.
Увійти 
|
HOME PAGE | |
№ 2020/53
HONCHARENKO Vladyslav 1, PANTELEIMONENKO Andriy 2
1V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University
2Poltava State Agrarian Academy
DISCUSSION ASPECTS OF USING THE TERM «SOCIAL ECONOMY» IN MODERN UKRAINIAN ECONOMIC SCIENCE
Ìstor. nar. gospod. ekon. dumki Ukr. 2020; 53:83-102 | https://doi.org/10.15407/ingedu2020.53.083 |
ABSTRACT ▼
The article is devoted to the problem of not always correct use of the term «social economy» in Ukrainian economic science. It is shown that many Ukrainian researchers in their works on social economy issues are mostly applying to the approaches of Russian economists, and pay little attention to the achievements of modern European researchers in this field. The article contains the attempt to recreate genesis of the term «social economy», starting with economic works of the end of XIX – beginning of the XX centuries by С. Dunoyer («Nouveau trait? sur l'?conomie sociale», 1830), L. Walras («Etudes d’?conomie sociale», 1896), С. Gide («Economie Sociale. Les Institutions de Progr?s Social», 1912), G. Cassel («Theoretische Sozial?konomie», 1918), A. M?llerArmack and modern foreign scientists. The reasons which cause terminological confusion in domestic economic science with the existing term «social economy» have been identified. It is stated that this term has been historically used with two different meanings: for macro- and micro-levels. The first meaning of the term «social economy» was associated with certain theoretical and political concepts of «improving» capitalism, and before World War II existed mainly in theory. In the second meaning, «social economy» actually existed since the mid-nineteenth century in the form of unique subjects of the capitalist economy, which had a non-capitalist nature and a clear social orientation, to which the cooperatives were primarily concerned. It is proved that the two meanings of the term «social economy» have evolved in two additional terms: «social economy» and «sociallyoriented market economy»; and unification of theirs is a rather serious methodological mistake. It is substantiated that today in the EU countries, the term «social economy» is used mainly to refer to set of unique socially-oriented non-profit organizations, such as cooperatives, mutual aid societies, social enterprises, associations, foundations, etc., which form special «third sector» of market economy, fundamentally different from private and public ones.
Keywords: Social economy, social market economy, socially-oriented economy, cooperatives, mutual aid societies, social enterprises, associations, foundations.
JEL: А13, В30, В49, Н89, І39, J54, L31, P59
Article in Russian (pp. 83 - 102) | ||
Article in Ukrainian (pp. 83 - 102) | Download | Downloads :227 |
REFERENCES ▼
2. Baymuratov, U.B. (2010). New social economy: paradigm and prospects. Naukovyy visnyk Poltavsʹkoho universytetu spozhyvchoyi kooperatsiyi Ukrayiny – Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Consumer Cooperatives of Ukraine, 2(41), 54-59 [in Ukrainian].
3. Veselov, YU. V. (1999). Economic sociology in Russia: history and modernity. Zhurnal sotsyolohyy y sotsyalʹnoy antropolohyy – Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 2 (2), 63-70 [in Russian].
4. Heyets, V.M. (2000). Socio-humanitarian components of the prospects of transition to socially oriented economy in Ukraine. Ekonomika Ukrainy – Economy of Ukraine, 1, 4-11 [in Ukrainian].
5. Honcharenko, V.V. (1999). Non-profit nature of activity cooperatives. Regional perspectives, 4(7), 131-138 [in Ukrainian].
6. Honcharenko, V.V., Milʹka, A.I. (2016). Socio-economic efficiency of cooperative enterprises and national cooperative systems (new theoretical and methodological approaches). Naukovyy visnyk Poltavsʹkoho universytetu ekonomiky ta torhivli. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky – Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Economics and Trade, 2, 9-17 [in Ukrainian].
7. Honcharova, S. YU., Honcharov, A.B., Ahramakova, N.V. (2018). Social economy: essence, principles, functions and main guidelines for Ukraine. Biznesinform – Businessinform, 3, 21-26 [in Ukrainian].
8. Hrynberh, P.C., Rubynshteyn, A.YA. (1998). Problems of social economy general theory. Ékonomycheskaya nauka sovremennoy Rossyy – Economic science of modern Russia, 2, 34-56 [in Russian].
9. Derevyanko, YU. M., Melʹnyk, L.H., Kubatko, O.V. (2014). Social and solidary economy: concept and essence, experience and perspectives. Mekhanizm rehulyuvannya ekonomiky – Economy regulation mechanism, 3, 89-98 [in Ukrainian].
10. Yeremenko, V.H. (2003). Social economy: textbook. Vydannya druhe, adaptovane y dopovnene. Kyiv: Informatsiyno-vydavnychyy tsentr Derzhkomstatu [in Ukrainian].
11. Yeremenko, V.H. (1997). Fundamentals of social economy: popular course. Kyiv: MAUP [in Ukrainian].
12. Interview with T.I. Zaslavskaya Retrieved from cyberleninka.ru/article/n/zaslavskaya-tatyana-ivanovna/viewer [in Russian].
13. Kirnos, I.O. (2010). The subject of social economy perception. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Donbasu – Economic Bulletin of Donbass, 2(20), 35-39 [in Ukrainian].
14. Kovalenko, O.M., Maznyk, L.V. (2013). Social economy: Lecture conspectus. Kyiv: NUKHT [in Ukrainian].
15. Kuznetsov, O.A. (2016). Social economy in the works of M.D. Kondratiev. Ekonomichnyy visnyk Natsionalʹnoho hirnychoho universytetu – Economic Bulletin of the National Mining University, 3, 31-38 [in Ukrainian].
16. Panteleimonenko, A.O., Honcharenko, V.V. (2020). On the use of term «social economy» in Ukrainian economic science. Collection of scientific works of scientific-practical conference (pp. 30-31). April 22-23, 2020, Poltava State Agrarian Academy. Poltava: RVV PDAA, [in Ukrainian].
17. Panteleimonenko, A.O. (2009). Non-profit nature of cooperative organizations.Naukovyy visnyk Poltavsʹkoho universytetu spozhyvchoyi kooperatsiyi Ukrayiny. Seriya: Ekonomichni nauky – Scientific Bulletin of Poltava University of Consumer Cooperatives of Ukraine, 1(32), 20-25 [in Ukrainian].
18. Panteleimonenko, A.O. (2008). Third sector: cooperatives as a special form of non-profit organizations. Aktualʹni problemy ekonomiky – Actual problems of economy, 9, 11-17 [in Ukrainian].
19. Pryazhnykova, O.N. (2014). Social and solidary economy: opportunities for sustainable development. Ékonomycheskye y sotsyalʹnye problemy Rossyy: sb. nauch. trudov – Economic and social problems of Russia, 2, 86-107 [in Russian].
20. Romanovsʹkyy, O.O. (2015). Review of trends in social economy in the context of globalization and global economic crises. Efektyvna ekonomika – Efficient economy. № 6. Retrieved from www.economy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z= 4133 [in Ukrainian].
21. Samyhullyn, É.V. (2015). Economy typification variety does not correspond to reality. Ékonomyka y sovremennyy menedzhment: teoryya y praktyka – Economics and modern management: theory and practice, 12(54), 62-69 [in Russian].
22. Simakhova, A.O. (2017). Evolution of approaches to interpretation of social economy in a global sense. Visnyk Dnipropetrovsʹkoho universytetu. Seriya: Svitove hospodarstvo ta mizhnarodni ekonomichni vidnosyny – Bulletin of Dnipropetrovsk University, 9, 80-89 [in Ukrainian].
23. Slezynher, H.É. (2001). Social Economy: Textbook. Moscow: Delo y Servys [in Russian].
24. Smovzhenko, T.S., Stebliy, H.YA. (2015). Paradigmatic renewal of economic theory in domestic science. Sotsialʹno-ekonomichni problemy suchasnoho periodu Ukrayiny – Socio-economic problems of the modern period of Ukraine, 2, 100-104 [in Ukrainian].
25. Social Economy. (2005). Kol. avt. O.O. Byelyayev, M.I. Dyba, V.I. Kyrylenko ta in. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].
26. Yurʹeva, T.V. (1999). Social market economy. Textbook for high schools. Moscow: Russkaya Delovaya Lyteratura [in Russian].
27. 70 years of social market economy. Retrieved from www.deutschland.de/en/topic/business/social-market-economy-ingermany-growth-and-prosperity.
28. Birkhölzer, K. Historische Entwicklung und Wirkungsanalyse sozialer Unternehmen in Deutschland. Retrieved from base.socioeco.org/docs/historische_entwicklung_und_ wirkungsanalyse_sozialer_unternehmen_in_deutschland.pdf [in German].
29. Cassel, G. (1918). Theoretische Sozialökonomie. Leipzig: C. F. Winter. English translation 1923: The Theory of Social Economy, London: T. F. Unwin. Retrieved from mises.org/library/theory-social-economy [in German].
30. Demoustier, D., Rousselière, D. Social Economy as Social Science and Practice: Historical Perspectives on France. Retrieved from base.socioeco.org/ docs/cahr_emoi6.pdf.
31. Gide, Ch. (1912). Economie Sociale. Les Institutions de Progrès Social. Paris: L. Larose et L. Tenin [in French].
32. Liger, Q., Stefan, M., Britton, J. (2016). Social economy. Directorate general for internal policies. Policy department a: economic and scientific policy. Brussels: European Parliament's Committee on Internal Market and Consumer Protection.
33. Moulaert, F. (2005, October) Social Economy, Third Sector and Solidarity Relations: A Conceptual Synthesis from History to Present. Urban Studies, 42(11), 2037-2053. doi.org/10.1080/00420980500279794
34. Recent Evolutions of the Social Economy in the European Union. Study. Directors: Monzón J.L., Chaves R. (2017). Brussel: European Economic and Social Committee.
35. Social economy in the EU. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu/growth/sectors/social-economy_en.
36. The European Summit on Social Economy. Retrieved from www.clustercollaboration.eu /news/european-summit-social-economy.
37. The Social Economy in the European Union Brussel: European Economic and Social Committee Comité économique et social europ. (2012).
38. The social economy: the worldwide making of a third sector. (2009). Retrieved from orbi.uliege.be/bitstream/2268/13613/1/ Chap%201%20Defourny%20Develtere.pdf.
39. Valentinov, V. (2008). Non‐Market Institutions in Economic Development: The Role of the Third Sector. Development and Change, 39 (3), 477-485. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2008.00489.x.
40. Valentinov, V. (2009). Third sector organizations in rural development: a transaction cost perspective. Agricultural and Food Science, 8, 3-15. doi.org/10.2137/145960609788066825.
Events calendar
M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
« May | ||||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |