About
Technology
Issues
FAQ
Search
Scientometrics
2-Year Impact
2-Year Article Impact
2-Year Review Impact
2-Year Comm. Impact
2-Year Impact
(No Self-Cite)
3-Year Impact
5-Year Impact
10-Year Impact
Discipline Ranks
h
-index
h
-index
(peer-rev. only)
Score D
Articles
Citations
Article Citations
(peer-rev.)
Citation Distribution
Self-Citations
Overviews
Top Universities
Top Schools
Top Authors
Prolific Authors
Top Articles
Citing Bodies
Top Citing Authors
Top Citing Universities
Top Citing Schools
Top Citing Journals
Top Citing Disciplines
exaly
›
Journals
›
Nature Reviews Cardiology
›
Distribution
Nature Reviews Cardiology
35.6
(top 0.1%)
2-year impact
939
(top 20%)
PR articles
118.5K
(top 5%)
PR citations
190
(top 2%)
PR
h
-index
202
(top 2%)
h
-index
35.4
(top 0.1%)
2-YI (no self-cite.)
3.3K
documents
164.0K
doc citations
This chart shows the citation distribution of
Nature Reviews Cardiology
's peer-reviewed articles on a logarithmic scale for clarity.
Download data:
JSON
CSV
Why is the citation distribution important?
Citation distributions are highly skewed: a small share of peer-reviewed articles often accounts for most citations. The log scale emphasizes the long tail; compare shapes or percentiles rather than single extremes.
site/software ©
exaly
; All materials licenced under
CC by-SA
.
