Epidemiological, Sociodemographic And Clinical Profile of Men With Cancer in Rondônia, Brazilian Amazon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss8.2532Keywords:
cancer in men, epidemiological profile, clinical and sociodemographic profile, Rondônia, Brazilian AmazonAbstract
Objective: to analyze the epidemiological, sociodemographic and clinical profile of men in Rondônia, Western Amazonia (Brazil), diagnosed with the main types of cancer, during a period of 2 (two) years. Materials and Methods: it is an epidemiological, descriptive, cross-sectional and quantitative study, with the systematization of primary data according to the methodological model recommended by Paraguassu-Chaves et al [6]. We used an instrument developed by Paraguassu-Chaves et al [5], semi-structured composed of a series of epidemiological, clinical and sociodemographic variables. The research project is in compliance with Resolution 196/96 of the National Health Council of Brazil, taking into account the ethical aspects of research in Brazil. Main results: the 10 (ten) main types of cancer diagnosed by the location of the primary tumor in men were analyzed, corresponding to 1,163 (74.9%) cases of cancer in men, over a period of 2 (two) years. The 10 (ten) most common types of cancer in men were: prostate (30.9%), non-melanoma skin (22.9%), stomach (11.7%), bronchi and lungs (6.7%), colon (5.8%), leukemia (5.8%), esophagus (4.4%), central nervous system (4.2%), rectum (3.9%) and bladder (3.6%). The age group of 50 to 79 years old reaches 76.4% of the 10 main types of cancer in men. They are more frequent in brown (64.6%) and white (28%) men and with low education. 73.2% of men with cancer are married. 44.9% of men with cancer work in agriculture. 45.6% of men with cancer have a family history of cancer. The sum of smokers and ex-smokers reaches a relative frequency of 43.7%. 19.5% consume alcoholic beverages and 17.2% are ex-consumers. In 40.1%, "other isolated therapeutic procedures" were applied in the first treatment. 14.2% of diagnosed patients died from the disease. Conclusions: The scenario of cancer projection in men in Rondônia is worrying and requires an urgent redirection of actions and strategies for cancer prevention, control, assistance and treatment.
Downloads
References
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2020: incidência de câncer no Brasil / Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2019.
Paraguassu-Chaves CA et al. Cancer in men: a study with patients seen at a hospital in the city of Porto Velho, Brazilian Amazon. Prelo. 2020.
Bray F et al. Global cancer statistics. 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians, Hoboken, v. 68, n. 6, p. 394-424, nov. 2019. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
Paraguassu-Chaves CA et al. Epidemiological and sociodemographic characterization of women and men with cancer in a State in the Brazilian Amazon. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research www.ijier.net Vol:-8 No-06, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31686/ijier.vol8.iss6.2451
Paraguassu-Chaves CA et al. Epidemiologia do câncer em Rondônia. Porto Velho: AICSA, 2017.
Paraguassu-Chaves CA et al. Perfil epidemiológico do câncer em Rondônia: Amazônia brasileira. Porto Velho: AICSA, 2015.
Paraguassu-Chaves CA. Diagnóstico de Câncer em Mulheres em Rondônia: Estudo da Geografia Médica. Editora AICSA, Porto Velho, 2016.
Stewart BW, Wild CP. (ed.). World cancer report 2014. Lyon: IARC Press, 2014. 1010 p.
Ferlay J et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. International journal of cancer, New York, v. 144, n. 8, p. 1941-1953, Apr. 2019 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Estimativa 2018-2019: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2017.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estimativa 2014: Estimativa de Câncer no Brasil. Brasília: MS; 2014.
Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Departamento de Informática do SUS. Sistema de informações sobre mortalidade. Brasília, DF, 2017. Disponível em: <http://www.datasus. gov.br>. Acesso em: 22 set. 2019.
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Atlas on-line de mortalidade. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2014. 1 banco de dados. Acesso restrito.
INCA. 2019. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Tipos de câncer. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2019. Disponível em: https://www.inca.gov.br/tipos-de-cancer. Acesso em: 30 nov. 2019.
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2019. Atlanta: American Cancer Society, 2019.
Maule M, Merletti F. Cancer transition and priorities for cancer control. The Lancet. Oncology, London, v. 13, n. 8, p. 745-746, Aug. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70268-1
Chan JM, Stampfer MJ, Giovannucci E L. What causes prostate cancer? A brief summary of the epidemiology. Seminars in cancer biology, London, v. 8, n. 4, p. 263-273, 1998. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1006/scbi.1998.0075
Nakandi H et al. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Ugandan men regarding prostate cancer. African Journal of Urology, Cairo, v. 19, n. 4, p. 165-170, 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afju.2013.08.001
Howlader N et al. (Ed.). SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2014. Bethesda: National Cancer Institute, 2017. Disponivel em: <https://seer.cancer.gov/csr/1975_2014/>. Acesso em: 1 dez. 2019.
Hernandez BY et al. Relationship of body mass, height, and weight gain to prostate cancer risk in the multiethnic cohort. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, Philadelphia, v. 18. n. 9, p. 2413-2421, 2009. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-09-0293
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Cancer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Monitoramento das ações de controle do câncer de pele. Informativo Detecção Precoce, ano 7, n. 3, 2016c. Disponivel em: <http://www1.inca.gov.br/inca/Arquivos/informativo_deteccao_precoce_03_2016.pdf>. Acesso em: 20 set. 2019.
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Atlas on-line de mortalidade. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2014. 1 banco de dados. Acesso restrito.
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva Estimativa 2010: incidência de câncer no Brasil. Rio de Janeiro: INCA; 2009. 98 p.
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer. Estimativa 2018: incidência de câncer no Brasil / Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Coordenação de Prevenção e Vigilância. Rio de Janeiro: INCA, 2017.
INCA. Instituto Nacional de Câncer José Alencar Gomes da Silva. Tipos de câncer. Rio de Janeiro, 2017b. Disponivel em: < http://www2.inca.gov.br/wps/wcm/connect/tiposdecancer/site/home >. Acesso em: 20 nov. 2019.
Ferlay J et al. Globocan 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Lyon, France: IARC, 2013. (IARC CancerBase, 11). Disponivel em: <http://globocan.iarc.fr>. Acesso em: 14 set. 2019.
Ferlay J et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in Globocan 2012. International Journal of Cancer, Geneve, v. 136, n. 5, p.359-386, 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.29210
Chang WK et al. Association between Helicobacter pylori infection and the risk of gastric cancer in the Korean population: prospective case-controlled study. Journal of gastroenterology, Tokyo, v. 36, n. 12, p. 816-822, 2001. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s005350170003
Diaconu S et al. Helicobacter pylori infection: old and new. Journal of Medicine and Life, Bucharest, v. 10, n. 2, p. 112-117, 2017.
Wang Q et al. Consumption of fruit, but not vegetables, may reduce risk of gastric cancer: results from a meta-analysis of cohort studies. European Journal of Cancer, Oxford, v. 50, n. 8, p. 1498-1509, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2014.02.009
Alicandro G. et al. Educational inequality in cancer mortality: a record linkage study of over 35 million Italians. Cancer Causes Control, Oxford, v. 28, n. 9, p. 997-1006, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-017-0930-y
Reques L. et al Educational differences in mortality and the relative importance of different causes of death: a 7-year follow-up study of Spanish adults. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, London, v. 68, n. 12, p. 1151-1160, 2014. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2014-204186
American Cancer Society. Cancer facts & figures 2015. Atlanta, 2015. Disponivel em: <http://oralcancerfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Us_Cancer_Facts. pdf>. Acesso em: 29 nov. 2019.
Canadian Cancer Society. Canadian cancer statistics 2015. Toronto, 2015.
Ferlay J et al. Globocan 2012 v1.0, cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Lyon, France: IARC, 2013. (IARC CancerBase, 11). Disponivel em: <http://globocan.iarc.fr>. Acesso em: 14 set. 2019.
Boyle P, Leon ME. Epidemiology of colorectal cancer. British Medical Bulletin, London, v. 64, n. 1, p. 1-25, 2002. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bmb/64.1.1
Sandler RS. Epidemiology and risk factors for colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology Clinics of North America, Philadelphia, v. 25, n.4, p.717-735, 1996. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-8553(05)70271-5
Domper Arnal MJ, Ferrández Arenas Á, Lanas Arbeloa, Á. Esophageal cancer: risk factors, screening and endoscopic treatment in western and eastern countries. World journal of gastroenterology: WJG, Pleasanton, v. 21, n. 26, p. 7933-7943, July 2015. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i26.7933
Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia. Diretrizes de tratamento do câncer urológico, 1 ed. Rio de Janeiro: Ed. DOC; 2009.
Kim YB, Hong SJ, Yang SC, Cho JH, Choi YD, Kim GE, Rha KH, Han WK, Cho NH, Oh YT. Pattern of failure in bladder cancer patients treated with radical cystectomy: rationale for adjuvant radiotherapy. J Korean Med Sci. 2010;25(6):835-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2010.25.6.835
Thun MJ et al. (ed.). Cancer epidemiology and prevention. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190238667.001.0001
Paraguassu-Chaves CA et al. Perfil Epidemiológico de Rondônia. 1ª ed. Editora AICSA, Porto Velho, 2015.
Soares PBM et al. Características das mulheres com câncer de mama assistidas em serviços de referência do Norte de Minas Gerais. Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia. vol. 15 nº 3. São Paulo. Sept. 2012. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-790X2012000300013
Mascarello KC et al. Perfil Sociodemográfico e Clínico de Mulheres com Câncer do Colo do Útero Associado ao Estadiamento Inicial. Revista Brasileira de Cancerologia 2012; 58(3): 417-426. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32635/2176-9745.RBC.2012v58n3.594
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Carlos Alberto Paraguassu-Chaves, Allan Kardec Duailibe Barros Filho, Fabrício Moraes de Almeida, Lenita Rodrigues Moreira Dantas, João Viana Fonseca Neto, Alcione Miranda dos Santos, Maria da Conceição Ribeiro Simões
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyrights for articles published in IJIER journals are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work. It is the author's responsibility to bring an infringement action if so desired by the author for more visit Copyright & License.
How to Cite
Accepted 2020-07-18
Published 2020-08-01
