Elsevier

Cellular Signalling

Volume 22, Issue 5, May 2010, Pages 728-736
Cellular Signalling

Review
Viagra for your synapses: Enhancement of hippocampal long-term potentiation by activation of beta-adrenergic receptors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.12.004Get rights and content

Abstract

Beta-adrenergic receptors (β-ARs) critically modulate long-lasting synaptic plasticity and long-term memory storage in the mammalian brain. Synaptic plasticity is widely believed to mediate memory storage at the cellular level. Long-term potentiation (LTP) is one type of synaptic plasticity that has been linked to memory storage. Activation of β-ARs can enhance LTP and facilitate long-term memory storage. Interestingly, many of the molecular signaling pathways that are critical for β-adrenergic modulation of LTP mirror those required for the persistence of memory. In this article, we review the roles of signaling cascades and translation regulation in enabling β-ARs to control expression of long-lasting LTP in the rodent hippocampus. These include the cyclic-AMP/protein kinase-A (cAMP–PKA) and extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase cascades, two key pathways known to link transmitter receptors with translation regulation. Future research directions are discussed, with emphasis on defining the roles of signaling complexes (e.g. PSD-95) and glutamatergic receptors in controlling the efficacy of β-AR modulation of LTP.

Introduction

A major goal of neuroscience research is to determine how enduring memories are made. Such knowledge would enhance therapies for memory disorders and illuminate many key brain functions that rely on enduring memories. Activity-induced changes in synaptic strength (“synaptic plasticity”) are widely believed to underlie memory storage at the cellular level [1], [2]. Research has established the principle that synaptic plasticity is critical for associative learning and long-term memory [3], [4]. In the mammalian hippocampus, a brain structure critical for making new memories, one form of synaptic plasticity, called “long-term potentiation” (LTP) [5], has been linked to spatial and contextual learning and memory [1], [6]. LTP is an activity-dependent increase in excitatory synaptic strength that can last for several hours in isolated brain slice preparations and up to a year in intact animals [7], [8]. Many key signaling requirements for LTP (e.g. NMDA receptors, protein kinase-A, calcium-dependent protein kinases) mirror those needed for memory storage in the mammalian brain [6], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Many manipulations that modify LTP also alter memory expression. Importantly, LTP-like changes in synaptic efficacy can occur in behaving animals as they learn [4]. Since its discovery by Tim Bliss and Terje Lomo [5], LTP has become the leading candidate synaptic mechanism for memory storage in the mammalian brain.

Many neuromodulatory transmitters control the endurance of LTP and memory. One neuromodulator that can significantly enhance hippocampal LTP stability is noradrenaline (NA). NA fibers originate mainly in the locus coeruleus (LC) [16]. LC projects widely throughout the forebrain, providing dense innervation to the hippocampus, amygdala, and thalamus [16]. As such, NA can influence many key brain functions such as attention, arousal, sleep, learning, and memory. The hippocampus is richly innervated by noradrenergic fibers from the LC, and endogenous release of NA can induce persistent synaptic plasticity [17], [18]. Interestingly, hippocampus-dependent memory is impaired following reduction of NA or after blockade of β-ARs [19], [20]. In the hippocampus, NA binds to β-ARs to enhance the endurance of LTP and promote stability of memories. However, the signaling mechanisms that enable β-ARs to enhance the longevity of LTP are unclear. Because LTP has been strongly correlated with memory storage, understanding how β-ARs modulate the persistence of LTP will shed light on how these receptors regulate memory storage. In this review, we highlight several signaling mechanisms believed to enable β-ARs to enhance the expression of long-lasting forms of hippocampal LTP. We focus on hippocampal β-ARs because of the important roles of these receptors in enhancing LTP and memory. α-ARs are not covered here; their roles in hippocampal synaptic plasticity and memory storage are reviewed elsewhere [21].

Section snippets

β-AR signaling: importance for synaptic plasticity in the mammalian hippocampus

NA binds to noradrenergic receptors coupled to G-proteins that initiate intracellular signaling. These can be broadly classified as α1-, α2-, β1-, and β2-ARs [21]. In the hippocampus, all four of these receptor subtypes are expressed in pyramidal neurons and dentate granule cells [22], [23]. β-ARs are also expressed outside of the hippocampus, mainly in the cortex, thalamus, and cerebellum [22], [24]. Interneurons apparently express very few or no β-ARs [22], [23], and glia in area CA1 express

Regulatory control of β-AR signaling

Intracellular signaling events engaged by β-AR activation have several regulatory feedback mechanisms that serve to both prevent activation of downstream effectors in the absence of β-AR agonists and amplify β-AR-dependent responses by compartmentalizing second messenger signaling [36]. Phosphodiesterases (PDEs) are the primary enzymes for cAMP degradation and can constrain β-AR-dependent cellular responses. The primary PDE isoform in the CNS is PDE4 and regulation of β-AR desensitization is

Modulation of excitability by hippocampal β-ARs

Neuromodulators can affect neuronal ability to undergo synaptic plasticity by changing cellular excitability. Activation of β-ARs generally increases the excitability of principal neurons in the dentate gyrus, area CA3, and area CA1 of the rodent hippocampus. In the dentate gyrus, application of either NA or a β-adrenergic agonist such as isoproterenol induces pathway-specific changes in cellular excitability. β-AR-mediated enhancement of the population spike is observed in the medial perforant

β-AR modulation of hippocampal LTP

Highly significant events are easily remembered, often for an entire lifetime. There is evidence to suggest that the physiologic mechanism underlying this retention is related to activation of the brain's noradrenergic system, which promotes plasticity in brain structures that mediate enduring behavioral adaptations [61], [62]. A plausible cellular mechanism for enhancement of hippocampal memory by β-ARs is facilitation of enduring LTP by β-ARs. This phenomenon can be studied in vitro by

PKA-independent β-AR signaling

Traditionally, cAMP-dependent signaling in hippocampal neurons has been thought to be mediated primarily through PKA (for review, see [29]). However, novel cAMP receptors (Epac 1 and 2) also participate in neuronal cAMP-dependent signaling. Epac-dependent, PKA-independent modulation of cellular processes has been demonstrated at the crayfish neuromuscular junction [129], the calyx of Held [130], and in cortical neurons [131]. In the hippocampus, Epac contributes to the forskolin response in

Roles of translational regulation in β-AR modulation of LTP

The inhibitory effects of translation inhibitors on LTP can be detected as early as 20 min after induction [137], [138], [139]. Thus, plasticity-related proteins can be produced rapidly and locally in dendrites after electrical stimulation. Indeed, dendritic expression of some proteins is increased within 5 min after LTP induction [138]. LTP induced by pairing isoproterenol with one 100-Hz train of HFS (“β-LTP”) requires dendritic translation, but not transcription [84]. Other forms of

Prospects for future research: signaling complexes and glutamate receptors

An important principle in intracellular signaling is the key role played by adaptor or scaffolding proteins that couple protein kinases and other signaling molecules near their upstream activators and downstream targets, thereby forming signaling complexes that enable fast, efficient, and highly localized signaling. A prominent family of scaffolding proteins that serves this function for the cAMP/PKA signaling pathway is the A-kinase anchoring proteins (AKAPs), a family of more than 50 proteins

Acknowledgements

T.J.O. was supported by National Institute of Mental Health grant MH609197. S.A.C. was supported by a Postgraduate Scholarship from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. P.V.N. is a Scientist of the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research, and received research support from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.

References (168)

  • T. Abel et al.

    Cell

    (1997)
  • M. Mayford et al.

    Cell

    (1995)
  • C.F. Murchison et al.

    Cell

    (2004)
  • A.P. Nicholas et al.

    Neuroscience

    (1993)
  • K.L. Hillman et al.

    Brain Res. Mol. Brain Res.

    (2005)
  • A. Wanaka et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1989)
  • Y. Zhu et al.

    Dev. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • N.P. Martin et al.

    Cell Signal.

    (2004)
  • P.V. Nguyen et al.

    Prog. Neurobiol.

    (2003)
  • J.M. Schmitt et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2000)
  • X. Luo et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1999)
  • A.M. Zamah et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2002)
  • M.J. Lynch et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2005)
  • M.D. Houslay et al.

    Drug Discov. Today

    (2005)
  • J.M. O'Donnell et al.

    Trends Pharamacol. Sci.

    (2004)
  • D.G. Tilley et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2009)
  • S.K. Shenoy et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2007)
  • J.D. Sweatt

    Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.

    (2004)
  • T.H. Lanthorn et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • A.L. Mueller et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1981)
  • C. Harley

    Prog. Brain Res.

    (1991)
  • S. Bouret et al.

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2005)
  • D. Dahl et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1990)
  • R.S. Neuman et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1983)
  • C. Harley et al.

    Brain Res. Bull.

    (1989)
  • Y.Y. Huang et al.

    Neuron

    (1996)
  • T.D. Moody et al.

    Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • Y.Y. Huang et al.

    Cell

    (1994)
  • T.V. Dunwiddie et al.

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (1982)
  • J.M. Sarvey et al.

    J. Neurosci. Methods

    (1989)
  • J.L. Swanson-Park et al.

    Neuroscience

    (1999)
  • M.J. Thomas et al.

    Neuron

    (1996)
  • D.G. Winder et al.

    Neuron

    (1999)
  • B.L. Bloodgood et al.

    Neuron

    (2007)
  • Y. Ren et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (2006)
  • S.J. Martin et al.

    Annu. Rev. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • M.A. Lynch

    Physiol. Rev.

    (2004)
  • E.R. Kandel

    Science

    (2001)
  • J.R. Whitlock et al.

    Science

    (2006)
  • T.V. Bliss et al.

    J. Physiol.

    (1973)
  • P. Andersen et al.

    Nature

    (1977)
  • W.C. Abraham et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (2002)
  • G.L. Collingridge et al.

    J. Physiol.

    (1983)
  • R.G. Morris et al.

    Nature

    (1986)
  • R.C. Malenka et al.

    Nature

    (1989)
  • R. Malinow et al.

    Science

    (1989)
  • P.W. Frankland et al.

    Nature

    (2001)
  • A. Citri et al.

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (2008)
  • J. Cooper et al.

    The Biochemical Basis of Neuropharmacology

    (2003)
  • S. Frey et al.

    J. Neurosci.

    (2001)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Neuronal hyperexcitability in the Tg2576 mouse model of Alzheimer's disease – the influence of sleep and noradrenergic transmission

      2023, Neurobiology of Aging
      Citation Excerpt :

      First, the antiepileptic effect of NA has been suggested by previous publications describing higher seizure rates in NA-deficient rodents (Szot et al., 1999) or that the decrease in seizure susceptibility observed after vagus nerve stimulation might be mediated by the increased NA concentration that follows the stimulation (Raedt et al., 2011; see Weinshenker & Szot, 2002 for a review). Indeed, α1-ARs are decreased in number both in epileptic rats (Nicoletti et al., 1986) and in the epileptic foci of epilepsy patients (Brière et al., 1986), which has been hypothesised to contribute to the onset of seizures (Brière et al., 1986), yet again hinting at an antiepileptic effect of NA. Finally, several antiseizure medications have been shown to induce increased levels of NA, as was reviewed by Weinshenker and Szot (2002) and by Giorgi et al. (2004).

    • A theory of general intelligence

      2019, Medical Hypotheses
      Citation Excerpt :

      Table 2 summarises the role of each neuromodulator under this hypothesis. The role of NA in episodic and emotional memory function has many pieces of psychological and neurophysiological evidence [79–83]. The role of ACh in unlearning has been suggested based on evidence of induced hippocampal LTD by ACh [96,97], as well as the link between the ACh system and ACC, the error detection region of the brain [94,95].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text