Skip to main content
Log in

Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bibliographic records are extensively used in the study of citations. Based on ISI data, this paper examines citation patterns of the publications of South African scientists in recent years. In particular, the focus of this paper is on citations as to the collaborative dimensions of South African scientists in their publications. The study reveals that the number of citations received by a publication varies not only according to the collaboration but also to the types of collaboration of the authors who are involved in its production. Furthermore, it emerges that the impact of citations on publications differs from discipline to discipline, and affiliating sector to sector, regardless of collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. D., Black, G. C., Clemmons, J. R., Stephen, P. E. (2005), Scientific teams and institutional collaborations: evidence from U.S. universities, 1981–1999. Research Policy, 34: 259–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anuradha, K. T., Urs, S. R. (2007), Bibliometric indicators of Indian research collaboration patterns: a correspondence analysis. Scientometrics, 71: 179–189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Doss, M. J. (2000), Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Current Science, 79: 621–628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Manorama, K. (1989), Are citation-based quantitative techniques adequate for measuring science on the periphery? Scientometrics 15: 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, S., Srinivasan, R., Raman, V. (1994), International collaboration in science: participation by the Asian giants. Scientometrics, 30: 7–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., Gaillard, J. (2000), Science in Africa: a bibliometric panorama using PASCAL database. Scientometrics, 47: 457–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozeman, B., Corley, E. (2004), Scientists’ collaboration strategies: implications for scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy, 33: 599–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieks, D., Chang, H. (1976), Differences in impact of scientific publications: some indices derived from a citation analysis. Social Studies of Science 6: 247–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duque, R. B., Sooryamoorthy, R., Ynalvez, M., Mbatia, P., Dzorgbo, D.-B., Shrum, W. (2005), Collaboration paradox: scientific productivity, the internet, and problems of research in developing areas. Social Studies of Science, 35: 755–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glänzel, W., Lange, C. D. (2002), A distributional approach to multinationality measures of international scientific collaboration. Scientometrics, 54: 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldfinch, S., Dale, T., Derouen, K. Jr. (2003), Science from the periphery: collaboration, networks and ‘periphery effects’ in the citation of New Zealand Crown Research Institutes articles, 1995–2000. Scientometrics, 37: 321–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, B. M., Karisiddippa, C. R. (1999), Collaboration and author productivity: a study with a new variable in Lotka’s Law. Scientometrics, 44: 129–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ingwersen, P., Jacobs, D. (2004), South African research in selected scientific areas: status 1981–2000. Scientometrics, 59: 405–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, D., Ingwersen, P. (2000), A bibliometric study of the publication patterns in the sciences of South African scholars 1981–96. Scientometrics, 47: 75–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Hicks, D. (1997), How much a collaboration worth? A calibrated bibliometric model. Scientometrics, 40: 541–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, J. S., Martin, B. R. (1997), What is research collaboration? Research Policy, 26: 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K.-W. (2006), Measuring international research collaboration of peripheral countries: taking the context into consideration. Scientometrics, 66: 231–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King, D. A. (2004), The scientific impact of nations. Nature, 430: 311–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroc, R. J. (1984), Using citation analysis to assess scholarly productivity. Educational Researcher, 13: 17–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laudel, G. (2002), Collaboration and reward: what do we measure by co-authorships? Research Evaluation, 11: 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., Bozeman, B. (2005), The impact of research collaboration on scientific productivity. Social Studies of Science, 35: 673–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma, N., Guan, J. (2005), An exploratory study on collaboration profiles of Chinese publications in molecular biology. Scientometrics, 65: 343–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, R. M. (1997), The scientific wealth of nations. Science, 275: 793–796.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moed, H. F., Hesselink, F. Th. (1996), The publication output and impact of academic chemistry research in the Netherlands during the 1980s: bibliometric analyses and policy implications. Research Policy 25: 819–836.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez-Berthelemot, N., Russel, J. M., Arvanitis, R., Waast, R., Gaillard, J. (2002), Science in Africa: an overview of mainstream scientific output. Scientometrics, 54: 229–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouris, A. (2003), South Africa’s research publication record: the last ten years. South African Journal of Science, 99: 425–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rabkin, Y. M., Eisemon, T. O., Lafitte-Houssat, J.-J., Rathgeber, E. M. (1979), Citation visibility of Africa’s science. Social Studies of Science, 9: 499–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmoch, U., Schubert, T. (2008), Are international co-publications an indicator for quality of scientific research? Scientometrics, 74(3): 361–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R., Duque, R. B., Ynalvez, M. A., Shrum, W. (2007), Scientific collaboration and the Kerala model: does the Internet make a difference? Journal of International Development, 19: 982–996.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sooryamoorthy, R., Shrum, W. (2007), Does the internet promote collaboration and productivity? Evidence from the scientific community in South Africa. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12: 733–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007), Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: new analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71: 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, C. L., Reddy, B. D., Noakes, T. D., Moran, V. C. (2007), A commentary on the intellectual health of the nation. South African Journal of Science, 103: 22–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velho, L., Krige, J. (1984), Publication and citation practices of Brazilian agricultural scientists. Social Studies of Science, 14: 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Radhamany Sooryamoorthy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sooryamoorthy, R. Do types of collaboration change citation? Collaboration and citation patterns of South African science publications. Scientometrics 81, 177–193 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2126-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-2126-z

Keywords

Navigation