Skip to main content
Log in

The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study views author self-citations, as a blend of experience and cognition of authors. This paper supports to lay down emphasis on consciousness and cognition of authors while assessing author self-citations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, L. M., Oppenheim, C. (1994), Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20: 2–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonzi, S., Snyder, H. W. (1991), Motivations for citations: a comparison of self citation and citation to others, Scientometrics, 2: 245–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Case, D. O., Higgins, G. M. (2000), How we can investigate citation behaviour?: A study of reasons for citing literature in communication, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51: 635–645.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chubin, H. (1976), The conceptualisation of scientific specialities, Sociological Quarterly, 17: 448–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane, C. (1965), Scientists at major and minor universities: A study of productivity and recognition, Americian Sociological Review, 30: 699–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cronin, B. (1984), ThE Citation Process: The Role and Significance of Citations in Scientific Communication, London, Taylor Graham, p. 103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1970), Citation index for studying science, Nature, 227: 669–671.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield, E. (1979), Citation Indexing: Its Theory and Application in Science, New York, Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. F. (1978), Problem retention and problem change in science, Sociological Inquiry, 48: 96–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, G. N. (1977), Referencing as persuasion, Social Studies of Science, 7: 113–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawani, S. M. (1982), On the heterogeneity and classification of author self-citations, Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 33: 281–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (1998), Theories of citation?, Scientometrics, 43: 5–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macroberts, M. H., Macroberts, B. R. (1986), Quantitative measures of communication in science: A study of the formal level, Social Studies of Science, 16: 151–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, E. (1991), Character analysis of a science, Nature, 352: 103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narin, F., Olivastro, D. (1986), National trends in physics and technology, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B36: 101–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, H. P. F., Van Raan, A. F. J. (1991), Structuring scientific activities by co-author analysis. An exercise on a university faculty level, Scientometrics, 20: 235–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trimble, V. (1986), Self-citation rates of astronomical papers, Czechoslovak Journal of Physics, B36: 175–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinkler, P. (1991), Possible causes of differences in information impact of journals, from different subfields, Scientometrics, 20: 145–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, M., Wang, P. (1997), A qualitative study of citing behaviour: Contributions, criteria, and multilevel documentation concerns, Library Quarterly, 67: 122–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wouters, P. (1999), Beyond the Holy Grail: from citation theory to indicator theories, Scientometrics, 44: 561–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pichappan, P., Sarasvady, S. The other side of the coin: The intricacies of author self-citations. Scientometrics 54, 285–290 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016070029935

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1016070029935

Navigation