Skip to main content
Log in

Validation of a capillary gas chromatographic method for the determination of Sildenafil Citrate in its pharmaceutical formulations (Viagra). Experimental design for evaluating the ruggedness of the method

  • Originals
  • Gas Chromatography
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

A simple and rapid method was developed for the analysis of Sildenafil Citrate (Viagra) in its pharmaceutical formulations (Viagra 25, 50 and 100 mg) in the presence of excipients, using its metabolite UK-103, 320 as internal standard for quantification. The optimal separation conditions were established in presence of all compounds in the pharmaceutical formulations and provided analysis times of less than 12 minutes. The conditions were: column head pressure (110 KPa), injector and flame ionisation detector (FID), temperatures (325 and 300°C), time and temperature for the splitless step (0.75 min and 70°C), sample size (2μl) and an oven temperature program. Aspects such as stability of the solutions, linearity, accuracy, reproducibility, specificity, limits of detection (LODs) and of quantification (LOQs) are examined in order to validate the method in presence of all excipients. Some of these aspects such as specificity were also assessed by mass spectrometric detection in the SCAN mode. A ruggedness test of this method was made using the fractional factorial model of Plackett-Burman. In our case, this involved designing a matrix of 15 experiments in which the influence of the seven factors mentioned above was tested at three different levels on different chromatographic results such as resolution, efficiency, relative peak areas, etc. The chromatographic results were evaluated statistically by the method of Youden and Steiner. The highly satisfactory results obtained in both the validation and ruggedness tests show that the CG method could be a very valuable option as an official method for the determination of Sildenafil Citrate in its pharmaceutical formulations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Boolell, M.; Allen, M.J.; Ballard, S.A.; Geti-Attee, S.; Muirhead, G.J.; Naylor, A.M.; Osterloh, I.H; Jingell, C.Int. J. Impot. Res. 1996,8, 47–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morales, A.; Gingell, C.; Collins, M.; Wicker, P.A.; Osterloh, I.H.Int. J. Res. 1998,10, 69–74.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Terret, N.K.; Bell, A.S.; Brown, D.; Ellis, P.Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters 1996,6, 1819–1824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, J.D.H.; Muirhead, D.C.; Taylor, J.E.; Baker, P.R.J. Chromatogr. B 1997,701, 87–95.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, G.S.J Pharm. & Biom. Anal. 1994,12, 643–652.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. U.S. Pharmacopeia 23, United States Pharmacopeial Convention, Inc.1994, 1982–84.

  7. International Conference on Harmonisation, Draft Guideline on Validation of Analytical Procedures; Definitions and Terminology, Federal Register, Volume 60, March 1,1995, 11260

  8. Reviewer Guidance, Validation of Chromatographic Methods, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administrations,1994.

  9. Guideline for Submitting Samples and Analytical Data for Methods Validation, Food and Drug Administrations1987.

  10. Carr, G.P.; Wahlich, J.C.J. Pharm. & Biom. Anal. 1990,8, 613–618.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Edwardson, P.A.; Bhaskar, G.; Fairbrother, J.E.J. Pharm. & Biom. Anal. 1990,8, 929.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Green, J.M.Anal. Chem. 1996,68, 305–309.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Analytical Method Validation: Biovailability. Bioequivalence and Pharmacokinetic Studies. Conference Report.J. Pharm. Sci. 1992,81, 309.

  14. Buick, A.R.; Doig, M.V.; Jeal, S.C.; Land, G.S.; McDowall, R.D.J. Pharm. & Biom. Anal. 1990,8, 629–637.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Phillips, L.J.; Alexander, J.; Hill, H.M.Analysis for Drugs and Metabolites Including Anti-infective Agents, ed. E. Reid and I.D. Wilson, Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge,1990, 2023–36.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Paul, W.L.Pharm. Technol. 1991,15 (March), 131–141.

    Google Scholar 

  17. United States Pharmacopeia 23, Section 1225, Validation of compendial, Methods, United States Pharmacopeial Convention Inc., Rockyille, MD,1995, 1982–1984.

  18. DeSain, C.Biophar. 1992,15, 30–33.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hokanson, G.C.Pharm. Technol. 1994,18 (Sept), 118–130.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dong, M.W.; Passalacqua, P.V.; Choudhury, D.R.J Liq. Chromatogr. 1960,13, 2135–2160.

    Google Scholar 

  21. European Pharmacopeia. Third Edition1997.

  22. HPG1701AA MS Chemstation software, Hewlett-Packard, Palo, Alto, USA1995.

  23. Mulholland, M.; Waterhouse, J.J. Chromatogr. 1987,395, 593–551.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Plackett, R.L.; Burman, J.P.Biometrika,1946,33, 305–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Youden, W.J.: Steiner, E.H.The Association of Official Analytical Chemistry.1975 Ed. Washington. DC, 33–41.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berzas, J.J., Rodríguez, J., Villaseñor, M.J. et al. Validation of a capillary gas chromatographic method for the determination of Sildenafil Citrate in its pharmaceutical formulations (Viagra). Experimental design for evaluating the ruggedness of the method. Chromatographia 55, 601–606 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492908

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02492908

Key Words

Navigation