e-commerce, B2B marketplaces, competitive strategy, consumer behavior, customer relationship management, customer satisfaction, electronic mall, marketing, market intermediaries, market structure, mobile commerce, personalization, pricing, shopping, supply chain management, trust

6

Products and systems

Banking, collaboration, digital content, digital goods, digital music, electronic payment systems, information system, interorganizational information systems, interorganizational systems, MP3, on-line music, on-line video game, open-source software, recommender systems, service

5

Enabling services

Agents, artificial agents, authentication, cash, copyright, decision support, digital libraries, digital rights management, E-mail, enabling services, intelligent agents, mondex, smart-cards, software agents, web site traffic, web traffic

4

Secure messaging

Electronic data interchange, electronic payments, information security, information technology security, internet security, message management, payment method, privacy, security, security breach announcements, security control, security semantics, excess security

3

Hypermedia/multimedia object management

Data mining, information retrieval, Java, multimedia, ontologies, programming languages, semantic web, software development, technology adoption, web interface, web site, web site design, web site domain, web technologies, world wide web, XML

2

Public and private communication utilities

2G, 2.5G, 3G, 3.5G, 4G, bluetooth, cable modem, DSL, ethernet, mobile internet, mobile technology, network structure, Wi-Fi, WiMax, RFID

1

Wide-area telecommunications infrastructure

Cable, coaxial cable, fiber, fiber optic, hybrid fiber coax, infrared waves, information system infrastructures, lightwave, microwave, millimeter waves, radio, satellite, twisted pair, wireless infrastructure

Appendix 2

Publications with high citation

A1. Davis, F. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340.

A2. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G., Davis, F., Delone, W.H., Mclean, E.R., Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B., Podsakoff, P.M., & Chin, W. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.

A3. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D.W. (2003a). Trust and tam in online shopping: an integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90.

A4. McKnight, D., Choudhury, V., & Kacmar, C. (2002). Developing and validating trust measures for e-commerce: an integrative typology. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 334–359.

A5. Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.

A6. Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B, Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

A7. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

A8. Ba, S., & Pavlou, P.A. (2002). Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 243–268.

A9. Pavlou, P.A., & Gefen, D. (2004). Building effective online marketplaces with institution-based trust. Information Systems Research, 15(1), 37–59.

A10. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

A11. Delone, W.H., & Mclean, E.R. (1992). Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 60–95.

A12. Bakos, J.Y. (1997). Reducing buyer search costs: implications for electronic marketplaces. Management Science, 43(12), 1676–1692.

A13. Chin, W., Marcolin, B., & Newsted, P. (2003). A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study. Information Systems Research, 14(2), 189–217.

A14. Jarvis, C.B., MacKenzie, S.B., & Podsakoff, P.M. (2003). A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research. Journal of Consumer Rresearch, 30(2), 199–218.

A15. Malone, T.W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R.I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497.

A16. Mayer, R.C., Davis, J.H., & Schoorman, F.D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709–734.

A17. Brynjolfsson, E., & Smith, M.D. (2000). Frictionless commerce? A comparison of internet and conventional retailers. Management Science, 46(4), 563–585.

A18. Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

A19. Podsakoff, P.M., & Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), Winter 86, 531–543.

A20. Moore, G., & Benbasat, I. (1991). Development of an instrument to measure the perceptions of adopting an information technology innovation. Information Systems Research, 2(3), 192–222.

A21. Delone, W.H., & Mclean, E.R. (2003). The Delone and Mclean model of information systems success: a ten-year update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9–30.

A22. Taylor, S., & Todd, P.A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.

A23. Sambamurthy, V., Bharadwaj, A., & Grover, V. (2003). Shaping agility through digital options: reconceptualizing the role of information technology in contemporary firms. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 237–263.

A24. Koufaris, M. (2002). Applying the technology acceptance model and flow theory to online consumer behavior. Information Systems Research, 13(2), 205–223.

A25. Pavlou, P.A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.

A26. Bhattacherjee, A. (2001). Understanding information systems continuance: an expectation-confirmation model. MIS Quarterly, 25(3), 351–370.

A27. McKnight, D.H., Cummings, L.L., & Chervany, N.L. (1998). Initial trust formation in new organizational relationships. Academy of Management Review, 23(3), 473–490.

A28. Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flies when you’re having fun: cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.

A29. Benbasat, I., & Zmud, R.W. (2003). The identity crisis within the IS discipline: defining and communicating the discipline’s core properties. MIS Quarterly, 27(2), 183–194.

A30. Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W., & Chervany, N.L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.

A31. Doney, P.M., & Cannon, J.P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. The Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–51.

A32. Katz, M.L., & Shapiro, C. (1985). Network externalities, competition, and compatibility. The American Economic Review, 75(3), 424–440.

A33. Armstrong, J.S., & Overton, T.S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, 14(3), 396–402.

A34. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., & Vitale, M. (2000). Consumer trust in an internet store. Information Technology and Management, 1(1), 45–71.

A35. Bharadwaj, A. (2000). A resource-based perspective on information technology capability and firm performance: an empirical investigation. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 169–196.

A36. Klein, H., & Myers, M. (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 23(1), 67–93.

A37. Venkatesh, V., & Morris, M. (2000). Why don’t men ever stop to ask for directions? Gender, social influence, and their role in technology acceptance and usage behavior. MIS Quarterly, 24(1), 115–139.

A38. Carte, T.A., & Russell, C.J. (2003). In pursuit of moderation: nine common errors and their solutions. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 479–501.

A39. Diamantopoulos, A., & Winklhofer, H.M. (2001). Index construction with formative indicators: an alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 269–277.

A40. Orlikowski, W.J., & Lacono, C.S. (2001). Research commentary: desperately seeking the ‘it’ in it research—a call to theorizing the it artifact. Information Systems Research, 12(2), 121–134.

A41. Pavlou, P.A., & Gefen, D. (2005). Psychological contract violation in online marketplaces: antecedents, consequences, and moderating role. Information Systems Research, 16(4), 372–399.

A42. Wixom, B.H., & Todd, P.A. (2005). A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 85–102.

A43. Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

A44. Bhattacherjee, A. (2002). Individual trust in online firms: scale development and initial test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(1), 211–241.

A45. Lee, M., & Turban, E. (2001). A trust model for consumer internet shopping. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 6(1), 75–91.

A46. McKinney, V., & Yoon, K. (2002). The measurement of web-customer satisfaction: an expectation and disconfirmation approach. Information Systems Research, 13(3), 296–315.

A47. Choudhury, V., & Sabherwal, R. (2003). Portfolios of control in outsourced software development projects. Information Systems Research, 14(3), 291–314.

A48. Bakos, J.Y. (1991). A strategic analysis of electronic marketplaces. MIS Quarterly, 15(3), 295–310.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shiau, WL., Dwivedi, Y.K. Citation and co-citation analysis to identify core and emerging knowledge in electronic commerce research. Scientometrics 94, 1317–1337 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0807-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-012-0807-5

Keywords

Navigation