Skip to main content
Log in

Increasing the between-year stability of the impact factor in the Science Citation Index

  • Short Communications
  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The critical evaluation of scientific productivity during, last years has been done with the help of the Journal Citation Reports ranks of journals. The relative performance of each journal was derived from a simple calculation called Impact Factor. Such measure has been widely criticized by scientometricians, but alternative proposals were nerver adopted due perhaps to their complexity, but also to economic limitations. For the informetric purposes this situation has led to a worrying lack of standardization and, worst of all, makes useless many studies for comparative purposes. In order to enhance the comparative value of the impact factor we develop a new easy method that increases the time period used for its calculation. Such new index has advantages over the old one.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aguillo, I.F. Increasing the between-year stability of the impact factor in the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics 35, 279–282 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018486

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02018486

Keywords

Navigation